Cargando…

Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization

BACKGROUND: Neoplastic spinal cord compression is a cause of severe disability in cancer patients. To prevent irreversible paraplegia, a structured strategy is required to address the various impairments present in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the status where rehabilitation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishida, Yukako, Shigematsu, Hideki, Tsukamoto, Shinji, Morimoto, Yasuhiko, Iwata, Eiichiro, Okuda, Akinori, Kawasaki, Sachiko, Tanaka, Masato, Fujii, Hiromasa, Tanaka, Yasuhito, Kido, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32711537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01964-y
_version_ 1783563319400988672
author Ishida, Yukako
Shigematsu, Hideki
Tsukamoto, Shinji
Morimoto, Yasuhiko
Iwata, Eiichiro
Okuda, Akinori
Kawasaki, Sachiko
Tanaka, Masato
Fujii, Hiromasa
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Kido, Akira
author_facet Ishida, Yukako
Shigematsu, Hideki
Tsukamoto, Shinji
Morimoto, Yasuhiko
Iwata, Eiichiro
Okuda, Akinori
Kawasaki, Sachiko
Tanaka, Masato
Fujii, Hiromasa
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Kido, Akira
author_sort Ishida, Yukako
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoplastic spinal cord compression is a cause of severe disability in cancer patients. To prevent irreversible paraplegia, a structured strategy is required to address the various impairments present in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the status where rehabilitation with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) effectively improves ADL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients with neoplastic spinal compression who were treated with MISt. We classified the impairments of patients through our multidisciplinary tumor board based on spine-specific factors, skeletal instability, and tumor growth. The neurological deficits, progress of pathological fracture, incidence of vertebral collapse, and postoperative implant failure were examined. Changes of the Barthel index (BI) scores before and after surgery were investigated throughout the clinical courses. RESULTS: The average duration to ambulation was 7.19 ± 11 days, and we observed no collapse or progression of paralysis except in four cases of complete motor paraplegia before the surgery. Neurological deficiency was improved to or maintained at Frankel’s grade E in 16 patients, remained unchanged in 6 patients (in grades B, C, D), and worsened in 5 patients. BI score comparisons before and after surgery in all patients showed statistically significant increments (p < 0.05). On further analysis, we noted good functional prognosis in patients capable of ambulation within 7 days (p < 0.05) and in patients who could survive longer than 3 months after the surgery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In various cancer patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression, skeletal instability as the primary impairment is a good indication for MISt, as the patients showed early ambulation with improved BI scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7382795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73827952020-07-27 Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization Ishida, Yukako Shigematsu, Hideki Tsukamoto, Shinji Morimoto, Yasuhiko Iwata, Eiichiro Okuda, Akinori Kawasaki, Sachiko Tanaka, Masato Fujii, Hiromasa Tanaka, Yasuhito Kido, Akira World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Neoplastic spinal cord compression is a cause of severe disability in cancer patients. To prevent irreversible paraplegia, a structured strategy is required to address the various impairments present in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to identify the status where rehabilitation with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) effectively improves ADL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients with neoplastic spinal compression who were treated with MISt. We classified the impairments of patients through our multidisciplinary tumor board based on spine-specific factors, skeletal instability, and tumor growth. The neurological deficits, progress of pathological fracture, incidence of vertebral collapse, and postoperative implant failure were examined. Changes of the Barthel index (BI) scores before and after surgery were investigated throughout the clinical courses. RESULTS: The average duration to ambulation was 7.19 ± 11 days, and we observed no collapse or progression of paralysis except in four cases of complete motor paraplegia before the surgery. Neurological deficiency was improved to or maintained at Frankel’s grade E in 16 patients, remained unchanged in 6 patients (in grades B, C, D), and worsened in 5 patients. BI score comparisons before and after surgery in all patients showed statistically significant increments (p < 0.05). On further analysis, we noted good functional prognosis in patients capable of ambulation within 7 days (p < 0.05) and in patients who could survive longer than 3 months after the surgery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In various cancer patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression, skeletal instability as the primary impairment is a good indication for MISt, as the patients showed early ambulation with improved BI scores. BioMed Central 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7382795/ /pubmed/32711537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01964-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ishida, Yukako
Shigematsu, Hideki
Tsukamoto, Shinji
Morimoto, Yasuhiko
Iwata, Eiichiro
Okuda, Akinori
Kawasaki, Sachiko
Tanaka, Masato
Fujii, Hiromasa
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Kido, Akira
Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
title Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
title_full Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
title_fullStr Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
title_full_unstemmed Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
title_short Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
title_sort impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation in patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression using minimally invasive spine stabilization
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32711537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01964-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ishidayukako impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT shigematsuhideki impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT tsukamotoshinji impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT morimotoyasuhiko impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT iwataeiichiro impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT okudaakinori impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT kawasakisachiko impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT tanakamasato impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT fujiihiromasa impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT tanakayasuhito impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization
AT kidoakira impairmentdrivencancerrehabilitationinpatientswithneoplasticspinalcordcompressionusingminimallyinvasivespinestabilization