Cargando…

Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration

BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) is still a subject of considerable interest due to the increasing frequency of half liver transplantation on the one hand, and on the other hand, new surgical approaches which allow removal of massive space-occupying hep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsomaia, Keti, Patarashvili, Leila, Karumidze, Nino, Bebiashvili, Irakli, Azmaipharashvili, Elza, Modebadze, Irina, Dzidziguri, Diana, Sareli, Marom, Gusev, Sergey, Kordzaia, Dimitri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3899
_version_ 1783563811453665280
author Tsomaia, Keti
Patarashvili, Leila
Karumidze, Nino
Bebiashvili, Irakli
Azmaipharashvili, Elza
Modebadze, Irina
Dzidziguri, Diana
Sareli, Marom
Gusev, Sergey
Kordzaia, Dimitri
author_facet Tsomaia, Keti
Patarashvili, Leila
Karumidze, Nino
Bebiashvili, Irakli
Azmaipharashvili, Elza
Modebadze, Irina
Dzidziguri, Diana
Sareli, Marom
Gusev, Sergey
Kordzaia, Dimitri
author_sort Tsomaia, Keti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) is still a subject of considerable interest due to the increasing frequency of half liver transplantation on the one hand, and on the other hand, new surgical approaches which allow removal of massive space-occupying hepatic tumors, which earlier was considered as inoperable. Interestingly, the mechanisms of liver regeneration are extensively studied after PH but less attention is paid to the architectonics of the regenerated organ. Because of this, the question “How does the structure of regenerated liver differ from normal, regular liver?” has not been fully answered yet. Furthermore, almost without any attention is left the liver's structural transformation after repeated hepatectomy (of the re-regenereted liver). AIM: To compare the architectonics of the lobules and circulatory bed of normal, re-generated and re-regenerated livers. METHODS: The livers of 40 adult, male, albino Wistar rats were studied. 14 rats were subjected to PH - the 1(st) study group (SG1); 10 rats underwent repeated PH – the 2(nd) study group (SG2); 16 rats were subjected to sham operation - control group (CG); The livers were studied after 9 months from PH, and after 6 months from repeated PH. Cytological (Schiff reaction for the determination of DNA concen-tration), histological (H&E, Masson trichrome, CK8 Immunohistochemical marker, transparent slides after Indian Ink injection, ), morphometrical (hepatocytes areas, perimeters and ploidy) and Electron Microscopical (Scanning Electron Microscopy of corrosion casts) methods were used. RESULTS: In the SG1 and SG2, the area of hepatocytes and their perimeter are increased compared to the CG (P < 0.05). However, the areas and perimeters of the hepatocytes of the SG(1) and SG(2) groups reveal a lesser difference. In regenerated (SG(1)) and re-regenerated (SG(2)) livers, the hepatocytes form the remodeled lobules, which size (300-1200 µm) exceeds the sizes of the lobules from CG (300-600 µm). The remodeled lobules (especially the “mega-lobules” with the sizes 1000-1200 µm) contain the transformed meshworks of the sinusoids, the part of which is dilated asymmetrically. This meshwork might have originated from the several portal venules (interlobular and/or inlet). The boundaries between the adjacent lobules (including mega-lobules) are widened and filled by connective tissue fibers, which gives the liver parenchyma a nodular look. In SG(2) the unevenness of sinusoid diameters, as well as the boundaries between the lobules (including the mega-lobules) are more vividly expressed in comparison with SG(1). The liver tissue of both SG(1) and SG(2) is featured by the slightly expressed ductular reaction. CONCLUSION: Regenerated and re-regenerated livers in comparison with normal liver contain hypertrophied hepatocytes with increased ploidy which together with transformed sinusoidal and biliary meshworks form the remodeled lobulli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7385567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73855672020-08-07 Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration Tsomaia, Keti Patarashvili, Leila Karumidze, Nino Bebiashvili, Irakli Azmaipharashvili, Elza Modebadze, Irina Dzidziguri, Diana Sareli, Marom Gusev, Sergey Kordzaia, Dimitri World J Gastroenterol Basic Study BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) is still a subject of considerable interest due to the increasing frequency of half liver transplantation on the one hand, and on the other hand, new surgical approaches which allow removal of massive space-occupying hepatic tumors, which earlier was considered as inoperable. Interestingly, the mechanisms of liver regeneration are extensively studied after PH but less attention is paid to the architectonics of the regenerated organ. Because of this, the question “How does the structure of regenerated liver differ from normal, regular liver?” has not been fully answered yet. Furthermore, almost without any attention is left the liver's structural transformation after repeated hepatectomy (of the re-regenereted liver). AIM: To compare the architectonics of the lobules and circulatory bed of normal, re-generated and re-regenerated livers. METHODS: The livers of 40 adult, male, albino Wistar rats were studied. 14 rats were subjected to PH - the 1(st) study group (SG1); 10 rats underwent repeated PH – the 2(nd) study group (SG2); 16 rats were subjected to sham operation - control group (CG); The livers were studied after 9 months from PH, and after 6 months from repeated PH. Cytological (Schiff reaction for the determination of DNA concen-tration), histological (H&E, Masson trichrome, CK8 Immunohistochemical marker, transparent slides after Indian Ink injection, ), morphometrical (hepatocytes areas, perimeters and ploidy) and Electron Microscopical (Scanning Electron Microscopy of corrosion casts) methods were used. RESULTS: In the SG1 and SG2, the area of hepatocytes and their perimeter are increased compared to the CG (P < 0.05). However, the areas and perimeters of the hepatocytes of the SG(1) and SG(2) groups reveal a lesser difference. In regenerated (SG(1)) and re-regenerated (SG(2)) livers, the hepatocytes form the remodeled lobules, which size (300-1200 µm) exceeds the sizes of the lobules from CG (300-600 µm). The remodeled lobules (especially the “mega-lobules” with the sizes 1000-1200 µm) contain the transformed meshworks of the sinusoids, the part of which is dilated asymmetrically. This meshwork might have originated from the several portal venules (interlobular and/or inlet). The boundaries between the adjacent lobules (including mega-lobules) are widened and filled by connective tissue fibers, which gives the liver parenchyma a nodular look. In SG(2) the unevenness of sinusoid diameters, as well as the boundaries between the lobules (including the mega-lobules) are more vividly expressed in comparison with SG(1). The liver tissue of both SG(1) and SG(2) is featured by the slightly expressed ductular reaction. CONCLUSION: Regenerated and re-regenerated livers in comparison with normal liver contain hypertrophied hepatocytes with increased ploidy which together with transformed sinusoidal and biliary meshworks form the remodeled lobulli. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-07-21 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7385567/ /pubmed/32774065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3899 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Basic Study
Tsomaia, Keti
Patarashvili, Leila
Karumidze, Nino
Bebiashvili, Irakli
Azmaipharashvili, Elza
Modebadze, Irina
Dzidziguri, Diana
Sareli, Marom
Gusev, Sergey
Kordzaia, Dimitri
Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
title Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
title_full Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
title_fullStr Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
title_short Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
title_sort liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: a renewed view on liver regeneration
topic Basic Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3899
work_keys_str_mv AT tsomaiaketi liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT patarashvilileila liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT karumidzenino liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT bebiashviliirakli liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT azmaipharashvilielza liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT modebadzeirina liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT dzidziguridiana liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT sarelimarom liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT gusevsergey liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration
AT kordzaiadimitri liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration