Cargando…

Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations

OBJECTIVE: This cross‐sectional study aimed to assess fire risk in fire hazardous zones (FHZ) at the dispenser areas of gasoline stations. METHODS: There were 47 stations chosen for fire risk assessment and two zones around the dispenser area of each station were assessed. The assessments were carri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaiklieng, Sunisa, Dacherngkhao, Thawatchai, Suggaravetsiri, Pornnapa, Pruktharathikul, Vichai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12137
_version_ 1783563614085447680
author Chaiklieng, Sunisa
Dacherngkhao, Thawatchai
Suggaravetsiri, Pornnapa
Pruktharathikul, Vichai
author_facet Chaiklieng, Sunisa
Dacherngkhao, Thawatchai
Suggaravetsiri, Pornnapa
Pruktharathikul, Vichai
author_sort Chaiklieng, Sunisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This cross‐sectional study aimed to assess fire risk in fire hazardous zones (FHZ) at the dispenser areas of gasoline stations. METHODS: There were 47 stations chosen for fire risk assessment and two zones around the dispenser area of each station were assessed. The assessments were carried out by applying the matrix (3 × 4) of fire risk assessment by multipliers of opportunities level of hazard occurrence and the subsequent severity of the incident. RESULTS: Across the 47 gasoline stations studied, there was an average of 23 ± 12 nozzles and none had vapor recovery systems (VRS) on dispenser nozzles. The average daily amount of gasoline sold was 3382 L. Each gasoline station had an average of 10 ± 5 workers/station; they all worked within a 1.5 meter radius of the dispenser (FHZ‐I); and they used cellphones >4 hours/day. The average level of flammable gas was in the range 1.3%‐7.4% LEL‐UEL (6.2% ± 5.2%). The fire risk was found to be an intolerable risk in FHZ‐I at 40 stations (85.1%) and FHZ‐II at 10 stations (21.3%). A total of 18 stations were ranked as having a substantial risk, whereas 19 stations also had a moderate risk in FHZ‐II; those levels correlated with the station locations and the quantity of fuel sold. CONCLUSION: It suggests that high risk must be controlled by using preventive and safety actions: eliminating fire ignition sources, such as by cellphone prohibition, and inspection of electrostatic discharges, engineering control with grounding when refuelling, signposting of hazardous zones, and VRS installation on dispenser nozzles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73844802020-07-28 Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations Chaiklieng, Sunisa Dacherngkhao, Thawatchai Suggaravetsiri, Pornnapa Pruktharathikul, Vichai J Occup Health Original Articles OBJECTIVE: This cross‐sectional study aimed to assess fire risk in fire hazardous zones (FHZ) at the dispenser areas of gasoline stations. METHODS: There were 47 stations chosen for fire risk assessment and two zones around the dispenser area of each station were assessed. The assessments were carried out by applying the matrix (3 × 4) of fire risk assessment by multipliers of opportunities level of hazard occurrence and the subsequent severity of the incident. RESULTS: Across the 47 gasoline stations studied, there was an average of 23 ± 12 nozzles and none had vapor recovery systems (VRS) on dispenser nozzles. The average daily amount of gasoline sold was 3382 L. Each gasoline station had an average of 10 ± 5 workers/station; they all worked within a 1.5 meter radius of the dispenser (FHZ‐I); and they used cellphones >4 hours/day. The average level of flammable gas was in the range 1.3%‐7.4% LEL‐UEL (6.2% ± 5.2%). The fire risk was found to be an intolerable risk in FHZ‐I at 40 stations (85.1%) and FHZ‐II at 10 stations (21.3%). A total of 18 stations were ranked as having a substantial risk, whereas 19 stations also had a moderate risk in FHZ‐II; those levels correlated with the station locations and the quantity of fuel sold. CONCLUSION: It suggests that high risk must be controlled by using preventive and safety actions: eliminating fire ignition sources, such as by cellphone prohibition, and inspection of electrostatic discharges, engineering control with grounding when refuelling, signposting of hazardous zones, and VRS installation on dispenser nozzles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7384480/ /pubmed/32716560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12137 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chaiklieng, Sunisa
Dacherngkhao, Thawatchai
Suggaravetsiri, Pornnapa
Pruktharathikul, Vichai
Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
title Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
title_full Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
title_fullStr Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
title_full_unstemmed Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
title_short Fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
title_sort fire risk assessment in fire hazardous zones of gasoline stations
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12137
work_keys_str_mv AT chaikliengsunisa fireriskassessmentinfirehazardouszonesofgasolinestations
AT dacherngkhaothawatchai fireriskassessmentinfirehazardouszonesofgasolinestations
AT suggaravetsiripornnapa fireriskassessmentinfirehazardouszonesofgasolinestations
AT pruktharathikulvichai fireriskassessmentinfirehazardouszonesofgasolinestations