Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 with regard to public health and clinical impacts by incorporating asymptomatic and presymptomatic infection and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Yawen, Cai, Dan, Chen, Daqin, Jiang, Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32694221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002690
_version_ 1783563842642509824
author Jiang, Yawen
Cai, Dan
Chen, Daqin
Jiang, Shan
author_facet Jiang, Yawen
Cai, Dan
Chen, Daqin
Jiang, Shan
author_sort Jiang, Yawen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 with regard to public health and clinical impacts by incorporating asymptomatic and presymptomatic infection and to compare the medical costs associated with the two strategies. METHODS: A model that consisted of six compartments was built. The compartments were the susceptible (S), the asymptomatic infective (A), the presymptomatic infective (L), the symptomatic infective (I), the recovered (R), and the deceased (D). The A, L and I classes were infective states. To construct the model, several parameters were set as fixed using existing evidence and the rest of the parameters were estimated by fitting the model to a smoothed curve of the cumulative confirmed cases in Wuhan from 24 January 2020 to 6 March 2020. Input data about the cost-effectiveness analysis were retrieved from the literature. RESULTS: Conducting RT-PCR tests three times for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 reduced the estimated total number of symptomatic cases to 45‌ 013 from 51 144 in the two-test strategy over 43 days. The former strategy also led to 850.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of health gain and a net healthcare expenditure saving of CN¥49.1 million. About 100.7 QALYs of the health gain were attributable to quality-adjusted life day difference between the strategies during the analytic period and 749.4 QALYs were attributable to years of life saved. CONCLUSIONS: More accurate strategies and methods of testing for the control of COVID-19 may reduce both the number of infections and the total medical costs. Increasing the number of tests should be considered in regions with relatively severe epidemics when existing tests have moderate sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7385750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73857502020-07-29 The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China Jiang, Yawen Cai, Dan Chen, Daqin Jiang, Shan BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 with regard to public health and clinical impacts by incorporating asymptomatic and presymptomatic infection and to compare the medical costs associated with the two strategies. METHODS: A model that consisted of six compartments was built. The compartments were the susceptible (S), the asymptomatic infective (A), the presymptomatic infective (L), the symptomatic infective (I), the recovered (R), and the deceased (D). The A, L and I classes were infective states. To construct the model, several parameters were set as fixed using existing evidence and the rest of the parameters were estimated by fitting the model to a smoothed curve of the cumulative confirmed cases in Wuhan from 24 January 2020 to 6 March 2020. Input data about the cost-effectiveness analysis were retrieved from the literature. RESULTS: Conducting RT-PCR tests three times for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 reduced the estimated total number of symptomatic cases to 45‌ 013 from 51 144 in the two-test strategy over 43 days. The former strategy also led to 850.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of health gain and a net healthcare expenditure saving of CN¥49.1 million. About 100.7 QALYs of the health gain were attributable to quality-adjusted life day difference between the strategies during the analytic period and 749.4 QALYs were attributable to years of life saved. CONCLUSIONS: More accurate strategies and methods of testing for the control of COVID-19 may reduce both the number of infections and the total medical costs. Increasing the number of tests should be considered in regions with relatively severe epidemics when existing tests have moderate sensitivity. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7385750/ /pubmed/32694221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002690 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .
spellingShingle Original Research
Jiang, Yawen
Cai, Dan
Chen, Daqin
Jiang, Shan
The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
title The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
title_full The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
title_short The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
title_sort cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with covid-19: evidence from the epidemic in wuhan, china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32694221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002690
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangyawen thecosteffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT caidan thecosteffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT chendaqin thecosteffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT jiangshan thecosteffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT jiangyawen costeffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT caidan costeffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT chendaqin costeffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina
AT jiangshan costeffectivenessofconductingthreeversustworeversetranscriptionpolymerasechainreactiontestsfordiagnosinganddischargingpeoplewithcovid19evidencefromtheepidemicinwuhanchina