Cargando…

Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The ideal high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) cutoff for identifying those at low risk of 30 days events is debated; however, the 99th percentile overall or gender-specific upper reference limit (URL) is most commonly used. The magnitude of risk and the best management strategy for those wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoud, Osama, Mahmaljy, Hadi, Youniss, Mohamed, Hernandez Campoverde, Edwin, Elias, Hadi, Stanton, Matthew, Patel, Maulin, Hashmi, Insia, Young, Katelyn, Kuppuraju, Rajesh, Jacobs, Steven, Alsaid, Amro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100586
_version_ 1783563786074980352
author Mahmoud, Osama
Mahmaljy, Hadi
Youniss, Mohamed
Hernandez Campoverde, Edwin
Elias, Hadi
Stanton, Matthew
Patel, Maulin
Hashmi, Insia
Young, Katelyn
Kuppuraju, Rajesh
Jacobs, Steven
Alsaid, Amro
author_facet Mahmoud, Osama
Mahmaljy, Hadi
Youniss, Mohamed
Hernandez Campoverde, Edwin
Elias, Hadi
Stanton, Matthew
Patel, Maulin
Hashmi, Insia
Young, Katelyn
Kuppuraju, Rajesh
Jacobs, Steven
Alsaid, Amro
author_sort Mahmoud, Osama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ideal high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) cutoff for identifying those at low risk of 30 days events is debated; however, the 99th percentile overall or gender-specific upper reference limit (URL) is most commonly used. The magnitude of risk and the best management strategy for those with low-level hsTn elevation hasn’t been extensively studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including 4396 chest pain patients (542 with low-level hsTn elevation) who ruled out for myocardial infarction (MI), had a stable high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) levels (defined as < 5 ng/l inter-measurements increase in hsTnT levels), and were discharged from the emergency department without further ischemic testing. The aim of the study was to compare the 30-day incidence of adverse cardiac events (ACE) between patients with undetectable high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) (group 1), patients with hsTnT within the 99th percentile sex-specific URL (group 2), and patients with low-level hsTnT elevation (between the 99th percentile URL and ≤ 50 ng/l) (group 3). RESULTS: 30-day event rates were very low 0.1%, 0.6%, and 0.4% for hsTnT groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (overall P = 0.041, for groups 2 & 3 interaction P = 0.74). 30-day all-cause mortality, as well as 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities, occurred more frequently in those with low-level hsTnT elevation as did 1-year composite ACE. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 30-day adverse event rates were very low in those with stable low-level hsTnT elevation who ruled out for MI and were discharged from the emergency department without further inpatient testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7385443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73854432020-07-30 Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study Mahmoud, Osama Mahmaljy, Hadi Youniss, Mohamed Hernandez Campoverde, Edwin Elias, Hadi Stanton, Matthew Patel, Maulin Hashmi, Insia Young, Katelyn Kuppuraju, Rajesh Jacobs, Steven Alsaid, Amro Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: The ideal high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) cutoff for identifying those at low risk of 30 days events is debated; however, the 99th percentile overall or gender-specific upper reference limit (URL) is most commonly used. The magnitude of risk and the best management strategy for those with low-level hsTn elevation hasn’t been extensively studied. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including 4396 chest pain patients (542 with low-level hsTn elevation) who ruled out for myocardial infarction (MI), had a stable high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) levels (defined as < 5 ng/l inter-measurements increase in hsTnT levels), and were discharged from the emergency department without further ischemic testing. The aim of the study was to compare the 30-day incidence of adverse cardiac events (ACE) between patients with undetectable high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) (group 1), patients with hsTnT within the 99th percentile sex-specific URL (group 2), and patients with low-level hsTnT elevation (between the 99th percentile URL and ≤ 50 ng/l) (group 3). RESULTS: 30-day event rates were very low 0.1%, 0.6%, and 0.4% for hsTnT groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively (overall P = 0.041, for groups 2 & 3 interaction P = 0.74). 30-day all-cause mortality, as well as 1-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities, occurred more frequently in those with low-level hsTnT elevation as did 1-year composite ACE. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, 30-day adverse event rates were very low in those with stable low-level hsTnT elevation who ruled out for MI and were discharged from the emergency department without further inpatient testing. Elsevier 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7385443/ /pubmed/32743043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100586 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mahmoud, Osama
Mahmaljy, Hadi
Youniss, Mohamed
Hernandez Campoverde, Edwin
Elias, Hadi
Stanton, Matthew
Patel, Maulin
Hashmi, Insia
Young, Katelyn
Kuppuraju, Rajesh
Jacobs, Steven
Alsaid, Amro
Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study
title Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with chest pain. A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparative outcome analysis of stable mildly elevated high sensitivity troponin t in patients presenting with chest pain. a single-center retrospective cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100586
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudosama comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mahmaljyhadi comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT younissmohamed comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hernandezcampoverdeedwin comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT eliashadi comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT stantonmatthew comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT patelmaulin comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hashmiinsia comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT youngkatelyn comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kuppurajurajesh comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jacobssteven comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alsaidamro comparativeoutcomeanalysisofstablemildlyelevatedhighsensitivitytroponintinpatientspresentingwithchestpainasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy