Cargando…

Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 31% of all global deaths. Primary prevention strategies are needed to improve longer-term adherence to statins and healthy lifestyle behaviours to reduce risk in people at risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Pragmatic randomised controlled t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, Jo L., Dallosso, Helen M., Rogers, Stephen, Gray, Laura J., Waheed, Ghazala, Patel, Prashanth, Gupta, Pankaj, Doherty, Yvonne, Davies, Melanie J., Khunti, Kamlesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01664-0
_version_ 1783563584526090240
author Byrne, Jo L.
Dallosso, Helen M.
Rogers, Stephen
Gray, Laura J.
Waheed, Ghazala
Patel, Prashanth
Gupta, Pankaj
Doherty, Yvonne
Davies, Melanie J.
Khunti, Kamlesh
author_facet Byrne, Jo L.
Dallosso, Helen M.
Rogers, Stephen
Gray, Laura J.
Waheed, Ghazala
Patel, Prashanth
Gupta, Pankaj
Doherty, Yvonne
Davies, Melanie J.
Khunti, Kamlesh
author_sort Byrne, Jo L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 31% of all global deaths. Primary prevention strategies are needed to improve longer-term adherence to statins and healthy lifestyle behaviours to reduce risk in people at risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial recruited between May 2016 and March 2017 from primary care practices, England. Participants (n = 212) prescribed statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with total cholesterol level ≥ 5 mmol/l were randomised: 105 to the intervention group and 107 to the control group, stratified by age and sex. The 3R intervention involved two facilitated, structured group education sessions focusing on medication adherence to statins, lifestyle behaviours and cardiovascular risk, with 44 weeks of medication reminders and motivational text messages and two supportive, coaching phone calls (at approximately 2 weeks and 6 months). The control group continued with usual clinical care. Both groups received a basic information leaflet. The primary outcome was medication adherence to statins objectively measured by a biochemical urine test. Self-reported adherence and practice prescription data provided additional measures. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol profile, blood pressure, anthropometric data, cardiovascular risk score, and self-reported lifestyle behaviours and psychological measures (health/medication beliefs, quality of life, health status). All outcomes were assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline adherence to statins was 47% (control) and 62% (intervention). No significant difference between the groups found for medication adherence to statins using either the urine test (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.06, P = 0.968) or other measures. This may have been due to the higher than expected adherence levels at baseline. The adjusted mean difference between the groups (in favour of the intervention group) for diastolic blood pressure (− 4.28 mmHg (95% CI − 0.98 to − 1.58, P = 0.002)) and waist circumference (− 2.55 cm (95% CI − 4.55 to − 0.55, P = 0.012)). The intervention group also showed greater perceived control of treatment and more coherent understanding of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: The 3R programme successfully led to longer-term improvements in important clinical lifestyle indicators but no improvement in medication adherence, raising questions about the suitability of such a broad, multiple risk factor approach for improving medication adherence for primary prevention of CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN16863160), March 11, 2006.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73842232020-07-28 Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial Byrne, Jo L. Dallosso, Helen M. Rogers, Stephen Gray, Laura J. Waheed, Ghazala Patel, Prashanth Gupta, Pankaj Doherty, Yvonne Davies, Melanie J. Khunti, Kamlesh BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is responsible for 31% of all global deaths. Primary prevention strategies are needed to improve longer-term adherence to statins and healthy lifestyle behaviours to reduce risk in people at risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial recruited between May 2016 and March 2017 from primary care practices, England. Participants (n = 212) prescribed statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with total cholesterol level ≥ 5 mmol/l were randomised: 105 to the intervention group and 107 to the control group, stratified by age and sex. The 3R intervention involved two facilitated, structured group education sessions focusing on medication adherence to statins, lifestyle behaviours and cardiovascular risk, with 44 weeks of medication reminders and motivational text messages and two supportive, coaching phone calls (at approximately 2 weeks and 6 months). The control group continued with usual clinical care. Both groups received a basic information leaflet. The primary outcome was medication adherence to statins objectively measured by a biochemical urine test. Self-reported adherence and practice prescription data provided additional measures. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol profile, blood pressure, anthropometric data, cardiovascular risk score, and self-reported lifestyle behaviours and psychological measures (health/medication beliefs, quality of life, health status). All outcomes were assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline adherence to statins was 47% (control) and 62% (intervention). No significant difference between the groups found for medication adherence to statins using either the urine test (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.06, P = 0.968) or other measures. This may have been due to the higher than expected adherence levels at baseline. The adjusted mean difference between the groups (in favour of the intervention group) for diastolic blood pressure (− 4.28 mmHg (95% CI − 0.98 to − 1.58, P = 0.002)) and waist circumference (− 2.55 cm (95% CI − 4.55 to − 0.55, P = 0.012)). The intervention group also showed greater perceived control of treatment and more coherent understanding of the condition. CONCLUSIONS: The 3R programme successfully led to longer-term improvements in important clinical lifestyle indicators but no improvement in medication adherence, raising questions about the suitability of such a broad, multiple risk factor approach for improving medication adherence for primary prevention of CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN16863160), March 11, 2006. BioMed Central 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7384223/ /pubmed/32713349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01664-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Byrne, Jo L.
Dallosso, Helen M.
Rogers, Stephen
Gray, Laura J.
Waheed, Ghazala
Patel, Prashanth
Gupta, Pankaj
Doherty, Yvonne
Davies, Melanie J.
Khunti, Kamlesh
Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of the Ready to Reduce Risk (3R) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of the ready to reduce risk (3r) complex intervention for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32713349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01664-0
work_keys_str_mv AT byrnejol effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dallossohelenm effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rogersstephen effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT graylauraj effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waheedghazala effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT patelprashanth effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT guptapankaj effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dohertyyvonne effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daviesmelaniej effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT khuntikamlesh effectivenessofthereadytoreducerisk3rcomplexinterventionfortheprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseaseapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial