Cargando…

Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of upper extremity proprioceptive training on spasticity and functional motor skills in patients with chronic hemiplegia occurring after stroke. METHOD: Thirty chronic hemiplegic patients (17 females, mean age: 66.47±12.55 years) admitted to the Research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ocal, Numan Melik, Alaca, Nuray, Canbora, Mehmet Kerem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul Medeniyet University 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733757
http://dx.doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2020.48752
_version_ 1783563618836545536
author Ocal, Numan Melik
Alaca, Nuray
Canbora, Mehmet Kerem
author_facet Ocal, Numan Melik
Alaca, Nuray
Canbora, Mehmet Kerem
author_sort Ocal, Numan Melik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of upper extremity proprioceptive training on spasticity and functional motor skills in patients with chronic hemiplegia occurring after stroke. METHOD: Thirty chronic hemiplegic patients (17 females, mean age: 66.47±12.55 years) admitted to the Research Center with a diagnosis of chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group received a conventional physiotherapy program (PTR) for 5 days a week and the second group additionally received a proprioceptive training program (PTR-PT) for 5 days a week. Before and 6 weeks after the treatment modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor evaluation scale (FMA) and action-research-arm-test (ARAT) and motor activity log-28 scale (MAL-28) were applied. SSPS-22.0 program was used for statistical evaluation and p <0.05 was considered as the level of statistical significance RESULTS: There was no difference in MAS scores before and after treatment in the groups (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant improvement in both PTR (p<0.05) and PTR-PT groups (p<0.001) for the FMA, ARAT and MAL-28. scale scores. Although the results obtained in the PTR, and PT groups were more improved, there was a significant result in favor of PTR-PT only regarding the MAL-28 scale scores (p<0.05). It was determined that adding proprioception-based exercises had the greatest effect on FMA, ARAT and MAL-28 in the evaluation of the effect size (>0.3). CONCLUSION: It was observed that upper extremity proprioceptive training yielded better results in patients with chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke than conventional therapy in increasing the frequency and quality of movement in upper extremity. This result shows that proprioceptive training programs should be added to stroke rehabilitation methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Istanbul Medeniyet University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73845052020-07-29 Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients? Ocal, Numan Melik Alaca, Nuray Canbora, Mehmet Kerem Medeni Med J Original Study OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of upper extremity proprioceptive training on spasticity and functional motor skills in patients with chronic hemiplegia occurring after stroke. METHOD: Thirty chronic hemiplegic patients (17 females, mean age: 66.47±12.55 years) admitted to the Research Center with a diagnosis of chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group received a conventional physiotherapy program (PTR) for 5 days a week and the second group additionally received a proprioceptive training program (PTR-PT) for 5 days a week. Before and 6 weeks after the treatment modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor evaluation scale (FMA) and action-research-arm-test (ARAT) and motor activity log-28 scale (MAL-28) were applied. SSPS-22.0 program was used for statistical evaluation and p <0.05 was considered as the level of statistical significance RESULTS: There was no difference in MAS scores before and after treatment in the groups (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant improvement in both PTR (p<0.05) and PTR-PT groups (p<0.001) for the FMA, ARAT and MAL-28. scale scores. Although the results obtained in the PTR, and PT groups were more improved, there was a significant result in favor of PTR-PT only regarding the MAL-28 scale scores (p<0.05). It was determined that adding proprioception-based exercises had the greatest effect on FMA, ARAT and MAL-28 in the evaluation of the effect size (>0.3). CONCLUSION: It was observed that upper extremity proprioceptive training yielded better results in patients with chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke than conventional therapy in increasing the frequency and quality of movement in upper extremity. This result shows that proprioceptive training programs should be added to stroke rehabilitation methods. Istanbul Medeniyet University 2020 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7384505/ /pubmed/32733757 http://dx.doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2020.48752 Text en Copyright Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This journal is published by Logos Medical Publishing. Licenced by Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
spellingShingle Original Study
Ocal, Numan Melik
Alaca, Nuray
Canbora, Mehmet Kerem
Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
title Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
title_full Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
title_fullStr Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
title_full_unstemmed Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
title_short Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
title_sort does upper extremity proprioceptive training have an impact on functional outcomes in chronic stroke patients?
topic Original Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32733757
http://dx.doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2020.48752
work_keys_str_mv AT ocalnumanmelik doesupperextremityproprioceptivetraininghaveanimpactonfunctionaloutcomesinchronicstrokepatients
AT alacanuray doesupperextremityproprioceptivetraininghaveanimpactonfunctionaloutcomesinchronicstrokepatients
AT canboramehmetkerem doesupperextremityproprioceptivetraininghaveanimpactonfunctionaloutcomesinchronicstrokepatients