Cargando…

Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical decisions concerning active surveillance are complex, especially when evidence on superiority of one of the treatments is lacking. Decision aids have been developed to facilitate shared decision-making on whether to pursue an active surveillance strategy. However, it is un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collée, G. E., van der Wilk, B. J., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Busschbach, J. J., Timmermans, L., Lagarde, S. M., Kranenburg, L. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-00962-3
_version_ 1783564098841083904
author Collée, G. E.
van der Wilk, B. J.
van Lanschot, J. J. B.
Busschbach, J. J.
Timmermans, L.
Lagarde, S. M.
Kranenburg, L. W.
author_facet Collée, G. E.
van der Wilk, B. J.
van Lanschot, J. J. B.
Busschbach, J. J.
Timmermans, L.
Lagarde, S. M.
Kranenburg, L. W.
author_sort Collée, G. E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical decisions concerning active surveillance are complex, especially when evidence on superiority of one of the treatments is lacking. Decision aids have been developed to facilitate shared decision-making on whether to pursue an active surveillance strategy. However, it is unclear how these decision aids are designed and which outcomes are considered relevant. The purpose of this study is to systematically review all decision aids in the field of oncological active surveillance strategies and outcomes used by authors to assess their efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: A search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycINFO Ovid and Google Scholar until June 2019. Eligible studies concerned interventions aiming to facilitate shared decision-making for patients confronted with several treatment alternatives, with active surveillance being one of the treatment alternatives. Twenty-three eligible articles were included. Twenty-one articles included patients with prostate cancer, one with thyroid cancer and one with ovarian cancer. Interventions mostly consisted of an interactive web-based decision aid format. After categorization of outcomes, seven main groups were identified: knowledge, involvement in decision-making, decisional conflict, treatment preference, decision regret, anxiety and health-related outcomes. SUMMARY: Although active surveillance has been implemented for several malignancies, interventions that facilitate shared decision-making between active surveillance and other equally effective treatment alternatives are scarce. Future research should focus on developing interventions for malignancies like rectal cancer and oesophageal cancer as well. The efficacy of interventions is mostly assessed using short-term outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11912-020-00962-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7387328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73873282020-08-11 Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature Collée, G. E. van der Wilk, B. J. van Lanschot, J. J. B. Busschbach, J. J. Timmermans, L. Lagarde, S. M. Kranenburg, L. W. Curr Oncol Rep Palliative Medicine (A Jatoi, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Medical decisions concerning active surveillance are complex, especially when evidence on superiority of one of the treatments is lacking. Decision aids have been developed to facilitate shared decision-making on whether to pursue an active surveillance strategy. However, it is unclear how these decision aids are designed and which outcomes are considered relevant. The purpose of this study is to systematically review all decision aids in the field of oncological active surveillance strategies and outcomes used by authors to assess their efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: A search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, PsycINFO Ovid and Google Scholar until June 2019. Eligible studies concerned interventions aiming to facilitate shared decision-making for patients confronted with several treatment alternatives, with active surveillance being one of the treatment alternatives. Twenty-three eligible articles were included. Twenty-one articles included patients with prostate cancer, one with thyroid cancer and one with ovarian cancer. Interventions mostly consisted of an interactive web-based decision aid format. After categorization of outcomes, seven main groups were identified: knowledge, involvement in decision-making, decisional conflict, treatment preference, decision regret, anxiety and health-related outcomes. SUMMARY: Although active surveillance has been implemented for several malignancies, interventions that facilitate shared decision-making between active surveillance and other equally effective treatment alternatives are scarce. Future research should focus on developing interventions for malignancies like rectal cancer and oesophageal cancer as well. The efficacy of interventions is mostly assessed using short-term outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11912-020-00962-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7387328/ /pubmed/32725550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-00962-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative Medicine (A Jatoi, Section Editor)
Collée, G. E.
van der Wilk, B. J.
van Lanschot, J. J. B.
Busschbach, J. J.
Timmermans, L.
Lagarde, S. M.
Kranenburg, L. W.
Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature
title Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature
title_full Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature
title_fullStr Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature
title_short Interventions that Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Cancers with Active Surveillance as Treatment Option: a Systematic Review of Literature
title_sort interventions that facilitate shared decision-making in cancers with active surveillance as treatment option: a systematic review of literature
topic Palliative Medicine (A Jatoi, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32725550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-00962-3
work_keys_str_mv AT colleege interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature
AT vanderwilkbj interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature
AT vanlanschotjjb interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature
AT busschbachjj interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature
AT timmermansl interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature
AT lagardesm interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature
AT kranenburglw interventionsthatfacilitateshareddecisionmakingincancerswithactivesurveillanceastreatmentoptionasystematicreviewofliterature