Cargando…

Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation

BACKGROUND: Agonists of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor are potential agents for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C). However, only tegaserod has been approved for a very limited population in the US. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minesapride in patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamatani, Tatsuto, Fukudo, Shin, Nakada, Yosuke, Inada, Hiroshi, Kazumori, Kiyoyasu, Miwa, Hiroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15907
_version_ 1783563457131446272
author Hamatani, Tatsuto
Fukudo, Shin
Nakada, Yosuke
Inada, Hiroshi
Kazumori, Kiyoyasu
Miwa, Hiroto
author_facet Hamatani, Tatsuto
Fukudo, Shin
Nakada, Yosuke
Inada, Hiroshi
Kazumori, Kiyoyasu
Miwa, Hiroto
author_sort Hamatani, Tatsuto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Agonists of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor are potential agents for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C). However, only tegaserod has been approved for a very limited population in the US. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minesapride in patients with Rome IV defined IBS‐C. METHODS: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐finding study was performed. Overall, 411 patients were randomised to receive minesapride at 10, 20 or 40 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) composite endpoint (responder: a patient who reported an increase in one or more complete spontaneous bowel movements from baseline and improvement of ≥30% from baseline in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score, both in the same week for ≥6/12 weeks). RESULTS: The FDA composite responder rate was 13.6% (14/103) in the placebo group, 13.6% (14/103) in the 10 mg group, 19.2% (20/104) in the 20 mg group and 14.9% (15/101) in the 40 mg group, and no dose‐response relationship was found. A greater percentage of minesapride 40 mg‐treated patients than placebo‐treated patients met both responder requirements for ≥9/12 weeks as the stricter composite evaluation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, minesapride 40 mg significantly increased SBM frequency compared with placebo (adjusted P < 0.001 at Week 12). The most common adverse event was mild diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Minesapride was safe and well‐tolerated. Although the primary endpoint was negative, minesapride 40 mg is likely to improve the stricter composite endpoint and SBM frequency. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Number: Japic CTI‐163459.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7383621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73836212020-07-27 Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation Hamatani, Tatsuto Fukudo, Shin Nakada, Yosuke Inada, Hiroshi Kazumori, Kiyoyasu Miwa, Hiroto Aliment Pharmacol Ther Randomised Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Agonists of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor are potential agents for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C). However, only tegaserod has been approved for a very limited population in the US. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minesapride in patients with Rome IV defined IBS‐C. METHODS: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐finding study was performed. Overall, 411 patients were randomised to receive minesapride at 10, 20 or 40 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) composite endpoint (responder: a patient who reported an increase in one or more complete spontaneous bowel movements from baseline and improvement of ≥30% from baseline in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score, both in the same week for ≥6/12 weeks). RESULTS: The FDA composite responder rate was 13.6% (14/103) in the placebo group, 13.6% (14/103) in the 10 mg group, 19.2% (20/104) in the 20 mg group and 14.9% (15/101) in the 40 mg group, and no dose‐response relationship was found. A greater percentage of minesapride 40 mg‐treated patients than placebo‐treated patients met both responder requirements for ≥9/12 weeks as the stricter composite evaluation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, minesapride 40 mg significantly increased SBM frequency compared with placebo (adjusted P < 0.001 at Week 12). The most common adverse event was mild diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Minesapride was safe and well‐tolerated. Although the primary endpoint was negative, minesapride 40 mg is likely to improve the stricter composite endpoint and SBM frequency. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Number: Japic CTI‐163459. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-25 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7383621/ /pubmed/32583907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15907 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Randomised Clinical Trial
Hamatani, Tatsuto
Fukudo, Shin
Nakada, Yosuke
Inada, Hiroshi
Kazumori, Kiyoyasu
Miwa, Hiroto
Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
title Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
title_full Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
title_fullStr Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
title_full_unstemmed Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
title_short Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
title_sort randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
topic Randomised Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15907
work_keys_str_mv AT hamatanitatsuto randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation
AT fukudoshin randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation
AT nakadayosuke randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation
AT inadahiroshi randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation
AT kazumorikiyoyasu randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation
AT miwahiroto randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation