Cargando…

Restenosis after recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: Management and long-term results of 60 patients

BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome is defined as hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction. For Asian Budd-Chiari syndrome patients, the major treatment modality is recanalization (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stent implantation). The cumulative 1-, 5-, and 10-year primary pate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wei, Tian, Yu-Long, Wang, Qiao-Zheng, Chen, Xiao-Wei, Li, Qi-Yang, Han, Jin-Hang, Chen, Xu-Dong, Xu, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32775375
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i14.2930
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome is defined as hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction. For Asian Budd-Chiari syndrome patients, the major treatment modality is recanalization (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stent implantation). The cumulative 1-, 5-, and 10-year primary patency rates and survival rates are reported to be excellent or satisfactory, but the long-term outcome of patients with restenosis (the most common complication after recanalization) is unknown. AIM: To explore the treatment strategy for restenosis in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome after interventional therapy and to evaluate the long-term follow-up results. METHODS: The clinical data and follow-up results of 60 patients with restenosis after interventional therapy from November 1983 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty patients with restenosis were retrospectively divided into a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) group (40 patients) and a PTA + stent group (20 patients) according to the primary recanalization method. For the patients with restenosis in the PTA group, 13 refused treatment, and 27 received further treatment; among these patients, five had a second restenosis, two had a third restenosis, and one had a fourth restenosis. For the patients with restenosis in the PTA + stent group, nine refused treatment, ten received PTA alone, and the other received PTA + stent implantation. Among the patients who received further treatment, five had a second restenosis, three had a third restenosis, and one had a fourth restenosis. The 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 25-year cumulative survival rates of the 38 patients who received further treatment after restenosis were 100%, 78.3%, 78.3%, 70.5%, and 70.5%, respectively; however, for the 22 patients who refused treatment, the survival rates were 72.7%, 45.9%, 30.6%, 10.2%, and unavailable, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after interventional therapy is very important. Active treatment for patients with restenosis can improve prognosis, and minimally invasive treatment strategies for restenosis allows to obtain satisfactory results.