Cargando…

Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement

PURPOSE: Placental function is key for successful human pregnancies. Perfusion may be a sensitive marker for the in vivo assessment of placental function. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI enables noninvasive measurement of tissue perfusion and it was recently suggested that ASL with velocity‐selecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harteveld, Anita A., Hutter, Jana, Franklin, Suzanne L., Jackson, Laurence H., Rutherford, Mary, Hajnal, Joseph V., van Osch, Matthias J. P., Bos, Clemens, De Vita, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28240
_version_ 1783563546615873536
author Harteveld, Anita A.
Hutter, Jana
Franklin, Suzanne L.
Jackson, Laurence H.
Rutherford, Mary
Hajnal, Joseph V.
van Osch, Matthias J. P.
Bos, Clemens
De Vita, Enrico
author_facet Harteveld, Anita A.
Hutter, Jana
Franklin, Suzanne L.
Jackson, Laurence H.
Rutherford, Mary
Hajnal, Joseph V.
van Osch, Matthias J. P.
Bos, Clemens
De Vita, Enrico
author_sort Harteveld, Anita A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Placental function is key for successful human pregnancies. Perfusion may be a sensitive marker for the in vivo assessment of placental function. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI enables noninvasive measurement of tissue perfusion and it was recently suggested that ASL with velocity‐selective (VS) labeling could be advantageous in the placenta. We systematically evaluated essential VS‐ASL sequence parameters to determine optimal settings for efficient placental perfusion measurements. METHODS: Eleven pregnant women were scanned at 3T using VS‐ASL with 2D multislice echo planar imaging (EPI)‐readout. One reference VS‐ASL scan was acquired in all subjects; within subgroups the following parameters were systematically varied: cutoff velocity, velocity encoding direction, and inflow time. Visual evaluation and region of interest analyses were performed to compare perfusion signal differences between acquisitions. RESULTS: In all subjects, a perfusion pattern with clear hyperintense focal regions was observed. Perfusion signal decreased with inflow time and cutoff velocity. Subject‐specific dependence on velocity encoding direction was observed. High temporal signal‐to‐noise ratios with high contrast on the perfusion images between the hyperintense regions and placental tissue were seen at ~1.6 cm/s cutoff velocity and ~1000 ms inflow time. Evaluation of measurements at multiple inflow times revealed differences in blood flow dynamics between placental regions. CONCLUSION: Placental perfusion measurements are feasible at 3T using VS‐ASL with 2D multislice EPI‐readout. A clear dependence of perfusion signal on VS labeling parameters and inflow time was demonstrated. Whereas multiple parameter combinations may advance the interpretation of placental circulation dynamics, this study provides a basis to select an effective set of parameters for the observation of placenta perfusion natural history and its potential pathological changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73840552020-07-28 Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement Harteveld, Anita A. Hutter, Jana Franklin, Suzanne L. Jackson, Laurence H. Rutherford, Mary Hajnal, Joseph V. van Osch, Matthias J. P. Bos, Clemens De Vita, Enrico Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Placental function is key for successful human pregnancies. Perfusion may be a sensitive marker for the in vivo assessment of placental function. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI enables noninvasive measurement of tissue perfusion and it was recently suggested that ASL with velocity‐selective (VS) labeling could be advantageous in the placenta. We systematically evaluated essential VS‐ASL sequence parameters to determine optimal settings for efficient placental perfusion measurements. METHODS: Eleven pregnant women were scanned at 3T using VS‐ASL with 2D multislice echo planar imaging (EPI)‐readout. One reference VS‐ASL scan was acquired in all subjects; within subgroups the following parameters were systematically varied: cutoff velocity, velocity encoding direction, and inflow time. Visual evaluation and region of interest analyses were performed to compare perfusion signal differences between acquisitions. RESULTS: In all subjects, a perfusion pattern with clear hyperintense focal regions was observed. Perfusion signal decreased with inflow time and cutoff velocity. Subject‐specific dependence on velocity encoding direction was observed. High temporal signal‐to‐noise ratios with high contrast on the perfusion images between the hyperintense regions and placental tissue were seen at ~1.6 cm/s cutoff velocity and ~1000 ms inflow time. Evaluation of measurements at multiple inflow times revealed differences in blood flow dynamics between placental regions. CONCLUSION: Placental perfusion measurements are feasible at 3T using VS‐ASL with 2D multislice EPI‐readout. A clear dependence of perfusion signal on VS labeling parameters and inflow time was demonstrated. Whereas multiple parameter combinations may advance the interpretation of placental circulation dynamics, this study provides a basis to select an effective set of parameters for the observation of placenta perfusion natural history and its potential pathological changes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-06 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7384055/ /pubmed/32141655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28240 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
Harteveld, Anita A.
Hutter, Jana
Franklin, Suzanne L.
Jackson, Laurence H.
Rutherford, Mary
Hajnal, Joseph V.
van Osch, Matthias J. P.
Bos, Clemens
De Vita, Enrico
Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
title Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
title_full Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
title_fullStr Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
title_full_unstemmed Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
title_short Systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
title_sort systematic evaluation of velocity‐selective arterial spin labeling settings for placental perfusion measurement
topic Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32141655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28240
work_keys_str_mv AT harteveldanitaa systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT hutterjana systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT franklinsuzannel systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT jacksonlaurenceh systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT rutherfordmary systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT hajnaljosephv systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT vanoschmatthiasjp systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT bosclemens systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement
AT devitaenrico systematicevaluationofvelocityselectivearterialspinlabelingsettingsforplacentalperfusionmeasurement