Cargando…

Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories

BACKGROUND: Effective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Georgina, Creaton, Anne, Airdhill-Enosa, Pai, Toito'ona, Patrick, Kafoa, Berlin, O'Reilly, Gerard, Cameron, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100002
_version_ 1783563356030894080
author Phillips, Georgina
Creaton, Anne
Airdhill-Enosa, Pai
Toito'ona, Patrick
Kafoa, Berlin
O'Reilly, Gerard
Cameron, Peter
author_facet Phillips, Georgina
Creaton, Anne
Airdhill-Enosa, Pai
Toito'ona, Patrick
Kafoa, Berlin
O'Reilly, Gerard
Cameron, Peter
author_sort Phillips, Georgina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We aimed to describe the current status, determine priority actions and set minimum standards for EC systems development across the Pacific region. METHODS: We used a prospective, multiphase, expert consensus process to collect data from PICT EC stakeholders using focus groups, electronic surveys and panel review between August 2018 and April 2019. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, consensus agreement and graphic interpretation. We structured the research according to the World Health Organisation EC Systems and building block framework adapted for the Pacific context. FINDINGS: Over 200 participants from 17 PICTs engaged in at least one component of the multiphase process. Gaps in functional capacity exist in most PICTs for both facility-based and pre-hospital care. EC is a low priority across the Pacific and integrated poorly with disaster plans. Participants emphasised human resource support and government recognition of EC as priority actions, and generated 24 facility-based and 22 pre-hospital Pacific EC standards across all building blocks. INTERPRETATION: PICT stakeholders now have baseline indicators and a comprehensive roadmap for EC development within a globally recognised health systems framework. This study generates practical, context-appropriate tools to trigger further research, conduct evidence-based advocacy, drive future improvements and measure progress towards achieving universal health access for Pacific peoples. FUNDING: Secretariat of the Pacific Community (partial)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7382998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73829982020-07-28 Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories Phillips, Georgina Creaton, Anne Airdhill-Enosa, Pai Toito'ona, Patrick Kafoa, Berlin O'Reilly, Gerard Cameron, Peter Lancet Reg Health West Pac Research Paper BACKGROUND: Effective emergency care (EC) reduces mortality, aids disaster and outbreak response, and is necessary for universal health coverage. Surge events frequently challenge Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs), where robust routine EC is required for resilient health systems. We aimed to describe the current status, determine priority actions and set minimum standards for EC systems development across the Pacific region. METHODS: We used a prospective, multiphase, expert consensus process to collect data from PICT EC stakeholders using focus groups, electronic surveys and panel review between August 2018 and April 2019. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, consensus agreement and graphic interpretation. We structured the research according to the World Health Organisation EC Systems and building block framework adapted for the Pacific context. FINDINGS: Over 200 participants from 17 PICTs engaged in at least one component of the multiphase process. Gaps in functional capacity exist in most PICTs for both facility-based and pre-hospital care. EC is a low priority across the Pacific and integrated poorly with disaster plans. Participants emphasised human resource support and government recognition of EC as priority actions, and generated 24 facility-based and 22 pre-hospital Pacific EC standards across all building blocks. INTERPRETATION: PICT stakeholders now have baseline indicators and a comprehensive roadmap for EC development within a globally recognised health systems framework. This study generates practical, context-appropriate tools to trigger further research, conduct evidence-based advocacy, drive future improvements and measure progress towards achieving universal health access for Pacific peoples. FUNDING: Secretariat of the Pacific Community (partial) Elsevier 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7382998/ /pubmed/34173588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100002 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Phillips, Georgina
Creaton, Anne
Airdhill-Enosa, Pai
Toito'ona, Patrick
Kafoa, Berlin
O'Reilly, Gerard
Cameron, Peter
Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
title Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
title_full Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
title_fullStr Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
title_full_unstemmed Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
title_short Emergency care status, priorities and standards for the Pacific region: A multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different Pacific Island Countries and Territories
title_sort emergency care status, priorities and standards for the pacific region: a multiphase survey and consensus process across 17 different pacific island countries and territories
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100002
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsgeorgina emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories
AT creatonanne emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories
AT airdhillenosapai emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories
AT toitoonapatrick emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories
AT kafoaberlin emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories
AT oreillygerard emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories
AT cameronpeter emergencycarestatusprioritiesandstandardsforthepacificregionamultiphasesurveyandconsensusprocessacross17differentpacificislandcountriesandterritories