Cargando…
Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: While conducting systemic reviews, searching for ongoing or unpublished trials is critical to address publication bias. As of April 2019, records of ongoing or unpublished randomized and/or quasi-randomized controlled trials registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platfo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32711471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01083-y |
_version_ | 1783563330937421824 |
---|---|
author | Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Kataoka, Yuki |
author_facet | Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Kataoka, Yuki |
author_sort | Banno, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While conducting systemic reviews, searching for ongoing or unpublished trials is critical to address publication bias. As of April 2019, records of ongoing or unpublished randomized and/or quasi-randomized controlled trials registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov are available in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). These records registered in CENTRAL include studies published since the inception of ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. Whether systematic reviewers can search CENTRAL to identify ongoing or unpublished trials instead of ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov is unknown. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. A consecutive sample of ongoing or unpublished studies published from June 1, 2019 to December 27, 2019 was selected from the Cochrane Reviews. The sensitivity and the number needed to read (NNR) were assessed from among the studies selected from CENTRAL instead of ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov and also assessed the characteristics of studies not identified by searching CENTRAL. RESULTS: In total, 247 records from 50 Cochrane reviews were included; of these, 200 were identified by searching CENTRAL, whereas the remaining 47 records were not. The sensitivity of searching CENTRAL was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.85). The NNR was 115 (95% CI: 101, 133). The 47 unidentified studies were registered through ClinicalTrials.gov or ICTRP. Sixteen unidentified studies were not indexed in CENTRAL. CONCLUSIONS: For systematic reviewers, searching CENTRAL could not substitute for searching ClinicalTrials.gov and/or ICTRP. Systematic reviewers should not only search CENTRAL but also ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A pre-specified protocol was applied to conduct this study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR). Trial registration number: UMIN000038981. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7382846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73828462020-07-28 Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Kataoka, Yuki BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: While conducting systemic reviews, searching for ongoing or unpublished trials is critical to address publication bias. As of April 2019, records of ongoing or unpublished randomized and/or quasi-randomized controlled trials registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov are available in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). These records registered in CENTRAL include studies published since the inception of ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. Whether systematic reviewers can search CENTRAL to identify ongoing or unpublished trials instead of ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov is unknown. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. A consecutive sample of ongoing or unpublished studies published from June 1, 2019 to December 27, 2019 was selected from the Cochrane Reviews. The sensitivity and the number needed to read (NNR) were assessed from among the studies selected from CENTRAL instead of ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov and also assessed the characteristics of studies not identified by searching CENTRAL. RESULTS: In total, 247 records from 50 Cochrane reviews were included; of these, 200 were identified by searching CENTRAL, whereas the remaining 47 records were not. The sensitivity of searching CENTRAL was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.85). The NNR was 115 (95% CI: 101, 133). The 47 unidentified studies were registered through ClinicalTrials.gov or ICTRP. Sixteen unidentified studies were not indexed in CENTRAL. CONCLUSIONS: For systematic reviewers, searching CENTRAL could not substitute for searching ClinicalTrials.gov and/or ICTRP. Systematic reviewers should not only search CENTRAL but also ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A pre-specified protocol was applied to conduct this study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR). Trial registration number: UMIN000038981. BioMed Central 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7382846/ /pubmed/32711471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01083-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Banno, Masahiro Tsujimoto, Yasushi Kataoka, Yuki Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
title | Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | using the cochrane central register of controlled trials to identify clinical trial registration is insufficient: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32711471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01083-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bannomasahiro usingthecochranecentralregisterofcontrolledtrialstoidentifyclinicaltrialregistrationisinsufficientacrosssectionalstudy AT tsujimotoyasushi usingthecochranecentralregisterofcontrolledtrialstoidentifyclinicaltrialregistrationisinsufficientacrosssectionalstudy AT kataokayuki usingthecochranecentralregisterofcontrolledtrialstoidentifyclinicaltrialregistrationisinsufficientacrosssectionalstudy |