Cargando…
Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future
In response to COVID-19, seed security interventions are being planned to help bolster fragile livelihoods. After 25 years of research during emergencies, there are many lessons to build on, including that seed systems, especially informal markets, prove fairly resilient and often function even in h...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01068-1 |
_version_ | 1783563350739779584 |
---|---|
author | Sperling, Louise |
author_facet | Sperling, Louise |
author_sort | Sperling, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | In response to COVID-19, seed security interventions are being planned to help bolster fragile livelihoods. After 25 years of research during emergencies, there are many lessons to build on, including that seed systems, especially informal markets, prove fairly resilient and often function even in high stress contexts. As a wise first step, given the possible volatility in supply, farmers’ seed saving should be supported actively and at scale. Rigorous remote assessments will have to become the new norm for gauging seed security, with reviews recognizing that different crops might be affected in different ways by specific seed channel stress or breakdown. Well-known short-term seed security responses, for example, Direct Seed Distribution, will need to be tailored to the new COVID-19 reality, particularly in terms of altering logistics. More fundamentally, three new factors might herald a transformation in response: 1) Choice for farmers has to be the operative principle (especially as markets may fluctuate quickly); 2) Remote two-way ‘state of the art’ communication has to be built rapidly; and 3) Seed quality options might need to be liberalized, especially given the scale of possible seed security intervention. Covid-19 effects will likely linger several years or potentially six to nine seasons (depending on agricultural calendar). Now might be the time to move from stop-gap responses (and repetitive ones) to more sustainable and powerful market-led support, with particular emphasis on responses that leverage and strengthen the informal sector markets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7382957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73829572020-07-28 Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future Sperling, Louise Food Secur Opinion Piece In response to COVID-19, seed security interventions are being planned to help bolster fragile livelihoods. After 25 years of research during emergencies, there are many lessons to build on, including that seed systems, especially informal markets, prove fairly resilient and often function even in high stress contexts. As a wise first step, given the possible volatility in supply, farmers’ seed saving should be supported actively and at scale. Rigorous remote assessments will have to become the new norm for gauging seed security, with reviews recognizing that different crops might be affected in different ways by specific seed channel stress or breakdown. Well-known short-term seed security responses, for example, Direct Seed Distribution, will need to be tailored to the new COVID-19 reality, particularly in terms of altering logistics. More fundamentally, three new factors might herald a transformation in response: 1) Choice for farmers has to be the operative principle (especially as markets may fluctuate quickly); 2) Remote two-way ‘state of the art’ communication has to be built rapidly; and 3) Seed quality options might need to be liberalized, especially given the scale of possible seed security intervention. Covid-19 effects will likely linger several years or potentially six to nine seasons (depending on agricultural calendar). Now might be the time to move from stop-gap responses (and repetitive ones) to more sustainable and powerful market-led support, with particular emphasis on responses that leverage and strengthen the informal sector markets. Springer Netherlands 2020-07-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7382957/ /pubmed/32837659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01068-1 Text en © International Society for Plant Pathology and Springer Nature B.V. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Piece Sperling, Louise Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
title | Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
title_full | Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
title_fullStr | Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
title_full_unstemmed | Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
title_short | Seed security response during COVID-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
title_sort | seed security response during covid-19: building on evidence and orienting to the future |
topic | Opinion Piece |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01068-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sperlinglouise seedsecurityresponseduringcovid19buildingonevidenceandorientingtothefuture |