Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients
BACKGROUND: For stage IV lung cancer patients receiving add-on Viscum album L. (VA) treatment an improved overall survival was detected. Information regarding cost-effectiveness (CE) for comparisons between chemotherapy (CTx) and CTx plus additive VA in stage IV lung cancer treatment is limited. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236426 |
_version_ | 1783563633396023296 |
---|---|
author | Thronicke, Anja Reinhold, Thomas von Trott, Philipp Grah, Christian Matthes, Burkhard Matthes, Harald Schad, Friedemann |
author_facet | Thronicke, Anja Reinhold, Thomas von Trott, Philipp Grah, Christian Matthes, Burkhard Matthes, Harald Schad, Friedemann |
author_sort | Thronicke, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For stage IV lung cancer patients receiving add-on Viscum album L. (VA) treatment an improved overall survival was detected. Information regarding cost-effectiveness (CE) for comparisons between chemotherapy (CTx) and CTx plus additive VA in stage IV lung cancer treatment is limited. The present study assessed the costs and cost-effectiveness of CTx plus VA (V) compared to CTx alone (C) for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treatment in a hospital in Germany. METHODS: In the observational real-world data study, data from the Network Oncology clinical registry were utilized. Enrolled stage IV lung cancer patients received the respective therapy (C or V) in a certified German Cancer Center. Cost and cost-effectiveness analyses from the hospital’s perspective were investigated on the basis of overall survival (OS) and routine financial controlling data. In addition, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. The primary result of the analysis was tested for robustness in a bootstrap-based sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: 118 patients (C: n = 86, V: n = 32) were included in the analysis, mean age 63.8 years, the proportion of male patients was 55.1%. Adjusted hospital’s total mean costs for patients from the C and V group were €16,289, 95%CI: 13,834€-18,744€ (over an adjusted mean OS time of 13.4 months) and €17,992, 95%CI: 13,658–22,326 (over an adjusted mean OS time of 19.1 months), respectively. The costs per additional OS year gained (ICER) with the V-therapy compared to C therapy were €3,586. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study suggest that the combined use of chemotherapy and VA was clinically effective and comparably cost-effective to chemotherapy alone in our analysed patient sample from the hospital’s perspective. Further randomized and prospective cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to complement our findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7384610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73846102020-08-05 Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients Thronicke, Anja Reinhold, Thomas von Trott, Philipp Grah, Christian Matthes, Burkhard Matthes, Harald Schad, Friedemann PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: For stage IV lung cancer patients receiving add-on Viscum album L. (VA) treatment an improved overall survival was detected. Information regarding cost-effectiveness (CE) for comparisons between chemotherapy (CTx) and CTx plus additive VA in stage IV lung cancer treatment is limited. The present study assessed the costs and cost-effectiveness of CTx plus VA (V) compared to CTx alone (C) for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treatment in a hospital in Germany. METHODS: In the observational real-world data study, data from the Network Oncology clinical registry were utilized. Enrolled stage IV lung cancer patients received the respective therapy (C or V) in a certified German Cancer Center. Cost and cost-effectiveness analyses from the hospital’s perspective were investigated on the basis of overall survival (OS) and routine financial controlling data. In addition, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. The primary result of the analysis was tested for robustness in a bootstrap-based sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: 118 patients (C: n = 86, V: n = 32) were included in the analysis, mean age 63.8 years, the proportion of male patients was 55.1%. Adjusted hospital’s total mean costs for patients from the C and V group were €16,289, 95%CI: 13,834€-18,744€ (over an adjusted mean OS time of 13.4 months) and €17,992, 95%CI: 13,658–22,326 (over an adjusted mean OS time of 19.1 months), respectively. The costs per additional OS year gained (ICER) with the V-therapy compared to C therapy were €3,586. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study suggest that the combined use of chemotherapy and VA was clinically effective and comparably cost-effective to chemotherapy alone in our analysed patient sample from the hospital’s perspective. Further randomized and prospective cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to complement our findings. Public Library of Science 2020-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7384610/ /pubmed/32716969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236426 Text en © 2020 Thronicke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Thronicke, Anja Reinhold, Thomas von Trott, Philipp Grah, Christian Matthes, Burkhard Matthes, Harald Schad, Friedemann Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients |
title | Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on viscum album l. therapy compared to chemotherapy in the treatment of stage iv nsclc patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32716969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thronickeanja costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients AT reinholdthomas costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients AT vontrottphilipp costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients AT grahchristian costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients AT matthesburkhard costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients AT matthesharald costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients AT schadfriedemann costeffectivenessofrealworldadministrationofchemotherapyandaddonviscumalbumltherapycomparedtochemotherapyinthetreatmentofstageivnsclcpatients |