Cargando…

Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review

Machine learning (ML) algorithms “learn” information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bazoukis, George, Stavrakis, Stavros, Zhou, Jiandong, Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra, Tse, Gary, Zhang, Qingpeng, Singh, Jagmeet P., Armoundas, Antonis A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3
_version_ 1783563675123056640
author Bazoukis, George
Stavrakis, Stavros
Zhou, Jiandong
Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra
Tse, Gary
Zhang, Qingpeng
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Armoundas, Antonis A.
author_facet Bazoukis, George
Stavrakis, Stavros
Zhou, Jiandong
Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra
Tse, Gary
Zhang, Qingpeng
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Armoundas, Antonis A.
author_sort Bazoukis, George
collection PubMed
description Machine learning (ML) algorithms “learn” information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart failure (HF) patients. We manually searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well the reference lists of the relevant review studies and included studies. Our search retrieved 122 relevant studies. These studies mainly refer to (a) the role of ML in the classification of HF patients into distinct categories which may require a different treatment strategy, (b) discrimination of HF patients from the healthy population or other diseases, (c) prediction of HF outcomes, (d) identification of HF patients from electronic records and identification of HF patients with similar characteristics who may benefit form a similar treatment strategy, (e) supporting the extraction of important data from clinical notes, and (f) prediction of outcomes in HF populations with implantable devices (left ventricular assist device, cardiac resynchronization therapy). We concluded that ML techniques may play an important role for the efficient construction of methodologies for diagnosis, management, and prediction of outcomes in HF patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7384870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73848702020-07-28 Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review Bazoukis, George Stavrakis, Stavros Zhou, Jiandong Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra Tse, Gary Zhang, Qingpeng Singh, Jagmeet P. Armoundas, Antonis A. Heart Fail Rev Article Machine learning (ML) algorithms “learn” information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart failure (HF) patients. We manually searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well the reference lists of the relevant review studies and included studies. Our search retrieved 122 relevant studies. These studies mainly refer to (a) the role of ML in the classification of HF patients into distinct categories which may require a different treatment strategy, (b) discrimination of HF patients from the healthy population or other diseases, (c) prediction of HF outcomes, (d) identification of HF patients from electronic records and identification of HF patients with similar characteristics who may benefit form a similar treatment strategy, (e) supporting the extraction of important data from clinical notes, and (f) prediction of outcomes in HF populations with implantable devices (left ventricular assist device, cardiac resynchronization therapy). We concluded that ML techniques may play an important role for the efficient construction of methodologies for diagnosis, management, and prediction of outcomes in HF patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7384870/ /pubmed/32720083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Bazoukis, George
Stavrakis, Stavros
Zhou, Jiandong
Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra
Tse, Gary
Zhang, Qingpeng
Singh, Jagmeet P.
Armoundas, Antonis A.
Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
title Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
title_full Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
title_fullStr Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
title_short Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
title_sort machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bazoukisgeorge machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT stavrakisstavros machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT zhoujiandong machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT bollepallisandeepchandra machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT tsegary machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT zhangqingpeng machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT singhjagmeetp machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview
AT armoundasantonisa machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview