Cargando…
Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002)
Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto Company, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of EFSA (GMO) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation applicati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742435 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6199 |
_version_ | 1783564272578592768 |
---|---|
author | Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Raffaello, Tommaso |
author_facet | Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Raffaello, Tommaso |
collection | PubMed |
description | Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto Company, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of EFSA (GMO) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified oilseed rape GT73. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatic analyses and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in oilseed rape GT73 considered for renewal of authorisation is identical to the sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in renewal application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on oilseed rape GT73. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7388236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73882362020-07-31 Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto Company, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of EFSA (GMO) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified oilseed rape GT73. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatic analyses and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in oilseed rape GT73 considered for renewal of authorisation is identical to the sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in renewal application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on oilseed rape GT73. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7388236/ /pubmed/32742435 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6199 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele Raffaello, Tommaso Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) |
title | Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape GT73 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐002) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape gt73 for renewal authorisation under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐rx‐002) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742435 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapegt73forrenewalauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx002 |