Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND: For stage IV lung cancer patients receiving add-on Viscum album L. (VA) treatment an improved overall survival was detected. Information regarding cost-effectiveness (CE) for comparisons between chemotherapy (CTx) and CTx plus additive VA in stage IV lung cancer treatment is limited. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thronicke, Anja, Reinhold, Thomas, von Trott, Philipp, Grah, Christian, Matthes, Burkhard, Matthes, Harald, Schad, Friedemann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236426
_version_ 1783563633396023296
author Thronicke, Anja
Reinhold, Thomas
von Trott, Philipp
Grah, Christian
Matthes, Burkhard
Matthes, Harald
Schad, Friedemann
author_facet Thronicke, Anja
Reinhold, Thomas
von Trott, Philipp
Grah, Christian
Matthes, Burkhard
Matthes, Harald
Schad, Friedemann
author_sort Thronicke, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For stage IV lung cancer patients receiving add-on Viscum album L. (VA) treatment an improved overall survival was detected. Information regarding cost-effectiveness (CE) for comparisons between chemotherapy (CTx) and CTx plus additive VA in stage IV lung cancer treatment is limited. The present study assessed the costs and cost-effectiveness of CTx plus VA (V) compared to CTx alone (C) for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treatment in a hospital in Germany. METHODS: In the observational real-world data study, data from the Network Oncology clinical registry were utilized. Enrolled stage IV lung cancer patients received the respective therapy (C or V) in a certified German Cancer Center. Cost and cost-effectiveness analyses from the hospital’s perspective were investigated on the basis of overall survival (OS) and routine financial controlling data. In addition, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. The primary result of the analysis was tested for robustness in a bootstrap-based sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: 118 patients (C: n = 86, V: n = 32) were included in the analysis, mean age 63.8 years, the proportion of male patients was 55.1%. Adjusted hospital’s total mean costs for patients from the C and V group were €16,289, 95%CI: 13,834€-18,744€ (over an adjusted mean OS time of 13.4 months) and €17,992, 95%CI: 13,658–22,326 (over an adjusted mean OS time of 19.1 months), respectively. The costs per additional OS year gained (ICER) with the V-therapy compared to C therapy were €3,586. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study suggest that the combined use of chemotherapy and VA was clinically effective and comparably cost-effective to chemotherapy alone in our analysed patient sample from the hospital’s perspective. Further randomized and prospective cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to complement our findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73846102020-08-05 Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients Thronicke, Anja Reinhold, Thomas von Trott, Philipp Grah, Christian Matthes, Burkhard Matthes, Harald Schad, Friedemann PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: For stage IV lung cancer patients receiving add-on Viscum album L. (VA) treatment an improved overall survival was detected. Information regarding cost-effectiveness (CE) for comparisons between chemotherapy (CTx) and CTx plus additive VA in stage IV lung cancer treatment is limited. The present study assessed the costs and cost-effectiveness of CTx plus VA (V) compared to CTx alone (C) for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treatment in a hospital in Germany. METHODS: In the observational real-world data study, data from the Network Oncology clinical registry were utilized. Enrolled stage IV lung cancer patients received the respective therapy (C or V) in a certified German Cancer Center. Cost and cost-effectiveness analyses from the hospital’s perspective were investigated on the basis of overall survival (OS) and routine financial controlling data. In addition, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. The primary result of the analysis was tested for robustness in a bootstrap-based sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: 118 patients (C: n = 86, V: n = 32) were included in the analysis, mean age 63.8 years, the proportion of male patients was 55.1%. Adjusted hospital’s total mean costs for patients from the C and V group were €16,289, 95%CI: 13,834€-18,744€ (over an adjusted mean OS time of 13.4 months) and €17,992, 95%CI: 13,658–22,326 (over an adjusted mean OS time of 19.1 months), respectively. The costs per additional OS year gained (ICER) with the V-therapy compared to C therapy were €3,586. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study suggest that the combined use of chemotherapy and VA was clinically effective and comparably cost-effective to chemotherapy alone in our analysed patient sample from the hospital’s perspective. Further randomized and prospective cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to complement our findings. Public Library of Science 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7384610/ /pubmed/32716969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236426 Text en © 2020 Thronicke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thronicke, Anja
Reinhold, Thomas
von Trott, Philipp
Grah, Christian
Matthes, Burkhard
Matthes, Harald
Schad, Friedemann
Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
title Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
title_full Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
title_short Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
title_sort cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on viscum album l. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage iv nsclc patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236426
work_keys_str_mv AT thronickeanja costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients
AT reinholdthomas costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients
AT vontrottphilipp costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients
AT grahchristian costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients
AT matthesburkhard costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients
AT matthesharald costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients
AT schadfriedemann costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients