Cargando…
Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration
BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) is still a subject of considerable interest due to the increasing frequency of half liver transplantation on the one hand, and on the other hand, new surgical approaches which allow removal of massive space-occupying hep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3899 |
_version_ | 1783563811453665280 |
---|---|
author | Tsomaia, Keti Patarashvili, Leila Karumidze, Nino Bebiashvili, Irakli Azmaipharashvili, Elza Modebadze, Irina Dzidziguri, Diana Sareli, Marom Gusev, Sergey Kordzaia, Dimitri |
author_facet | Tsomaia, Keti Patarashvili, Leila Karumidze, Nino Bebiashvili, Irakli Azmaipharashvili, Elza Modebadze, Irina Dzidziguri, Diana Sareli, Marom Gusev, Sergey Kordzaia, Dimitri |
author_sort | Tsomaia, Keti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) is still a subject of considerable interest due to the increasing frequency of half liver transplantation on the one hand, and on the other hand, new surgical approaches which allow removal of massive space-occupying hepatic tumors, which earlier was considered as inoperable. Interestingly, the mechanisms of liver regeneration are extensively studied after PH but less attention is paid to the architectonics of the regenerated organ. Because of this, the question “How does the structure of regenerated liver differ from normal, regular liver?” has not been fully answered yet. Furthermore, almost without any attention is left the liver's structural transformation after repeated hepatectomy (of the re-regenereted liver). AIM: To compare the architectonics of the lobules and circulatory bed of normal, re-generated and re-regenerated livers. METHODS: The livers of 40 adult, male, albino Wistar rats were studied. 14 rats were subjected to PH - the 1(st) study group (SG1); 10 rats underwent repeated PH – the 2(nd) study group (SG2); 16 rats were subjected to sham operation - control group (CG); The livers were studied after 9 months from PH, and after 6 months from repeated PH. Cytological (Schiff reaction for the determination of DNA concen-tration), histological (H&E, Masson trichrome, CK8 Immunohistochemical marker, transparent slides after Indian Ink injection, ), morphometrical (hepatocytes areas, perimeters and ploidy) and Electron Microscopical (Scanning Electron Microscopy of corrosion casts) methods were used. RESULTS: In the SG1 and SG2, the area of hepatocytes and their perimeter are increased compared to the CG (P < 0.05). However, the areas and perimeters of the hepatocytes of the SG(1) and SG(2) groups reveal a lesser difference. In regenerated (SG(1)) and re-regenerated (SG(2)) livers, the hepatocytes form the remodeled lobules, which size (300-1200 µm) exceeds the sizes of the lobules from CG (300-600 µm). The remodeled lobules (especially the “mega-lobules” with the sizes 1000-1200 µm) contain the transformed meshworks of the sinusoids, the part of which is dilated asymmetrically. This meshwork might have originated from the several portal venules (interlobular and/or inlet). The boundaries between the adjacent lobules (including mega-lobules) are widened and filled by connective tissue fibers, which gives the liver parenchyma a nodular look. In SG(2) the unevenness of sinusoid diameters, as well as the boundaries between the lobules (including the mega-lobules) are more vividly expressed in comparison with SG(1). The liver tissue of both SG(1) and SG(2) is featured by the slightly expressed ductular reaction. CONCLUSION: Regenerated and re-regenerated livers in comparison with normal liver contain hypertrophied hepatocytes with increased ploidy which together with transformed sinusoidal and biliary meshworks form the remodeled lobulli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7385567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73855672020-08-07 Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration Tsomaia, Keti Patarashvili, Leila Karumidze, Nino Bebiashvili, Irakli Azmaipharashvili, Elza Modebadze, Irina Dzidziguri, Diana Sareli, Marom Gusev, Sergey Kordzaia, Dimitri World J Gastroenterol Basic Study BACKGROUND: The phenomenon of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) is still a subject of considerable interest due to the increasing frequency of half liver transplantation on the one hand, and on the other hand, new surgical approaches which allow removal of massive space-occupying hepatic tumors, which earlier was considered as inoperable. Interestingly, the mechanisms of liver regeneration are extensively studied after PH but less attention is paid to the architectonics of the regenerated organ. Because of this, the question “How does the structure of regenerated liver differ from normal, regular liver?” has not been fully answered yet. Furthermore, almost without any attention is left the liver's structural transformation after repeated hepatectomy (of the re-regenereted liver). AIM: To compare the architectonics of the lobules and circulatory bed of normal, re-generated and re-regenerated livers. METHODS: The livers of 40 adult, male, albino Wistar rats were studied. 14 rats were subjected to PH - the 1(st) study group (SG1); 10 rats underwent repeated PH – the 2(nd) study group (SG2); 16 rats were subjected to sham operation - control group (CG); The livers were studied after 9 months from PH, and after 6 months from repeated PH. Cytological (Schiff reaction for the determination of DNA concen-tration), histological (H&E, Masson trichrome, CK8 Immunohistochemical marker, transparent slides after Indian Ink injection, ), morphometrical (hepatocytes areas, perimeters and ploidy) and Electron Microscopical (Scanning Electron Microscopy of corrosion casts) methods were used. RESULTS: In the SG1 and SG2, the area of hepatocytes and their perimeter are increased compared to the CG (P < 0.05). However, the areas and perimeters of the hepatocytes of the SG(1) and SG(2) groups reveal a lesser difference. In regenerated (SG(1)) and re-regenerated (SG(2)) livers, the hepatocytes form the remodeled lobules, which size (300-1200 µm) exceeds the sizes of the lobules from CG (300-600 µm). The remodeled lobules (especially the “mega-lobules” with the sizes 1000-1200 µm) contain the transformed meshworks of the sinusoids, the part of which is dilated asymmetrically. This meshwork might have originated from the several portal venules (interlobular and/or inlet). The boundaries between the adjacent lobules (including mega-lobules) are widened and filled by connective tissue fibers, which gives the liver parenchyma a nodular look. In SG(2) the unevenness of sinusoid diameters, as well as the boundaries between the lobules (including the mega-lobules) are more vividly expressed in comparison with SG(1). The liver tissue of both SG(1) and SG(2) is featured by the slightly expressed ductular reaction. CONCLUSION: Regenerated and re-regenerated livers in comparison with normal liver contain hypertrophied hepatocytes with increased ploidy which together with transformed sinusoidal and biliary meshworks form the remodeled lobulli. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-07-21 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7385567/ /pubmed/32774065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3899 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Basic Study Tsomaia, Keti Patarashvili, Leila Karumidze, Nino Bebiashvili, Irakli Azmaipharashvili, Elza Modebadze, Irina Dzidziguri, Diana Sareli, Marom Gusev, Sergey Kordzaia, Dimitri Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration |
title | Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration |
title_full | Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration |
title_fullStr | Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration |
title_short | Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration |
title_sort | liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: a renewed view on liver regeneration |
topic | Basic Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsomaiaketi liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT patarashvilileila liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT karumidzenino liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT bebiashviliirakli liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT azmaipharashvilielza liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT modebadzeirina liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT dzidziguridiana liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT sarelimarom liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT gusevsergey liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration AT kordzaiadimitri liverstructuraltransformationafterpartialhepatectomyandrepeatedpartialhepatectomyinratsarenewedviewonliverregeneration |