Cargando…
Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation
BACKGROUND: Agonists of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor are potential agents for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C). However, only tegaserod has been approved for a very limited population in the US. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minesapride in patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15907 |
_version_ | 1783563457131446272 |
---|---|
author | Hamatani, Tatsuto Fukudo, Shin Nakada, Yosuke Inada, Hiroshi Kazumori, Kiyoyasu Miwa, Hiroto |
author_facet | Hamatani, Tatsuto Fukudo, Shin Nakada, Yosuke Inada, Hiroshi Kazumori, Kiyoyasu Miwa, Hiroto |
author_sort | Hamatani, Tatsuto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Agonists of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor are potential agents for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C). However, only tegaserod has been approved for a very limited population in the US. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minesapride in patients with Rome IV defined IBS‐C. METHODS: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐finding study was performed. Overall, 411 patients were randomised to receive minesapride at 10, 20 or 40 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) composite endpoint (responder: a patient who reported an increase in one or more complete spontaneous bowel movements from baseline and improvement of ≥30% from baseline in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score, both in the same week for ≥6/12 weeks). RESULTS: The FDA composite responder rate was 13.6% (14/103) in the placebo group, 13.6% (14/103) in the 10 mg group, 19.2% (20/104) in the 20 mg group and 14.9% (15/101) in the 40 mg group, and no dose‐response relationship was found. A greater percentage of minesapride 40 mg‐treated patients than placebo‐treated patients met both responder requirements for ≥9/12 weeks as the stricter composite evaluation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, minesapride 40 mg significantly increased SBM frequency compared with placebo (adjusted P < 0.001 at Week 12). The most common adverse event was mild diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Minesapride was safe and well‐tolerated. Although the primary endpoint was negative, minesapride 40 mg is likely to improve the stricter composite endpoint and SBM frequency. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Number: Japic CTI‐163459. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7383621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73836212020-07-27 Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation Hamatani, Tatsuto Fukudo, Shin Nakada, Yosuke Inada, Hiroshi Kazumori, Kiyoyasu Miwa, Hiroto Aliment Pharmacol Ther Randomised Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Agonists of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor are potential agents for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS‐C). However, only tegaserod has been approved for a very limited population in the US. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minesapride in patients with Rome IV defined IBS‐C. METHODS: A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐finding study was performed. Overall, 411 patients were randomised to receive minesapride at 10, 20 or 40 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) composite endpoint (responder: a patient who reported an increase in one or more complete spontaneous bowel movements from baseline and improvement of ≥30% from baseline in weekly average of worst abdominal pain score, both in the same week for ≥6/12 weeks). RESULTS: The FDA composite responder rate was 13.6% (14/103) in the placebo group, 13.6% (14/103) in the 10 mg group, 19.2% (20/104) in the 20 mg group and 14.9% (15/101) in the 40 mg group, and no dose‐response relationship was found. A greater percentage of minesapride 40 mg‐treated patients than placebo‐treated patients met both responder requirements for ≥9/12 weeks as the stricter composite evaluation (P < 0.05). Furthermore, minesapride 40 mg significantly increased SBM frequency compared with placebo (adjusted P < 0.001 at Week 12). The most common adverse event was mild diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Minesapride was safe and well‐tolerated. Although the primary endpoint was negative, minesapride 40 mg is likely to improve the stricter composite endpoint and SBM frequency. Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Number: Japic CTI‐163459. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-25 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7383621/ /pubmed/32583907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15907 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Randomised Clinical Trial Hamatani, Tatsuto Fukudo, Shin Nakada, Yosuke Inada, Hiroshi Kazumori, Kiyoyasu Miwa, Hiroto Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
title | Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
title_full | Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
title_fullStr | Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
title_short | Randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
title_sort | randomised clinical trial: minesapride vs placebo for irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation |
topic | Randomised Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32583907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15907 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamatanitatsuto randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation AT fukudoshin randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation AT nakadayosuke randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation AT inadahiroshi randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation AT kazumorikiyoyasu randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation AT miwahiroto randomisedclinicaltrialminesapridevsplaceboforirritablebowelsyndromewithpredominantconstipation |