Cargando…
Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging
Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in d...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Geriatrics Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0017 |
_version_ | 1783564156202385408 |
---|---|
author | Michel, Jean-Pierre |
author_facet | Michel, Jean-Pierre |
author_sort | Michel, Jean-Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in different areas. The Global Age Watch Index focused on 96 countries from around the world, while the Active Ageing index is limited to the European Union countries and the Ageing Society Index targets Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. This paper analyzed and compared the results of these three indexes. The rankings vary little at the bottom end of the scale, with the same countries consistently ranked among the lowest scores (for example, Poland ranked last among the European countries in the three indexes). The same is true at the top of the rankings, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland consistently among the high-scoring countries. However, the three indices tend to differently rank the countries in the middle. The United States, for example, is ranked ninth in the Global Age Watch 2015 and third in the Ageing Societal Index 2018. In cases in which the results are not consistent, it is difficult for politicians and policymakers to adequately identify needs and orient the policy to promote active and healthy aging. There is clearly a compelling need for wide-scale debate to reach a consensus on a comprehensive score or index at the societal level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7387597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Geriatrics Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73875972020-07-30 Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging Michel, Jean-Pierre Ann Geriatr Med Res Invited Review Almost six decades after the first proposals to define and evaluate the quality of individual aging, the first indexes for assessing the aging process at the societal level have appeared. Moreover, in five years, three different scores for measuring societal aging have been developed and tested in different areas. The Global Age Watch Index focused on 96 countries from around the world, while the Active Ageing index is limited to the European Union countries and the Ageing Society Index targets Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. This paper analyzed and compared the results of these three indexes. The rankings vary little at the bottom end of the scale, with the same countries consistently ranked among the lowest scores (for example, Poland ranked last among the European countries in the three indexes). The same is true at the top of the rankings, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Ireland consistently among the high-scoring countries. However, the three indices tend to differently rank the countries in the middle. The United States, for example, is ranked ninth in the Global Age Watch 2015 and third in the Ageing Societal Index 2018. In cases in which the results are not consistent, it is difficult for politicians and policymakers to adequately identify needs and orient the policy to promote active and healthy aging. There is clearly a compelling need for wide-scale debate to reach a consensus on a comprehensive score or index at the societal level. Korean Geriatrics Society 2019-06 2019-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7387597/ /pubmed/32743287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0017 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Geriatric Society This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Michel, Jean-Pierre Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging |
title | Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging |
title_full | Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging |
title_fullStr | Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging |
title_short | Identification of the Best Societal Measurement of Healthy Aging |
title_sort | identification of the best societal measurement of healthy aging |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4235/agmr.19.0017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT micheljeanpierre identificationofthebestsocietalmeasurementofhealthyaging |