Cargando…

Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging

Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Michel, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Geriatrics Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743287
http://dx.doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0017
_version_ 1783564156202385408
author Michel, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Michel, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Michel, Jean-Pierre
collection PubMed
description Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in different areas. The Global Age Watch Index focused on 96 countries from around the world, while the Active Ageing index is limited to the European Union countries and the Ageing Society Index targets Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. This paper analyzed and compared the results of these three indexes. The rankings vary little at the bottom end of the scale, with the same countries consistently ranked among the lowest scores (for example, Poland ranked last among the European countries in the three indexes). The same is true at the top of the rankings, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland consistently among the high-scoring countries. However, the three indices tend to differently rank the countries in the middle. The United States, for example, is ranked ninth in the Global Age Watch 2015 and third in the Ageing Societal Index 2018. In cases in which the results are not consistent, it is difficult for politicians and policymakers to adequately identify needs and orient the policy to promote active and healthy aging. There is clearly a compelling need for wide-scale debate to reach a consensus on a comprehensive score or index at the societal level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7387597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Geriatrics Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73875972020-07-30 Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging Michel, Jean-Pierre Ann Geriatr Med Res Invited Review Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in different areas. The Global Age Watch Index focused on 96 countries from around the world, while the Active Ageing index is limited to the European Union countries and the Ageing Society Index targets Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. This paper analyzed and compared the results of these three indexes. The rankings vary little at the bottom end of the scale, with the same countries consistently ranked among the lowest scores (for example, Poland ranked last among the European countries in the three indexes). The same is true at the top of the rankings, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland consistently among the high-scoring countries. However, the three indices tend to differently rank the countries in the middle. The United States, for example, is ranked ninth in the Global Age Watch 2015 and third in the Ageing Societal Index 2018. In cases in which the results are not consistent, it is difficult for politicians and policymakers to adequately identify needs and orient the policy to promote active and healthy aging. There is clearly a compelling need for wide-scale debate to reach a consensus on a comprehensive score or index at the societal level. Korean Geriatrics Society 2019-06 2019-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7387597/ /pubmed/32743287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0017 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Geriatric Society This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Michel, Jean-Pierre
Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_full Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_fullStr Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_short Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
title_sort identification of the best societal measurement of healthy aging
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743287
http://dx.doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0017
work_keys_str_mv AT micheljeanpierre identificationofthebestsocietalmeasurementofhealthyaging