Cargando…

Simple and reliable method to simultaneously determine urinary 1‐ and 2‐naphthol using in situ derivatization and gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry for biological monitoring of naphthalene exposure in occupational health practice

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple and reliable gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) method to simultaneously determine urinary 1‐naphthol (1‐NAP) and 2‐naphthol (2‐NAP) for biological monitoring of occupational exposure to naphthalene. METHODS: NAPs were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeuchi, Akito, Nakamura, Sadao, Namera, Akira, Kondo, Tomoaki, Onuki, Hiroyuki, Yamamoto, Shinobu, Okamura, Shingo, Nishinoiri, Osamu, Endo, Yoko, Miyauchi, Hiroyuki, Endo, Ginji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12144
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple and reliable gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) method to simultaneously determine urinary 1‐naphthol (1‐NAP) and 2‐naphthol (2‐NAP) for biological monitoring of occupational exposure to naphthalene. METHODS: NAPs were derivatized in situ with acetic anhydride after enzymatic hydrolysis, extracted with n‐hexane, and analyzed using GC‐MS. Validation of the proposed method was conducted in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance. A final validation was performed by analyzing a ClinChek(®)‐Control for phenolic compounds. RESULTS: The linearity of calibration curves was indicated by a high correlation coefficient (>0.999) in the concentration range 1‐100 μg/L for each NAP. The limits of detection and quantification for each NAP were 0.30 and 1.00 μg/L, respectively. The recovery was 90.8%‐98.1%. The intraday and interday accuracies, expressed as the deviation from the nominal value, were 92.2%‐99.9% and 93.4%‐99.9%, respectively. The intraday and interday precision, expressed as the relative standard deviation, was 0.3%‐3.9% and 0.4%‐4.1%, respectively. The ClinChek(®) values obtained using our method were sufficiently accurate. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method is simple, reliable, and appropriate for routine analyses, and is useful for biological monitoring of naphthalene exposure in occupational health practice.