Cargando…

Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models

In this paper we study approaches for dealing with treatment when developing a clinical prediction model. Analogous to the estimand framework recently proposed by the European Medicines Agency for clinical trials, we propose a ‘predictimand’ framework of different questions that may be of interest w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Geloven, Nan, Swanson, Sonja A., Ramspek, Chava L., Luijken, Kim, van Diepen, Merel, Morris, Tim P., Groenwold, Rolf H. H., van Houwelingen, Hans C., Putter, Hein, le Cessie, Saskia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32445007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00636-1
Descripción
Sumario:In this paper we study approaches for dealing with treatment when developing a clinical prediction model. Analogous to the estimand framework recently proposed by the European Medicines Agency for clinical trials, we propose a ‘predictimand’ framework of different questions that may be of interest when predicting risk in relation to treatment started after baseline. We provide a formal definition of the estimands matching these questions, give examples of settings in which each is useful and discuss appropriate estimators including their assumptions. We illustrate the impact of the predictimand choice in a dataset of patients with end-stage kidney disease. We argue that clearly defining the estimand is equally important in prediction research as in causal inference. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10654-020-00636-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.