Cargando…
Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 31% of all global deaths. Primary prevention strategies are needed to improve longer-term adherence to statins and healthy lifestyle behaviours to reduce risk in people at risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Pragmatic randomised controlled t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01664-0 |
_version_ | 1783563584526090240 |
---|---|
author | Byrne, Jo L. Dallosso, Helen M. Rogers, Stephen Gray, Laura J. Waheed, Ghazala Patel, Prashanth Gupta, Pankaj Doherty, Yvonne Davies, Melanie J. Khunti, Kamlesh |
author_facet | Byrne, Jo L. Dallosso, Helen M. Rogers, Stephen Gray, Laura J. Waheed, Ghazala Patel, Prashanth Gupta, Pankaj Doherty, Yvonne Davies, Melanie J. Khunti, Kamlesh |
author_sort | Byrne, Jo L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 31% of all global deaths. Primary prevention strategies are needed to improve longer-term adherence to statins and healthy lifestyle behaviours to reduce risk in people at risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial recruited between May 2016 and March 2017 from primary care practices, England. Participants (n = 212) prescribed statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with total cholesterol level ≥ 5 mmol/l were randomised: 105 to the intervention group and 107 to the control group, stratified by age and sex. The 3R intervention involved two facilitated, structured group education sessions focusing on medication adherence to statins, lifestyle behaviours and cardiovascular risk, with 44 weeks of medication reminders and motivational text messages and two supportive, coaching phone calls (at approximately 2 weeks and 6 months). The control group continued with usual clinical care. Both groups received a basic information leaflet. The primary outcome was medication adherence to statins objectively measured by a biochemical urine test. Self-reported adherence and practice prescription data provided additional measures. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol profile, blood pressure, anthropometric data, cardiovascular risk score, and self-reported lifestyle behaviours and psychological measures (health/medication beliefs, quality of life, health status). All outcomes were assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline adherence to statins was 47% (control) and 62% (intervention). No significant difference between the groups found for medication adherence to statins using either the urine test (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.06, P = 0.968) or other measures. This may have been due to the higher than expected adherence levels at baseline. The adjusted mean difference between the groups (in favour of the intervention group) for diastolic blood pressure (− 4.28 mmHg (95% CI − 0.98 to − 1.58, P = 0.002)) and waist circumference (− 2.55 cm (95% CI − 4.55 to − 0.55, P = 0.012)). The intervention group also showed greater perceived control of treatment and more coherent understanding of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: The 3R programme successfully led to longer-term improvements in important clinical lifestyle indicators but no improvement in medication adherence, raising questions about the suitability of such a broad, multiple risk factor approach for improving medication adherence for primary prevention of CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN16863160), March 11, 2006. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7384223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73842232020-07-28 Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial Byrne, Jo L. Dallosso, Helen M. Rogers, Stephen Gray, Laura J. Waheed, Ghazala Patel, Prashanth Gupta, Pankaj Doherty, Yvonne Davies, Melanie J. Khunti, Kamlesh BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 31% of all global deaths. Primary prevention strategies are needed to improve longer-term adherence to statins and healthy lifestyle behaviours to reduce risk in people at risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial recruited between May 2016 and March 2017 from primary care practices, England. Participants (n = 212) prescribed statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with total cholesterol level ≥ 5 mmol/l were randomised: 105 to the intervention group and 107 to the control group, stratified by age and sex. The 3R intervention involved two facilitated, structured group education sessions focusing on medication adherence to statins, lifestyle behaviours and cardiovascular risk, with 44 weeks of medication reminders and motivational text messages and two supportive, coaching phone calls (at approximately 2 weeks and 6 months). The control group continued with usual clinical care. Both groups received a basic information leaflet. The primary outcome was medication adherence to statins objectively measured by a biochemical urine test. Self-reported adherence and practice prescription data provided additional measures. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol profile, blood pressure, anthropometric data, cardiovascular risk score, and self-reported lifestyle behaviours and psychological measures (health/medication beliefs, quality of life, health status). All outcomes were assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline adherence to statins was 47% (control) and 62% (intervention). No significant difference between the groups found for medication adherence to statins using either the urine test (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.06, P = 0.968) or other measures. This may have been due to the higher than expected adherence levels at baseline. The adjusted mean difference between the groups (in favour of the intervention group) for diastolic blood pressure (− 4.28 mmHg (95% CI − 0.98 to − 1.58, P = 0.002)) and waist circumference (− 2.55 cm (95% CI − 4.55 to − 0.55, P = 0.012)). The intervention group also showed greater perceived control of treatment and more coherent understanding of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: The 3R programme successfully led to longer-term improvements in important clinical lifestyle indicators but no improvement in medication adherence, raising questions about the suitability of such a broad, multiple risk factor approach for improving medication adherence for primary prevention of CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN16863160), March 11, 2006. BioMed Central 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7384223/ /pubmed/32713349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01664-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Byrne, Jo L. Dallosso, Helen M. Rogers, Stephen Gray, Laura J. Waheed, Ghazala Patel, Prashanth Gupta, Pankaj Doherty, Yvonne Davies, Melanie J. Khunti, Kamlesh Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of the ready to reduce risk (3r) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01664-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byrnejol effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dallossohelenm effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rogersstephen effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT graylauraj effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT waheedghazala effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT patelprashanth effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT guptapankaj effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dohertyyvonne effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT daviesmelaniej effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT khuntikamlesh effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial |