Cargando…

Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples

AIM: To determine the most effective DNA extraction method for bacteria in faecal samples. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: This study assessed five commercial methods, that is, NucliSens easyMag, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit, PureLink Microbiome DNA purification kit, QIAamp PowerFecal DNA kit and RNeasy PowerMi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gryp, T., Glorieux, G., Joossens, M., Vaneechoutte, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14608
_version_ 1783563559347683328
author Gryp, T.
Glorieux, G.
Joossens, M.
Vaneechoutte, M.
author_facet Gryp, T.
Glorieux, G.
Joossens, M.
Vaneechoutte, M.
author_sort Gryp, T.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the most effective DNA extraction method for bacteria in faecal samples. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: This study assessed five commercial methods, that is, NucliSens easyMag, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit, PureLink Microbiome DNA purification kit, QIAamp PowerFecal DNA kit and RNeasy PowerMicrobiome kit, of which the latter has been optimized for DNA extraction. The DNA quantity and quality were determined using Nanodrop, Qubit and qPCR. The PowerMicrobiome kit recovered the highest DNA concentration, whereby this kit also recovered the highest gene copy number of Gram positives, Gram negatives and total bacteria. Furthermore, the PowerMicrobiome kit in combination with mechanical pre‐treatment (bead beating) and with combined enzymatic and mechanical pre‐treatment (proteinase K+mutanolysin+bead beating) was more effective than without pre‐treatment. CONCLUSION: From the five DNA extraction methods that were compared, the PowerMicrobiome kit, preceded by bead beating, which is standard included, was found to be the most effective DNA extraction method for bacteria in faecal samples. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The quantity and quality of DNA extracted from human faecal samples is a first important step to optimize molecular methods. Here we have shown that the PowerMicrobiome kit is an effective DNA extraction method for bacterial cells in faecal samples for downstream qPCR purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73841102020-07-28 Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples Gryp, T. Glorieux, G. Joossens, M. Vaneechoutte, M. J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIM: To determine the most effective DNA extraction method for bacteria in faecal samples. MATERIALS AND RESULTS: This study assessed five commercial methods, that is, NucliSens easyMag, QIAamp DNA Stool Mini kit, PureLink Microbiome DNA purification kit, QIAamp PowerFecal DNA kit and RNeasy PowerMicrobiome kit, of which the latter has been optimized for DNA extraction. The DNA quantity and quality were determined using Nanodrop, Qubit and qPCR. The PowerMicrobiome kit recovered the highest DNA concentration, whereby this kit also recovered the highest gene copy number of Gram positives, Gram negatives and total bacteria. Furthermore, the PowerMicrobiome kit in combination with mechanical pre‐treatment (bead beating) and with combined enzymatic and mechanical pre‐treatment (proteinase K+mutanolysin+bead beating) was more effective than without pre‐treatment. CONCLUSION: From the five DNA extraction methods that were compared, the PowerMicrobiome kit, preceded by bead beating, which is standard included, was found to be the most effective DNA extraction method for bacteria in faecal samples. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The quantity and quality of DNA extracted from human faecal samples is a first important step to optimize molecular methods. Here we have shown that the PowerMicrobiome kit is an effective DNA extraction method for bacterial cells in faecal samples for downstream qPCR purpose. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-20 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7384110/ /pubmed/32034968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14608 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gryp, T.
Glorieux, G.
Joossens, M.
Vaneechoutte, M.
Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
title Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
title_full Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
title_fullStr Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
title_short Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
title_sort comparison of five assays for dna extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32034968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.14608
work_keys_str_mv AT grypt comparisonoffiveassaysfordnaextractionfrombacterialcellsinhumanfaecalsamples
AT glorieuxg comparisonoffiveassaysfordnaextractionfrombacterialcellsinhumanfaecalsamples
AT joossensm comparisonoffiveassaysfordnaextractionfrombacterialcellsinhumanfaecalsamples
AT vaneechouttem comparisonoffiveassaysfordnaextractionfrombacterialcellsinhumanfaecalsamples