Cargando…
Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C(H)) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C(P)), and the corneal center (C(C)) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9 |
_version_ | 1783563856324329472 |
---|---|
author | He, Xiaojian Niu, Lingling Miao, Huamao Zhao, Feng Zhou, Xingtao |
author_facet | He, Xiaojian Niu, Lingling Miao, Huamao Zhao, Feng Zhou, Xingtao |
author_sort | He, Xiaojian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C(H)) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C(P)), and the corneal center (C(C)) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients with moderate to high myopia were evaluated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was − 12.58 ± 4.13D. A routine postoperative follow-up was performed within 1 ~ 12 months. Positions of the C(H) of EVO-ICLs, the C(P) and the C(C) were recorded using a slit lamp anterior segment photography system, and their relative distances were calculated with the Visio image analysis software. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed safely, and no complications were observed in follow-ups 4.3 ± 4.82 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, the safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.23 ± 0.48, and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.08 ± 0.31. The C(H) in 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior to the C(C), with 47.19% (42/89) on the temporal side and 48.31% (43/89) on the nasal side. The C(H) in 84 eyes (94.38%) was located on the temporal side of the C(P), with 56.18% (50/89) superior and 38.2% (34/89) inferior to the C(P). The C(P) of 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior on the nasal side of the C(C). On the defined x-axis, the average distance from the C(H) to C(C) was significantly shorter than the average distance from the C(P) to C(C) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An imperfect match between the central hole of EVO-ICLs and the pupil center does not necessarily indicate ICL dislocation. Compared to the pupil center, the position of the central hole of EVO-ICL is closer to the corneal center. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7385873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73858732020-07-30 Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia He, Xiaojian Niu, Lingling Miao, Huamao Zhao, Feng Zhou, Xingtao BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C(H)) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C(P)), and the corneal center (C(C)) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients with moderate to high myopia were evaluated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was − 12.58 ± 4.13D. A routine postoperative follow-up was performed within 1 ~ 12 months. Positions of the C(H) of EVO-ICLs, the C(P) and the C(C) were recorded using a slit lamp anterior segment photography system, and their relative distances were calculated with the Visio image analysis software. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed safely, and no complications were observed in follow-ups 4.3 ± 4.82 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, the safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.23 ± 0.48, and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.08 ± 0.31. The C(H) in 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior to the C(C), with 47.19% (42/89) on the temporal side and 48.31% (43/89) on the nasal side. The C(H) in 84 eyes (94.38%) was located on the temporal side of the C(P), with 56.18% (50/89) superior and 38.2% (34/89) inferior to the C(P). The C(P) of 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior on the nasal side of the C(C). On the defined x-axis, the average distance from the C(H) to C(C) was significantly shorter than the average distance from the C(P) to C(C) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An imperfect match between the central hole of EVO-ICLs and the pupil center does not necessarily indicate ICL dislocation. Compared to the pupil center, the position of the central hole of EVO-ICL is closer to the corneal center. BioMed Central 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7385873/ /pubmed/32723334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article He, Xiaojian Niu, Lingling Miao, Huamao Zhao, Feng Zhou, Xingtao Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia |
title | Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia |
title_full | Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia |
title_fullStr | Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia |
title_short | Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia |
title_sort | relative position of the central hole after evo-icl implantation for moderate to high myopia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hexiaojian relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia AT niulingling relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia AT miaohuamao relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia AT zhaofeng relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia AT zhouxingtao relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia |