Cargando…

Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop machine and deep learning‐based models to predict output and MU based on measured patient quality assurance (QA) data in uniform scanning proton therapy (USPT). METHODS: This study involves 4,231 patient QA measurements conducted over the last 6 years....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grewal, Hardev S., Chacko, Michael S., Ahmad, Salahuddin, Jin, Hosang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12899
_version_ 1783563904755957760
author Grewal, Hardev S.
Chacko, Michael S.
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Jin, Hosang
author_facet Grewal, Hardev S.
Chacko, Michael S.
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Jin, Hosang
author_sort Grewal, Hardev S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop machine and deep learning‐based models to predict output and MU based on measured patient quality assurance (QA) data in uniform scanning proton therapy (USPT). METHODS: This study involves 4,231 patient QA measurements conducted over the last 6 years. In the current approach, output and MU are predicted by an empirical model (EM) based on patient treatment plan parameters. In this study, two MATLAB‐based machine and deep learning algorithms — Gaussian process regression (GPR) and shallow neural network (SNN) — were developed. The four parameters from patient QA (range, modulation, field size, and measured output factor) were used to train these algorithms. The data were randomized with a training set containing 90% and a testing set containing remaining 10% of the data. The model performance during training was accessed using root mean square error (RMSE) and R‐squared values. The trained model was used to predict output based on the three input parameters: range, modulation, and field size. The percent difference was calculated between the predicted and measured output factors. The number of data sets required to make prediction accuracy of GPR and SNN models' invariable was also evaluated. RESULTS: The prediction accuracy of machine and deep learning algorithms is higher than the EM. The output predictions with [GPR, SNN, and EM] within ± 2% and ± 3% difference were [97.16%, 97.64%, and 92.95%] and [99.76%, 99.29%, and 97.18%], respectively. The GPR model outperformed the SNN with a smaller number of training data sets. CONCLUSION: The GPR and SNN models outperformed the EM in terms of prediction accuracy. Machine and deep learning algorithms predicted the output factor and MU for USPT with higher predictive accuracy than EM. In our clinic, these models have been adopted as a secondary check of MU or output factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7386178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73861782020-07-30 Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy Grewal, Hardev S. Chacko, Michael S. Ahmad, Salahuddin Jin, Hosang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to develop machine and deep learning‐based models to predict output and MU based on measured patient quality assurance (QA) data in uniform scanning proton therapy (USPT). METHODS: This study involves 4,231 patient QA measurements conducted over the last 6 years. In the current approach, output and MU are predicted by an empirical model (EM) based on patient treatment plan parameters. In this study, two MATLAB‐based machine and deep learning algorithms — Gaussian process regression (GPR) and shallow neural network (SNN) — were developed. The four parameters from patient QA (range, modulation, field size, and measured output factor) were used to train these algorithms. The data were randomized with a training set containing 90% and a testing set containing remaining 10% of the data. The model performance during training was accessed using root mean square error (RMSE) and R‐squared values. The trained model was used to predict output based on the three input parameters: range, modulation, and field size. The percent difference was calculated between the predicted and measured output factors. The number of data sets required to make prediction accuracy of GPR and SNN models' invariable was also evaluated. RESULTS: The prediction accuracy of machine and deep learning algorithms is higher than the EM. The output predictions with [GPR, SNN, and EM] within ± 2% and ± 3% difference were [97.16%, 97.64%, and 92.95%] and [99.76%, 99.29%, and 97.18%], respectively. The GPR model outperformed the SNN with a smaller number of training data sets. CONCLUSION: The GPR and SNN models outperformed the EM in terms of prediction accuracy. Machine and deep learning algorithms predicted the output factor and MU for USPT with higher predictive accuracy than EM. In our clinic, these models have been adopted as a secondary check of MU or output factors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7386178/ /pubmed/32419245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12899 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Grewal, Hardev S.
Chacko, Michael S.
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Jin, Hosang
Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
title Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
title_full Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
title_fullStr Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
title_short Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
title_sort prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12899
work_keys_str_mv AT grewalhardevs predictionoftheoutputfactorusingmachineanddeeplearningapproachinuniformscanningprotontherapy
AT chackomichaels predictionoftheoutputfactorusingmachineanddeeplearningapproachinuniformscanningprotontherapy
AT ahmadsalahuddin predictionoftheoutputfactorusingmachineanddeeplearningapproachinuniformscanningprotontherapy
AT jinhosang predictionoftheoutputfactorusingmachineanddeeplearningapproachinuniformscanningprotontherapy