Cargando…
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the world and is showing increasing prevalence in some countries. The disease has a chronic course that leads to a significant decline in the quality of life of patients and is associated with a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021318 |
_version_ | 1783564057744244736 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Shixiong Jiang, Qian Mu, Xiyan Wang, Zehou Liu, Shaowei Yang, Zeqi Xu, Miaochan Ren, Xuetong Wang, Yangang |
author_facet | Zhang, Shixiong Jiang, Qian Mu, Xiyan Wang, Zehou Liu, Shaowei Yang, Zeqi Xu, Miaochan Ren, Xuetong Wang, Yangang |
author_sort | Zhang, Shixiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the world and is showing increasing prevalence in some countries. The disease has a chronic course that leads to a significant decline in the quality of life of patients and is associated with a high economic burden worldwide. And complementary and alternative medicine is used to treat the disease. Over the past few decades, a number of randomized controlled trials and systematic evaluations have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different types of complementary and alternative medicine methods, so there is an urgent need to summarize and further evaluate these studies. METHODS: We will search the following sources without restrictions for date, language, or publication status: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Bio-medicine Database, VIP Chinese Periodical Database, Wan Fang Database. We will apply a combination of Medical Subject Heading and free-text terms incorporating database-specific controlled vocabularies and text words to implement search strategies. We will also search the ongoing trials registered in the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Besides, the previous relevant reviews conducted on complementary and alternative therapies for GERD and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. RESULTS: This study will provide a reliable basis for the treatment of GERD with complementary and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will be an available reference to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies on GERD and may provide decision-making reference on which method to choose for clinicians. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020169332. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7387018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73870182020-08-05 A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis Zhang, Shixiong Jiang, Qian Mu, Xiyan Wang, Zehou Liu, Shaowei Yang, Zeqi Xu, Miaochan Ren, Xuetong Wang, Yangang Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the world and is showing increasing prevalence in some countries. The disease has a chronic course that leads to a significant decline in the quality of life of patients and is associated with a high economic burden worldwide. And complementary and alternative medicine is used to treat the disease. Over the past few decades, a number of randomized controlled trials and systematic evaluations have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different types of complementary and alternative medicine methods, so there is an urgent need to summarize and further evaluate these studies. METHODS: We will search the following sources without restrictions for date, language, or publication status: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Bio-medicine Database, VIP Chinese Periodical Database, Wan Fang Database. We will apply a combination of Medical Subject Heading and free-text terms incorporating database-specific controlled vocabularies and text words to implement search strategies. We will also search the ongoing trials registered in the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Besides, the previous relevant reviews conducted on complementary and alternative therapies for GERD and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. RESULTS: This study will provide a reliable basis for the treatment of GERD with complementary and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will be an available reference to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies on GERD and may provide decision-making reference on which method to choose for clinicians. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020169332. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7387018/ /pubmed/32791724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021318 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3800 Zhang, Shixiong Jiang, Qian Mu, Xiyan Wang, Zehou Liu, Shaowei Yang, Zeqi Xu, Miaochan Ren, Xuetong Wang, Yangang A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis |
title | A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis |
title_full | A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis |
title_short | A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a protocol for network meta-analysis |
topic | 3800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangshixiong acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT jiangqian acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT muxiyan acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT wangzehou acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT liushaowei acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT yangzeqi acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT xumiaochan acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT renxuetong acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT wangyangang acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT zhangshixiong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT jiangqian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT muxiyan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT wangzehou comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT liushaowei comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT yangzeqi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT xumiaochan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT renxuetong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis AT wangyangang comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis |