Cargando…

Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems

Leading up to the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 15, there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet, it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riggio, Jason, Baillie, Jonathan E. M., Brumby, Steven, Ellis, Erle, Kennedy, Christina M., Oakleaf, James R., Tait, Alex, Tepe, Therese, Theobald, David M., Venter, Oscar, Watson, James E. M., Jacobson, Andrew P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15109
_version_ 1783563481737330688
author Riggio, Jason
Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
Brumby, Steven
Ellis, Erle
Kennedy, Christina M.
Oakleaf, James R.
Tait, Alex
Tepe, Therese
Theobald, David M.
Venter, Oscar
Watson, James E. M.
Jacobson, Andrew P.
author_facet Riggio, Jason
Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
Brumby, Steven
Ellis, Erle
Kennedy, Christina M.
Oakleaf, James R.
Tait, Alex
Tepe, Therese
Theobald, David M.
Venter, Oscar
Watson, James E. M.
Jacobson, Andrew P.
author_sort Riggio, Jason
collection PubMed
description Leading up to the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 15, there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet, it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20%–34%) and low (48%–56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non‐permanent ice‐ or snow‐covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% of land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7383735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73837352020-07-27 Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems Riggio, Jason Baillie, Jonathan E. M. Brumby, Steven Ellis, Erle Kennedy, Christina M. Oakleaf, James R. Tait, Alex Tepe, Therese Theobald, David M. Venter, Oscar Watson, James E. M. Jacobson, Andrew P. Glob Chang Biol Primary Research Articles Leading up to the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 15, there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet, it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20%–34%) and low (48%–56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non‐permanent ice‐ or snow‐covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% of land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-05 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7383735/ /pubmed/32500604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15109 Text en © 2020 National Geographic Society. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Primary Research Articles
Riggio, Jason
Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
Brumby, Steven
Ellis, Erle
Kennedy, Christina M.
Oakleaf, James R.
Tait, Alex
Tepe, Therese
Theobald, David M.
Venter, Oscar
Watson, James E. M.
Jacobson, Andrew P.
Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_full Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_fullStr Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_short Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
title_sort global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving earth’s remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems
topic Primary Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32500604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15109
work_keys_str_mv AT riggiojason globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT bailliejonathanem globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT brumbysteven globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT elliserle globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT kennedychristinam globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT oakleafjamesr globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT taitalex globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT tepetherese globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT theobalddavidm globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT venteroscar globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT watsonjamesem globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems
AT jacobsonandrewp globalhumaninfluencemapsrevealclearopportunitiesinconservingearthsremainingintactterrestrialecosystems