Cargando…

Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C(H)) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C(P)), and the corneal center (C(C)) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xiaojian, Niu, Lingling, Miao, Huamao, Zhao, Feng, Zhou, Xingtao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9
_version_ 1783563856324329472
author He, Xiaojian
Niu, Lingling
Miao, Huamao
Zhao, Feng
Zhou, Xingtao
author_facet He, Xiaojian
Niu, Lingling
Miao, Huamao
Zhao, Feng
Zhou, Xingtao
author_sort He, Xiaojian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C(H)) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C(P)), and the corneal center (C(C)) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients with moderate to high myopia were evaluated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was − 12.58 ± 4.13D. A routine postoperative follow-up was performed within 1 ~ 12 months. Positions of the C(H) of EVO-ICLs, the C(P) and the C(C) were recorded using a slit lamp anterior segment photography system, and their relative distances were calculated with the Visio image analysis software. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed safely, and no complications were observed in follow-ups 4.3 ± 4.82 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, the safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.23 ± 0.48, and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.08 ± 0.31. The C(H) in 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior to the C(C), with 47.19% (42/89) on the temporal side and 48.31% (43/89) on the nasal side. The C(H) in 84 eyes (94.38%) was located on the temporal side of the C(P), with 56.18% (50/89) superior and 38.2% (34/89) inferior to the C(P). The C(P) of 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior on the nasal side of the C(C). On the defined x-axis, the average distance from the C(H) to C(C) was significantly shorter than the average distance from the C(P) to C(C) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An imperfect match between the central hole of EVO-ICLs and the pupil center does not necessarily indicate ICL dislocation. Compared to the pupil center, the position of the central hole of EVO-ICL is closer to the corneal center.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7385873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73858732020-07-30 Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia He, Xiaojian Niu, Lingling Miao, Huamao Zhao, Feng Zhou, Xingtao BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the relative position of the central hole (C(H)) of EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (EVO-ICL), the pupil center (C(P)), and the corneal center (C(C)) after implantation of EVO-ICLs for moderate to high myopia. METHODS: Eighty-nine eyes of forty-seven patients with moderate to high myopia were evaluated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was − 12.58 ± 4.13D. A routine postoperative follow-up was performed within 1 ~ 12 months. Positions of the C(H) of EVO-ICLs, the C(P) and the C(C) were recorded using a slit lamp anterior segment photography system, and their relative distances were calculated with the Visio image analysis software. RESULTS: All surgeries were performed safely, and no complications were observed in follow-ups 4.3 ± 4.82 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, the safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.23 ± 0.48, and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.08 ± 0.31. The C(H) in 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior to the C(C), with 47.19% (42/89) on the temporal side and 48.31% (43/89) on the nasal side. The C(H) in 84 eyes (94.38%) was located on the temporal side of the C(P), with 56.18% (50/89) superior and 38.2% (34/89) inferior to the C(P). The C(P) of 85 eyes (95.51%) was superior on the nasal side of the C(C). On the defined x-axis, the average distance from the C(H) to C(C) was significantly shorter than the average distance from the C(P) to C(C) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An imperfect match between the central hole of EVO-ICLs and the pupil center does not necessarily indicate ICL dislocation. Compared to the pupil center, the position of the central hole of EVO-ICL is closer to the corneal center. BioMed Central 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7385873/ /pubmed/32723334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Xiaojian
Niu, Lingling
Miao, Huamao
Zhao, Feng
Zhou, Xingtao
Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
title Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
title_full Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
title_fullStr Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
title_full_unstemmed Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
title_short Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia
title_sort relative position of the central hole after evo-icl implantation for moderate to high myopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7385873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01569-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hexiaojian relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia
AT niulingling relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia
AT miaohuamao relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia
AT zhaofeng relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia
AT zhouxingtao relativepositionofthecentralholeafterevoiclimplantationformoderatetohighmyopia