Cargando…
Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review
Machine learning (ML) algorithms “learn” information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3 |
_version_ | 1783563675123056640 |
---|---|
author | Bazoukis, George Stavrakis, Stavros Zhou, Jiandong Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra Tse, Gary Zhang, Qingpeng Singh, Jagmeet P. Armoundas, Antonis A. |
author_facet | Bazoukis, George Stavrakis, Stavros Zhou, Jiandong Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra Tse, Gary Zhang, Qingpeng Singh, Jagmeet P. Armoundas, Antonis A. |
author_sort | Bazoukis, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | Machine learning (ML) algorithms “learn” information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart failure (HF) patients. We manually searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well the reference lists of the relevant review studies and included studies. Our search retrieved 122 relevant studies. These studies mainly refer to (a) the role of ML in the classification of HF patients into distinct categories which may require a different treatment strategy, (b) discrimination of HF patients from the healthy population or other diseases, (c) prediction of HF outcomes, (d) identification of HF patients from electronic records and identification of HF patients with similar characteristics who may benefit form a similar treatment strategy, (e) supporting the extraction of important data from clinical notes, and (f) prediction of outcomes in HF populations with implantable devices (left ventricular assist device, cardiac resynchronization therapy). We concluded that ML techniques may play an important role for the efficient construction of methodologies for diagnosis, management, and prediction of outcomes in HF patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7384870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73848702020-07-28 Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review Bazoukis, George Stavrakis, Stavros Zhou, Jiandong Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra Tse, Gary Zhang, Qingpeng Singh, Jagmeet P. Armoundas, Antonis A. Heart Fail Rev Article Machine learning (ML) algorithms “learn” information directly from data, and their performance improves proportionally with the number of high-quality samples. The aim of our systematic review is to present the state of the art regarding the implementation of ML techniques in the management of heart failure (HF) patients. We manually searched MEDLINE and Cochrane databases as well the reference lists of the relevant review studies and included studies. Our search retrieved 122 relevant studies. These studies mainly refer to (a) the role of ML in the classification of HF patients into distinct categories which may require a different treatment strategy, (b) discrimination of HF patients from the healthy population or other diseases, (c) prediction of HF outcomes, (d) identification of HF patients from electronic records and identification of HF patients with similar characteristics who may benefit form a similar treatment strategy, (e) supporting the extraction of important data from clinical notes, and (f) prediction of outcomes in HF populations with implantable devices (left ventricular assist device, cardiac resynchronization therapy). We concluded that ML techniques may play an important role for the efficient construction of methodologies for diagnosis, management, and prediction of outcomes in HF patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7384870/ /pubmed/32720083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Bazoukis, George Stavrakis, Stavros Zhou, Jiandong Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra Tse, Gary Zhang, Qingpeng Singh, Jagmeet P. Armoundas, Antonis A. Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
title | Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
title_full | Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
title_short | Machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
title_sort | machine learning versus conventional clinical methods in guiding management of heart failure patients—a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10007-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bazoukisgeorge machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT stavrakisstavros machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT zhoujiandong machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT bollepallisandeepchandra machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT tsegary machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT zhangqingpeng machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT singhjagmeetp machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview AT armoundasantonisa machinelearningversusconventionalclinicalmethodsinguidingmanagementofheartfailurepatientsasystematicreview |