Cargando…

Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Integration of Chinese medical drugs (CMD) and western medicine (WM) has been widely used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMD for COVID-19. METHOD: A literature search was performed in six databa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Wentai, Liu, Zhi, Li, Nan, Li, Yuyun, Yang, Fengwen, Pang, Bo, Jin, Xinyao, Zheng, Wenke, Zhang, Junhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477
_version_ 1783563798816227328
author Pang, Wentai
Liu, Zhi
Li, Nan
Li, Yuyun
Yang, Fengwen
Pang, Bo
Jin, Xinyao
Zheng, Wenke
Zhang, Junhua
author_facet Pang, Wentai
Liu, Zhi
Li, Nan
Li, Yuyun
Yang, Fengwen
Pang, Bo
Jin, Xinyao
Zheng, Wenke
Zhang, Junhua
author_sort Pang, Wentai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integration of Chinese medical drugs (CMD) and western medicine (WM) has been widely used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMD for COVID-19. METHOD: A literature search was performed in six databases from injection to June 2020. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were considered as eligible. The quality of included RCTs were assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to do meta-analysis. RESULT: Eleven studies with 1259 patients were included in this study. CMD included herbal decoction and Chinese patent medicine. The methodological quality was evaluated as generally unclear. The results of meta-analysis showed that the integration of CMD and WM had better efficacy than WM in number of patients turned to severe and critical type (RR = 0.47, 95% CI=[0.32, 0.69], P < 0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD= -7.95, 95% CI=[-14.66, -1.24], P = 0.02), defervescence time (MD= -1.20, 95% CI=[-2.03, -0.38], P = 0.004), cough resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.15, 1.64], P = 0.0004), fatigue resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.02, 1.83], P = 0.04), and tachypnea resolution rate (RR = 2.20, 95% CI=[1.11, 4.39], P = 0.02). As for safety, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: CMD may bring potential benefit to patients suffered from COVID-19. However, the quality of included trials is not good enough. High quality study with core outcome set are still required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7385501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73855012020-07-28 Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis Pang, Wentai Liu, Zhi Li, Nan Li, Yuyun Yang, Fengwen Pang, Bo Jin, Xinyao Zheng, Wenke Zhang, Junhua Integr Med Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Integration of Chinese medical drugs (CMD) and western medicine (WM) has been widely used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMD for COVID-19. METHOD: A literature search was performed in six databases from injection to June 2020. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were considered as eligible. The quality of included RCTs were assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to do meta-analysis. RESULT: Eleven studies with 1259 patients were included in this study. CMD included herbal decoction and Chinese patent medicine. The methodological quality was evaluated as generally unclear. The results of meta-analysis showed that the integration of CMD and WM had better efficacy than WM in number of patients turned to severe and critical type (RR = 0.47, 95% CI=[0.32, 0.69], P < 0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD= -7.95, 95% CI=[-14.66, -1.24], P = 0.02), defervescence time (MD= -1.20, 95% CI=[-2.03, -0.38], P = 0.004), cough resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.15, 1.64], P = 0.0004), fatigue resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.02, 1.83], P = 0.04), and tachypnea resolution rate (RR = 2.20, 95% CI=[1.11, 4.39], P = 0.02). As for safety, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: CMD may bring potential benefit to patients suffered from COVID-19. However, the quality of included trials is not good enough. High quality study with core outcome set are still required. Elsevier 2020-09 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7385501/ /pubmed/32834992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477 Text en © 2020 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Pang, Wentai
Liu, Zhi
Li, Nan
Li, Yuyun
Yang, Fengwen
Pang, Bo
Jin, Xinyao
Zheng, Wenke
Zhang, Junhua
Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477
work_keys_str_mv AT pangwentai chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuzhi chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linan chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liyuyun chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangfengwen chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pangbo chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinxinyao chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengwenke chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjunhua chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis