Cargando…
Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Integration of Chinese medical drugs (CMD) and western medicine (WM) has been widely used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMD for COVID-19. METHOD: A literature search was performed in six databa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477 |
_version_ | 1783563798816227328 |
---|---|
author | Pang, Wentai Liu, Zhi Li, Nan Li, Yuyun Yang, Fengwen Pang, Bo Jin, Xinyao Zheng, Wenke Zhang, Junhua |
author_facet | Pang, Wentai Liu, Zhi Li, Nan Li, Yuyun Yang, Fengwen Pang, Bo Jin, Xinyao Zheng, Wenke Zhang, Junhua |
author_sort | Pang, Wentai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Integration of Chinese medical drugs (CMD) and western medicine (WM) has been widely used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMD for COVID-19. METHOD: A literature search was performed in six databases from injection to June 2020. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were considered as eligible. The quality of included RCTs were assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to do meta-analysis. RESULT: Eleven studies with 1259 patients were included in this study. CMD included herbal decoction and Chinese patent medicine. The methodological quality was evaluated as generally unclear. The results of meta-analysis showed that the integration of CMD and WM had better efficacy than WM in number of patients turned to severe and critical type (RR = 0.47, 95% CI=[0.32, 0.69], P < 0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD= -7.95, 95% CI=[-14.66, -1.24], P = 0.02), defervescence time (MD= -1.20, 95% CI=[-2.03, -0.38], P = 0.004), cough resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.15, 1.64], P = 0.0004), fatigue resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.02, 1.83], P = 0.04), and tachypnea resolution rate (RR = 2.20, 95% CI=[1.11, 4.39], P = 0.02). As for safety, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: CMD may bring potential benefit to patients suffered from COVID-19. However, the quality of included trials is not good enough. High quality study with core outcome set are still required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7385501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73855012020-07-28 Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis Pang, Wentai Liu, Zhi Li, Nan Li, Yuyun Yang, Fengwen Pang, Bo Jin, Xinyao Zheng, Wenke Zhang, Junhua Integr Med Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Integration of Chinese medical drugs (CMD) and western medicine (WM) has been widely used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CMD for COVID-19. METHOD: A literature search was performed in six databases from injection to June 2020. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were considered as eligible. The quality of included RCTs were assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and Review Manager 5.3 software was used to do meta-analysis. RESULT: Eleven studies with 1259 patients were included in this study. CMD included herbal decoction and Chinese patent medicine. The methodological quality was evaluated as generally unclear. The results of meta-analysis showed that the integration of CMD and WM had better efficacy than WM in number of patients turned to severe and critical type (RR = 0.47, 95% CI=[0.32, 0.69], P < 0.0001), length of hospital stay (MD= -7.95, 95% CI=[-14.66, -1.24], P = 0.02), defervescence time (MD= -1.20, 95% CI=[-2.03, -0.38], P = 0.004), cough resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.15, 1.64], P = 0.0004), fatigue resolution rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI=[1.02, 1.83], P = 0.04), and tachypnea resolution rate (RR = 2.20, 95% CI=[1.11, 4.39], P = 0.02). As for safety, there was no significant difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: CMD may bring potential benefit to patients suffered from COVID-19. However, the quality of included trials is not good enough. High quality study with core outcome set are still required. Elsevier 2020-09 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7385501/ /pubmed/32834992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477 Text en © 2020 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pang, Wentai Liu, Zhi Li, Nan Li, Yuyun Yang, Fengwen Pang, Bo Jin, Xinyao Zheng, Wenke Zhang, Junhua Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | chinese medical drugs for coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pangwentai chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzhi chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linan chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyuyun chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangfengwen chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pangbo chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinxinyao chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhengwenke chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjunhua chinesemedicaldrugsforcoronavirusdisease2019asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |