Cargando…
Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
BACKGROUND: Effective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100002 |
_version_ | 1783563356030894080 |
---|---|
author | Phillips, Georgina Creaton, Anne Airdhill-Enosa, Pai Toito'ona, Patrick Kafoa, Berlin O'Reilly, Gerard Cameron, Peter |
author_facet | Phillips, Georgina Creaton, Anne Airdhill-Enosa, Pai Toito'ona, Patrick Kafoa, Berlin O'Reilly, Gerard Cameron, Peter |
author_sort | Phillips, Georgina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Effective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We aimed to describe the current status, determine priority actions and set minimum standards for EC systems development across the Pacific region. METHODS: We used a prospective, multiphase, expert consensus process to collect data from PICT EC stakeholders using focus groups, electronic surveys and panel review between August 2018 and April 2019. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, consensus agreement and graphic interpretation. We structured the research according to the World Health Organisation EC Systems and building block framework adapted for the Pacific context. FINDINGS: Over 200 participants from 17 PICTs engaged in at least one component of the multiphase process. Gaps in functional capacity exist in most PICTs for both facility-based and pre-hospital care. EC is a low priority across the Pacific and integrated poorly with disaster plans. Participants emphasised human resource support and government recognition of EC as priority actions, and generated 24 facility-based and 22 pre-hospital Pacific EC standards across all building blocks. INTERPRETATION: PICT stakeholders now have baseline indicators and a comprehensive roadmap for EC development within a globally recognised health systems framework. This study generates practical, context-appropriate tools to trigger further research, conduct evidence-based advocacy, drive future improvements and measure progress towards achieving universal health access for Pacific peoples. FUNDING: Secretariat of the Pacific Community (partial) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7382998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73829982020-07-28 Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories Phillips, Georgina Creaton, Anne Airdhill-Enosa, Pai Toito'ona, Patrick Kafoa, Berlin O'Reilly, Gerard Cameron, Peter Lancet Reg Health West Pac Research Paper BACKGROUND: Effective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We aimed to describe the current status, determine priority actions and set minimum standards for EC systems development across the Pacific region. METHODS: We used a prospective, multiphase, expert consensus process to collect data from PICT EC stakeholders using focus groups, electronic surveys and panel review between August 2018 and April 2019. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, consensus agreement and graphic interpretation. We structured the research according to the World Health Organisation EC Systems and building block framework adapted for the Pacific context. FINDINGS: Over 200 participants from 17 PICTs engaged in at least one component of the multiphase process. Gaps in functional capacity exist in most PICTs for both facility-based and pre-hospital care. EC is a low priority across the Pacific and integrated poorly with disaster plans. Participants emphasised human resource support and government recognition of EC as priority actions, and generated 24 facility-based and 22 pre-hospital Pacific EC standards across all building blocks. INTERPRETATION: PICT stakeholders now have baseline indicators and a comprehensive roadmap for EC development within a globally recognised health systems framework. This study generates practical, context-appropriate tools to trigger further research, conduct evidence-based advocacy, drive future improvements and measure progress towards achieving universal health access for Pacific peoples. FUNDING: Secretariat of the Pacific Community (partial) Elsevier 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7382998/ /pubmed/34173588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100002 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Phillips, Georgina Creaton, Anne Airdhill-Enosa, Pai Toito'ona, Patrick Kafoa, Berlin O'Reilly, Gerard Cameron, Peter Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories |
title | Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories |
title_full | Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories |
title_fullStr | Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories |
title_short | Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories |
title_sort | emergency care status, priorities and standards for the pacific region: a multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different pacific island countries and territories |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsgeorgina emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories AT creatonanne emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories AT airdhillenosapai emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories AT toitoonapatrick emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories AT kafoaberlin emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories AT oreillygerard emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories AT cameronpeter emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories |