Cargando…

Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND: The 2017 KDIGO guidelines establish a 2B grade recommendation in favor of testing Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA to assess osteoporotic fracture (OPF) risk in patients with CKD G3a-G5D. Still, controversy remains because large studies evaluating it for this particular population are l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez-Islas, Valeria E., García-Fong, Kevin R., Aguilar-Fuentes, Rosa E., Hernández-Castellanos, Salvador, Pherez-Farah, Alfredo, Méndez-Bribiesca, Sofía A., López-Navarro, Juan M., Osorio-Landa, Hillary K., Carbajal-Morelos, Sergio L., Zúñiga-Guzmán, Areli M., Pérez-Díaz, Iván
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100298
_version_ 1783564193724628992
author Gómez-Islas, Valeria E.
García-Fong, Kevin R.
Aguilar-Fuentes, Rosa E.
Hernández-Castellanos, Salvador
Pherez-Farah, Alfredo
Méndez-Bribiesca, Sofía A.
López-Navarro, Juan M.
Osorio-Landa, Hillary K.
Carbajal-Morelos, Sergio L.
Zúñiga-Guzmán, Areli M.
Pérez-Díaz, Iván
author_facet Gómez-Islas, Valeria E.
García-Fong, Kevin R.
Aguilar-Fuentes, Rosa E.
Hernández-Castellanos, Salvador
Pherez-Farah, Alfredo
Méndez-Bribiesca, Sofía A.
López-Navarro, Juan M.
Osorio-Landa, Hillary K.
Carbajal-Morelos, Sergio L.
Zúñiga-Guzmán, Areli M.
Pérez-Díaz, Iván
author_sort Gómez-Islas, Valeria E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2017 KDIGO guidelines establish a 2B grade recommendation in favor of testing Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA to assess osteoporotic fracture (OPF) risk in patients with CKD G3a-G5D. Still, controversy remains because large studies evaluating it for this particular population are lacking. AIM: To establish the clinical performance of BMD measured by DXA in the evaluation of fracture risk in women with CKD. METHODS: We conducted a 43 year retrospective cohort study with 218 women ≥18 years-old with CKD and BMD measurement by DXA of total hip and lumbar spine. Clinical (age, year of CKD onset, comorbidities, BMI, transplant status, treatment), and biochemical (PTH, corrected calcium, phosphate, vitamin D [25 (OH) D3], creatinine, and albumin), parameters were collected from hospital records. All osteoporotic fractures (as defined by the WHO) found in the clinical and radiologic files were registered. RESULTS: 218 women with a median age of 60 years (40–73 IQ range) and a CKD evolution time of 12 years (7–18 IQ range) were evaluated. Forty-eight (28.23%) presented an OPF. These women were older (57 vs 69 years, p =0.0072) and had a lower BMD. CKD stage did not influence fracture incidence. In the multivariate analysis we found that for each standard deviation decrease in hip and lumbar spine T-Score, the overall fracture risk was 2.7 and 2.04 times higher, respectively. More than 50% of fractures took place within the first ten years of follow-up, especially with GFR <30 mL/min/m(2) and osteoporosis. Diabetes and hypothyroidism accelerated fracture onset, while renal transplant delayed it. In the ROC analysis, the AUC was largest with the total hip (0.7098, p =0.000) and lumbar spine (0.6916, p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: BMD measured by DXA is a useful fracture prediction tool for women with CKD, having a sensibility and specificity similar to that in the general population. It seems to be appropriate for the diagnosis, treatment decisions, and follow-up of patients with renal failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7387779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73877792020-07-31 Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease Gómez-Islas, Valeria E. García-Fong, Kevin R. Aguilar-Fuentes, Rosa E. Hernández-Castellanos, Salvador Pherez-Farah, Alfredo Méndez-Bribiesca, Sofía A. López-Navarro, Juan M. Osorio-Landa, Hillary K. Carbajal-Morelos, Sergio L. Zúñiga-Guzmán, Areli M. Pérez-Díaz, Iván Bone Rep Article BACKGROUND: The 2017 KDIGO guidelines establish a 2B grade recommendation in favor of testing Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA to assess osteoporotic fracture (OPF) risk in patients with CKD G3a-G5D. Still, controversy remains because large studies evaluating it for this particular population are lacking. AIM: To establish the clinical performance of BMD measured by DXA in the evaluation of fracture risk in women with CKD. METHODS: We conducted a 43 year retrospective cohort study with 218 women ≥18 years-old with CKD and BMD measurement by DXA of total hip and lumbar spine. Clinical (age, year of CKD onset, comorbidities, BMI, transplant status, treatment), and biochemical (PTH, corrected calcium, phosphate, vitamin D [25 (OH) D3], creatinine, and albumin), parameters were collected from hospital records. All osteoporotic fractures (as defined by the WHO) found in the clinical and radiologic files were registered. RESULTS: 218 women with a median age of 60 years (40–73 IQ range) and a CKD evolution time of 12 years (7–18 IQ range) were evaluated. Forty-eight (28.23%) presented an OPF. These women were older (57 vs 69 years, p =0.0072) and had a lower BMD. CKD stage did not influence fracture incidence. In the multivariate analysis we found that for each standard deviation decrease in hip and lumbar spine T-Score, the overall fracture risk was 2.7 and 2.04 times higher, respectively. More than 50% of fractures took place within the first ten years of follow-up, especially with GFR <30 mL/min/m(2) and osteoporosis. Diabetes and hypothyroidism accelerated fracture onset, while renal transplant delayed it. In the ROC analysis, the AUC was largest with the total hip (0.7098, p =0.000) and lumbar spine (0.6916, p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: BMD measured by DXA is a useful fracture prediction tool for women with CKD, having a sensibility and specificity similar to that in the general population. It seems to be appropriate for the diagnosis, treatment decisions, and follow-up of patients with renal failure. Elsevier 2020-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7387779/ /pubmed/32743028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100298 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gómez-Islas, Valeria E.
García-Fong, Kevin R.
Aguilar-Fuentes, Rosa E.
Hernández-Castellanos, Salvador
Pherez-Farah, Alfredo
Méndez-Bribiesca, Sofía A.
López-Navarro, Juan M.
Osorio-Landa, Hillary K.
Carbajal-Morelos, Sergio L.
Zúñiga-Guzmán, Areli M.
Pérez-Díaz, Iván
Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
title Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
title_full Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
title_fullStr Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
title_short Evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
title_sort evaluation of bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a fracture prediction tool in women with chronic kidney disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7387779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32743028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100298
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezislasvaleriae evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT garciafongkevinr evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT aguilarfuentesrosae evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT hernandezcastellanossalvador evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT pherezfarahalfredo evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT mendezbribiescasofiaa evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT lopeznavarrojuanm evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT osoriolandahillaryk evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT carbajalmorelossergiol evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT zunigaguzmanarelim evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease
AT perezdiazivan evaluationofbonedensitometrybydualenergyxrayabsorptiometryasafracturepredictiontoolinwomenwithchronickidneydisease