Cargando…

SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study

The SPOT GRADE (SG), a Surface Bleeding Severity Scale, is a unique visual method for assessing bleeding severity based on quantitative determinations of blood flow. This study assessed the reliability of the SG scale in a clinical setting and collected initial data on the safety and efficacy of HEM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaizo, Daniel J. Del, Spotnitz, William D., Hoffman, Rachel W., Hermann, Mark Christopher, Sher, Linda S., Spotnitz, Russell H., Genyk, Yuri S., Schorn, Ian J., Gillen, Daniel L., White, Bobby L., Miller, Bruce G., Manson, Roberto J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620936340
_version_ 1783563465054486528
author Gaizo, Daniel J. Del
Spotnitz, William D.
Hoffman, Rachel W.
Hermann, Mark Christopher
Sher, Linda S.
Spotnitz, Russell H.
Genyk, Yuri S.
Schorn, Ian J.
Gillen, Daniel L.
White, Bobby L.
Miller, Bruce G.
Manson, Roberto J.
author_facet Gaizo, Daniel J. Del
Spotnitz, William D.
Hoffman, Rachel W.
Hermann, Mark Christopher
Sher, Linda S.
Spotnitz, Russell H.
Genyk, Yuri S.
Schorn, Ian J.
Gillen, Daniel L.
White, Bobby L.
Miller, Bruce G.
Manson, Roberto J.
author_sort Gaizo, Daniel J. Del
collection PubMed
description The SPOT GRADE (SG), a Surface Bleeding Severity Scale, is a unique visual method for assessing bleeding severity based on quantitative determinations of blood flow. This study assessed the reliability of the SG scale in a clinical setting and collected initial data on the safety and efficacy of HEMOBLAST Bellows (HB), a hemostatic agent, in abdominal and orthopedic operations. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled across 3 centers and received the investigational device. Bleeding severity and hemostasis were independently assessed by 2 surgical investigators at baseline and at 3, 6, and 10 minutes after application of HB and compared for agreement. The mean paired κ statistic for assignment of SG scores was .7754. The mean paired κ statistics for determining eligibility for participation in the trial based on bleeding severity and the mean paired κ statistics determining the presence of hemostasis were .9301 and .9301, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving hemostasis within 3, 6, and 10 minutes of HB application were 50.0%, 79.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects and one possible serious adverse device effect, as determined by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC). The reliability of the SG scale was validated in a clinical setting. Initial data on the safety and efficacy of HB in abdominal and orthopedic operations were collected, and there were no concerns raised by the investigators or the IDMC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7383655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73836552020-08-10 SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study Gaizo, Daniel J. Del Spotnitz, William D. Hoffman, Rachel W. Hermann, Mark Christopher Sher, Linda S. Spotnitz, Russell H. Genyk, Yuri S. Schorn, Ian J. Gillen, Daniel L. White, Bobby L. Miller, Bruce G. Manson, Roberto J. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Article The SPOT GRADE (SG), a Surface Bleeding Severity Scale, is a unique visual method for assessing bleeding severity based on quantitative determinations of blood flow. This study assessed the reliability of the SG scale in a clinical setting and collected initial data on the safety and efficacy of HEMOBLAST Bellows (HB), a hemostatic agent, in abdominal and orthopedic operations. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled across 3 centers and received the investigational device. Bleeding severity and hemostasis were independently assessed by 2 surgical investigators at baseline and at 3, 6, and 10 minutes after application of HB and compared for agreement. The mean paired κ statistic for assignment of SG scores was .7754. The mean paired κ statistics for determining eligibility for participation in the trial based on bleeding severity and the mean paired κ statistics determining the presence of hemostasis were .9301 and .9301, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving hemostasis within 3, 6, and 10 minutes of HB application were 50.0%, 79.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. There were no unanticipated adverse device effects and one possible serious adverse device effect, as determined by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC). The reliability of the SG scale was validated in a clinical setting. Initial data on the safety and efficacy of HB in abdominal and orthopedic operations were collected, and there were no concerns raised by the investigators or the IDMC. SAGE Publications 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7383655/ /pubmed/32703005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620936340 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaizo, Daniel J. Del
Spotnitz, William D.
Hoffman, Rachel W.
Hermann, Mark Christopher
Sher, Linda S.
Spotnitz, Russell H.
Genyk, Yuri S.
Schorn, Ian J.
Gillen, Daniel L.
White, Bobby L.
Miller, Bruce G.
Manson, Roberto J.
SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study
title SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study
title_full SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study
title_fullStr SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study
title_full_unstemmed SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study
title_short SPOT GRADE II: Clinical Validation of a New Method for Reproducibly Quantifying Surgical Wound Bleeding: Prospective, Multicenter, Multispecialty, Single-Arm Study
title_sort spot grade ii: clinical validation of a new method for reproducibly quantifying surgical wound bleeding: prospective, multicenter, multispecialty, single-arm study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32703005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620936340
work_keys_str_mv AT gaizodanieljdel spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT spotnitzwilliamd spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT hoffmanrachelw spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT hermannmarkchristopher spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT sherlindas spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT spotnitzrussellh spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT genykyuris spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT schornianj spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT gillendaniell spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT whitebobbyl spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT millerbruceg spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy
AT mansonrobertoj spotgradeiiclinicalvalidationofanewmethodforreproduciblyquantifyingsurgicalwoundbleedingprospectivemulticentermultispecialtysinglearmstudy