Cargando…

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the world and is showing increasing prevalence in some countries. The disease has a chronic course that leads to a significant decline in the quality of life of patients and is associated with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shixiong, Jiang, Qian, Mu, Xiyan, Wang, Zehou, Liu, Shaowei, Yang, Zeqi, Xu, Miaochan, Ren, Xuetong, Wang, Yangang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021318
_version_ 1783564057744244736
author Zhang, Shixiong
Jiang, Qian
Mu, Xiyan
Wang, Zehou
Liu, Shaowei
Yang, Zeqi
Xu, Miaochan
Ren, Xuetong
Wang, Yangang
author_facet Zhang, Shixiong
Jiang, Qian
Mu, Xiyan
Wang, Zehou
Liu, Shaowei
Yang, Zeqi
Xu, Miaochan
Ren, Xuetong
Wang, Yangang
author_sort Zhang, Shixiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the world and is showing increasing prevalence in some countries. The disease has a chronic course that leads to a significant decline in the quality of life of patients and is associated with a high economic burden worldwide. And complementary and alternative medicine is used to treat the disease. Over the past few decades, a number of randomized controlled trials and systematic evaluations have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different types of complementary and alternative medicine methods, so there is an urgent need to summarize and further evaluate these studies. METHODS: We will search the following sources without restrictions for date, language, or publication status: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Bio-medicine Database, VIP Chinese Periodical Database, Wan Fang Database. We will apply a combination of Medical Subject Heading and free-text terms incorporating database-specific controlled vocabularies and text words to implement search strategies. We will also search the ongoing trials registered in the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Besides, the previous relevant reviews conducted on complementary and alternative therapies for GERD and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. RESULTS: This study will provide a reliable basis for the treatment of GERD with complementary and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will be an available reference to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies on GERD and may provide decision-making reference on which method to choose for clinicians. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020169332.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7387018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73870182020-08-05 A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis Zhang, Shixiong Jiang, Qian Mu, Xiyan Wang, Zehou Liu, Shaowei Yang, Zeqi Xu, Miaochan Ren, Xuetong Wang, Yangang Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases in the world and is showing increasing prevalence in some countries. The disease has a chronic course that leads to a significant decline in the quality of life of patients and is associated with a high economic burden worldwide. And complementary and alternative medicine is used to treat the disease. Over the past few decades, a number of randomized controlled trials and systematic evaluations have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different types of complementary and alternative medicine methods, so there is an urgent need to summarize and further evaluate these studies. METHODS: We will search the following sources without restrictions for date, language, or publication status: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Bio-medicine Database, VIP Chinese Periodical Database, Wan Fang Database. We will apply a combination of Medical Subject Heading and free-text terms incorporating database-specific controlled vocabularies and text words to implement search strategies. We will also search the ongoing trials registered in the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Besides, the previous relevant reviews conducted on complementary and alternative therapies for GERD and reference lists of included studies will also be searched. RESULTS: This study will provide a reliable basis for the treatment of GERD with complementary and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will be an available reference to evaluate the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies on GERD and may provide decision-making reference on which method to choose for clinicians. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42020169332. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7387018/ /pubmed/32791724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021318 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Zhang, Shixiong
Jiang, Qian
Mu, Xiyan
Wang, Zehou
Liu, Shaowei
Yang, Zeqi
Xu, Miaochan
Ren, Xuetong
Wang, Yangang
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
title A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
title_short A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for network meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a protocol for network meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021318
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshixiong acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT jiangqian acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT muxiyan acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangzehou acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT liushaowei acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangzeqi acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT xumiaochan acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT renxuetong acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangyangang acomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangshixiong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT jiangqian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT muxiyan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangzehou comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT liushaowei comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT yangzeqi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT xumiaochan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT renxuetong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangyangang comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforgastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseaprotocolfornetworkmetaanalysis