Cargando…
Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cost‐effective screening strategies are needed to make hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination a reality. We determined if birth cohort screening is cost‐effective in Italy. METHODS: A model was developed to quantify screening and healthcare costs associated with HCV. The model‐esti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.14408 |
_version_ | 1783563558427033600 |
---|---|
author | Kondili, Loreta A. Gamkrelidze, Ivane Blach, Sarah Marcellusi, Andrea Galli, Massimo Petta, Salvatore Puoti, Massimo Vella, Stefano Razavi, Homie Craxi, Antonio Mennini, Francesco S. |
author_facet | Kondili, Loreta A. Gamkrelidze, Ivane Blach, Sarah Marcellusi, Andrea Galli, Massimo Petta, Salvatore Puoti, Massimo Vella, Stefano Razavi, Homie Craxi, Antonio Mennini, Francesco S. |
author_sort | Kondili, Loreta A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cost‐effective screening strategies are needed to make hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination a reality. We determined if birth cohort screening is cost‐effective in Italy. METHODS: A model was developed to quantify screening and healthcare costs associated with HCV. The model‐estimated prevalence of undiagnosed HCV was used to calculate the antibody screens needed annually, with a €25 000 cost‐effectiveness threshold. Outcomes were assessed under the status quo and a scenario that met the World Health Organization's targets for elimination of HCV. The elimination scenario was assessed under five screening strategies. RESULTS: A graduated birth cohort screening strategy (graduated screening 1: 1968‐1987 birth cohorts, then expanding to 1948‐1967 cohorts) was the least costly. This strategy would gain approximately 144 000 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) by 2031 and result in an 89.3% reduction in HCV cases, compared to an 89.6%, 89.0%, 89.7% and 88.7% reduction for inversed graduated screening, 1948‐77 birth cohort, 1958‐77 birth cohort and universal screening, respectively. Graduated screening 1 yielded the lowest incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3552 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, a graduated screening scenario is the most cost‐effective strategy. Other countries could consider a similar birth cohort approach when developing HCV screening strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7384106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73841062020-07-28 Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy Kondili, Loreta A. Gamkrelidze, Ivane Blach, Sarah Marcellusi, Andrea Galli, Massimo Petta, Salvatore Puoti, Massimo Vella, Stefano Razavi, Homie Craxi, Antonio Mennini, Francesco S. Liver Int Liver Disease and Public Health BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cost‐effective screening strategies are needed to make hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination a reality. We determined if birth cohort screening is cost‐effective in Italy. METHODS: A model was developed to quantify screening and healthcare costs associated with HCV. The model‐estimated prevalence of undiagnosed HCV was used to calculate the antibody screens needed annually, with a €25 000 cost‐effectiveness threshold. Outcomes were assessed under the status quo and a scenario that met the World Health Organization's targets for elimination of HCV. The elimination scenario was assessed under five screening strategies. RESULTS: A graduated birth cohort screening strategy (graduated screening 1: 1968‐1987 birth cohorts, then expanding to 1948‐1967 cohorts) was the least costly. This strategy would gain approximately 144 000 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) by 2031 and result in an 89.3% reduction in HCV cases, compared to an 89.6%, 89.0%, 89.7% and 88.7% reduction for inversed graduated screening, 1948‐77 birth cohort, 1958‐77 birth cohort and universal screening, respectively. Graduated screening 1 yielded the lowest incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3552 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, a graduated screening scenario is the most cost‐effective strategy. Other countries could consider a similar birth cohort approach when developing HCV screening strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-02 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7384106/ /pubmed/32078234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.14408 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Liver Disease and Public Health Kondili, Loreta A. Gamkrelidze, Ivane Blach, Sarah Marcellusi, Andrea Galli, Massimo Petta, Salvatore Puoti, Massimo Vella, Stefano Razavi, Homie Craxi, Antonio Mennini, Francesco S. Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy |
title | Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy |
title_full | Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy |
title_fullStr | Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy |
title_short | Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy |
title_sort | optimization of hepatitis c virus screening strategies by birth cohort in italy |
topic | Liver Disease and Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32078234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/liv.14408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kondililoretaa optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT gamkrelidzeivane optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT blachsarah optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT marcellusiandrea optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT gallimassimo optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT pettasalvatore optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT puotimassimo optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT vellastefano optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT razavihomie optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT craxiantonio optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT menninifrancescos optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly AT optimizationofhepatitiscvirusscreeningstrategiesbybirthcohortinitaly |