Cargando…

Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks

The study analysed the set-to-set variation in performance using match statistics of 146 completed main-draw matches in Australian Open and US Open 2016-2017 men’s singles. Comparisons of technical-tactical and physical performance variables were done between different sets; and the within-match coe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Yixiong, Liu, Haoyang, Gómez, Miguel-Ángel, Liu, Hongyou, Gonçalves, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0140
_version_ 1783563898110083072
author Cui, Yixiong
Liu, Haoyang
Gómez, Miguel-Ángel
Liu, Hongyou
Gonçalves, Bruno
author_facet Cui, Yixiong
Liu, Haoyang
Gómez, Miguel-Ángel
Liu, Hongyou
Gonçalves, Bruno
author_sort Cui, Yixiong
collection PubMed
description The study analysed the set-to-set variation in performance using match statistics of 146 completed main-draw matches in Australian Open and US Open 2016-2017 men’s singles. Comparisons of technical-tactical and physical performance variables were done between different sets; and the within-match coefficients of variation (CV) of these variables were contrasted between match winning and losing players. All comparisons were realized via standardized (Cohen’s d) mean differences and uncertainty in the true differences was assessed using non-clinical magnitude-based inferences. Results showed that there was possibly to very likely decreases in the serve, net and running related variables (mean difference, ±90%CL: -0.16, ±0.14 to -0.45, ±0.24, small) and an increase in the return and winner related variables (0.17, ±0.24 to 0.24, ±0.14, small) in the last sets when compared to the initial sets, indicating the influence of match fatigue and the player’s choice of match tactics and pacing strategy. Besides, winning players were revealed to have lower CV values in most of performance variables (-0.16, ±0.24 to -0.82, ±0.23, small to moderate) except for the second serve, winner, and physical performance variables (0.25, ±0.26 to 1.6, ±0.25, small to large), indicating that they would sacrifice the consistency to gain more aggressiveness and to dominate the match.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7386150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73861502020-08-07 Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks Cui, Yixiong Liu, Haoyang Gómez, Miguel-Ángel Liu, Hongyou Gonçalves, Bruno J Hum Kinet Section III – Sports Training The study analysed the set-to-set variation in performance using match statistics of 146 completed main-draw matches in Australian Open and US Open 2016-2017 men’s singles. Comparisons of technical-tactical and physical performance variables were done between different sets; and the within-match coefficients of variation (CV) of these variables were contrasted between match winning and losing players. All comparisons were realized via standardized (Cohen’s d) mean differences and uncertainty in the true differences was assessed using non-clinical magnitude-based inferences. Results showed that there was possibly to very likely decreases in the serve, net and running related variables (mean difference, ±90%CL: -0.16, ±0.14 to -0.45, ±0.24, small) and an increase in the return and winner related variables (0.17, ±0.24 to 0.24, ±0.14, small) in the last sets when compared to the initial sets, indicating the influence of match fatigue and the player’s choice of match tactics and pacing strategy. Besides, winning players were revealed to have lower CV values in most of performance variables (-0.16, ±0.24 to -0.82, ±0.23, small to moderate) except for the second serve, winner, and physical performance variables (0.25, ±0.26 to 1.6, ±0.25, small to large), indicating that they would sacrifice the consistency to gain more aggressiveness and to dominate the match. Sciendo 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7386150/ /pubmed/32774547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0140 Text en © 2020 Yixiong Cui, Haoyang Liu, Miguel-Ángel Gómez, Hongyou Liu, Bruno Gonçalves, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section III – Sports Training
Cui, Yixiong
Liu, Haoyang
Gómez, Miguel-Ángel
Liu, Hongyou
Gonçalves, Bruno
Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks
title Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks
title_full Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks
title_fullStr Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks
title_full_unstemmed Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks
title_short Set-to-set Performance Variation in Tennis Grand Slams: Play with Consistency and Risks
title_sort set-to-set performance variation in tennis grand slams: play with consistency and risks
topic Section III – Sports Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774547
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0140
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiyixiong settosetperformancevariationintennisgrandslamsplaywithconsistencyandrisks
AT liuhaoyang settosetperformancevariationintennisgrandslamsplaywithconsistencyandrisks
AT gomezmiguelangel settosetperformancevariationintennisgrandslamsplaywithconsistencyandrisks
AT liuhongyou settosetperformancevariationintennisgrandslamsplaywithconsistencyandrisks
AT goncalvesbruno settosetperformancevariationintennisgrandslamsplaywithconsistencyandrisks