Cargando…
Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep
Eleven St. Croix ewes (46.9 ± 1.59 kg BW and 3.6 ± 0.67 yr age) were used in a crossover design to evaluate effects of restricted drinking water availability on intake of a 50% concentrate diet, digestion, and energy utilization. After 2 wk to determine ad libitum water consumption, there were two 4...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2020.100132 |
_version_ | 1783564005969756160 |
---|---|
author | Hussein, A.H. Puchala, R. Gipson, T.A. Tadesse, D. Wilson, B.K. Goetsch, A.L. |
author_facet | Hussein, A.H. Puchala, R. Gipson, T.A. Tadesse, D. Wilson, B.K. Goetsch, A.L. |
author_sort | Hussein, A.H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Eleven St. Croix ewes (46.9 ± 1.59 kg BW and 3.6 ± 0.67 yr age) were used in a crossover design to evaluate effects of restricted drinking water availability on intake of a 50% concentrate diet, digestion, and energy utilization. After 2 wk to determine ad libitum water consumption, there were two 4-wk periods, with measures in metabolism cages during wk 4. One treatment was water offered at the ad libitum level (CONT) and the other entailed a 25% reduction in wk 1 and 50% thereafter (REST). Although, some water was refused in wk 4, with intake of 2556 and 1707 g/day for CONT and REST, respectively (SEM=170.9). Digestibility of gross energy was greater (P = 0.034) for REST than for CONT (66.5 vs. 62.4%; SEM=1.16); however, because of a numerical difference (P = 0.448) in energy intake (15.79 and 14.66 MJ/day for CONT and REST, respectively; SEM=1.426 MJ/day), digested energy intake was similar between treatments (P = 0.870). Urinary energy was greater (P = 0.023) for CONT vs. REST (0.62 and 0.52 MJ/day; SEM=0.038) and methane energy did not differ (P = 0.213) between treatments (0.76 and 0.89 MJ/day; SEM=0.084), resulting in similar (P = 0.665) ME intake (8.50 and 8.01 MJ/day for CONT and REST, respectively; SEM=0.855). Both heat (8.60 and 8.33 MJ/day; SEM=0.437) and recovered energy (-0.10 and -0.30 MJ/day for CONT and REST, respectively; SEM=0.623) were similar between treatments (P ≥ 0.880). In conclusion, increased digestibility appears an important adaptive response to limited availability of drinking water. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7386745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73867452020-07-29 Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep Hussein, A.H. Puchala, R. Gipson, T.A. Tadesse, D. Wilson, B.K. Goetsch, A.L. Vet Anim Sci Article Eleven St. Croix ewes (46.9 ± 1.59 kg BW and 3.6 ± 0.67 yr age) were used in a crossover design to evaluate effects of restricted drinking water availability on intake of a 50% concentrate diet, digestion, and energy utilization. After 2 wk to determine ad libitum water consumption, there were two 4-wk periods, with measures in metabolism cages during wk 4. One treatment was water offered at the ad libitum level (CONT) and the other entailed a 25% reduction in wk 1 and 50% thereafter (REST). Although, some water was refused in wk 4, with intake of 2556 and 1707 g/day for CONT and REST, respectively (SEM=170.9). Digestibility of gross energy was greater (P = 0.034) for REST than for CONT (66.5 vs. 62.4%; SEM=1.16); however, because of a numerical difference (P = 0.448) in energy intake (15.79 and 14.66 MJ/day for CONT and REST, respectively; SEM=1.426 MJ/day), digested energy intake was similar between treatments (P = 0.870). Urinary energy was greater (P = 0.023) for CONT vs. REST (0.62 and 0.52 MJ/day; SEM=0.038) and methane energy did not differ (P = 0.213) between treatments (0.76 and 0.89 MJ/day; SEM=0.084), resulting in similar (P = 0.665) ME intake (8.50 and 8.01 MJ/day for CONT and REST, respectively; SEM=0.855). Both heat (8.60 and 8.33 MJ/day; SEM=0.437) and recovered energy (-0.10 and -0.30 MJ/day for CONT and REST, respectively; SEM=0.623) were similar between treatments (P ≥ 0.880). In conclusion, increased digestibility appears an important adaptive response to limited availability of drinking water. Elsevier 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7386745/ /pubmed/32734032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2020.100132 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hussein, A.H. Puchala, R. Gipson, T.A. Tadesse, D. Wilson, B.K. Goetsch, A.L. Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep |
title | Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep |
title_full | Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep |
title_fullStr | Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep |
title_short | Effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female St. Croix sheep |
title_sort | effects of water restriction on feed intake, digestion, and energy utilization by mature female st. croix sheep |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7386745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2020.100132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT husseinah effectsofwaterrestrictiononfeedintakedigestionandenergyutilizationbymaturefemalestcroixsheep AT puchalar effectsofwaterrestrictiononfeedintakedigestionandenergyutilizationbymaturefemalestcroixsheep AT gipsonta effectsofwaterrestrictiononfeedintakedigestionandenergyutilizationbymaturefemalestcroixsheep AT tadessed effectsofwaterrestrictiononfeedintakedigestionandenergyutilizationbymaturefemalestcroixsheep AT wilsonbk effectsofwaterrestrictiononfeedintakedigestionandenergyutilizationbymaturefemalestcroixsheep AT goetschal effectsofwaterrestrictiononfeedintakedigestionandenergyutilizationbymaturefemalestcroixsheep |