Cargando…

Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients

BACKGROUND: Recently, reports have classified lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) as an effective indicator for predicting the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of LMR for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Through meta-analysis, this work intends to evaluate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shuwen, Fang, Yinghua, Mo, Zhikang, Lin, Ye, Ji, Chenggang, Jian, Zhixiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32711514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01962-0
_version_ 1783563329260748800
author Lin, Shuwen
Fang, Yinghua
Mo, Zhikang
Lin, Ye
Ji, Chenggang
Jian, Zhixiang
author_facet Lin, Shuwen
Fang, Yinghua
Mo, Zhikang
Lin, Ye
Ji, Chenggang
Jian, Zhixiang
author_sort Lin, Shuwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, reports have classified lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) as an effective indicator for predicting the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of LMR for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Through meta-analysis, this work intends to evaluate the potential prognostic role of pretreatment LMR in patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We reviewed and extracted eligible articles from Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. A meta-analysis was conducted using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the comparison between pretreatment LMR and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival/time to progression (DFS/RFS/TTP). RESULTS: In total, 11 studies (16 cohorts) including 3338 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC) were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Notably, we revealed that high pretreatment LMR predicted better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.80, P < 0.001, I-squared = 69.3%, Ph < 0.001) and DFS/RFS/TTP (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31–0.96, P = 0.037, I-squared = 89.9%, Ph < 0.001) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Further, through subgroup analyses, we showed that high pretreatment LMR was significantly associated with the favorable OS regardless of ethnicity, study design, treatment method, variable type, the cut-off value for LMR, and disease stages of I–IV and III–IV. CONCLUSION: The findings from our study suggest that high pretreatment LMR is associated with better OS and DFS/RFS/TTP in patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. As such, it can potentially serve as a novel prognostic biomarker for patients with pancreatic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7382838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73828382020-07-28 Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients Lin, Shuwen Fang, Yinghua Mo, Zhikang Lin, Ye Ji, Chenggang Jian, Zhixiang World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Recently, reports have classified lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) as an effective indicator for predicting the prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of LMR for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Through meta-analysis, this work intends to evaluate the potential prognostic role of pretreatment LMR in patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We reviewed and extracted eligible articles from Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. A meta-analysis was conducted using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the comparison between pretreatment LMR and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival/time to progression (DFS/RFS/TTP). RESULTS: In total, 11 studies (16 cohorts) including 3338 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC) were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Notably, we revealed that high pretreatment LMR predicted better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.80, P < 0.001, I-squared = 69.3%, Ph < 0.001) and DFS/RFS/TTP (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31–0.96, P = 0.037, I-squared = 89.9%, Ph < 0.001) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Further, through subgroup analyses, we showed that high pretreatment LMR was significantly associated with the favorable OS regardless of ethnicity, study design, treatment method, variable type, the cut-off value for LMR, and disease stages of I–IV and III–IV. CONCLUSION: The findings from our study suggest that high pretreatment LMR is associated with better OS and DFS/RFS/TTP in patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. As such, it can potentially serve as a novel prognostic biomarker for patients with pancreatic cancer. BioMed Central 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7382838/ /pubmed/32711514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01962-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lin, Shuwen
Fang, Yinghua
Mo, Zhikang
Lin, Ye
Ji, Chenggang
Jian, Zhixiang
Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
title Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
title_full Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
title_fullStr Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
title_short Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
title_sort prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis including 3338 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32711514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01962-0
work_keys_str_mv AT linshuwen prognosticvalueoflymphocytetomonocyteratioinpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisincluding3338patients
AT fangyinghua prognosticvalueoflymphocytetomonocyteratioinpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisincluding3338patients
AT mozhikang prognosticvalueoflymphocytetomonocyteratioinpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisincluding3338patients
AT linye prognosticvalueoflymphocytetomonocyteratioinpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisincluding3338patients
AT jichenggang prognosticvalueoflymphocytetomonocyteratioinpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisincluding3338patients
AT jianzhixiang prognosticvalueoflymphocytetomonocyteratioinpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisincluding3338patients