Cargando…

Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has proven to be a major problem for the porcine industry worldwide. Conventional injectable vaccines induce effective systemic immune responses but are less effective in preventing PEDV at mucosal invasion sites, including the nasal or oral mucosa. Additionall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, En, Wang, Jialu, Li, Yuchen, Huang, Lulu, Wang, Yongheng, Yang, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8828
_version_ 1783564287108710400
author Zhang, En
Wang, Jialu
Li, Yuchen
Huang, Lulu
Wang, Yongheng
Yang, Qian
author_facet Zhang, En
Wang, Jialu
Li, Yuchen
Huang, Lulu
Wang, Yongheng
Yang, Qian
author_sort Zhang, En
collection PubMed
description Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has proven to be a major problem for the porcine industry worldwide. Conventional injectable vaccines induce effective systemic immune responses but are less effective in preventing PEDV at mucosal invasion sites, including the nasal or oral mucosa. Additionally, antigens delivered orally are easily degraded. Nasal immunization induces intestinal mucosal immune responses, which can aid in blocking viral invasion, and requires fewer antigen inoculation doses. Therefore, nasal immunizations are considered to be a potential approach to overcome viral infections. In the present study, nasal immunization of piglets was performed using inactivated PEDV combined with Bacillus subtilis as an immunopotentiator and the efficacy of nasal immunization was assessed. The results demonstrated that compared with oral immunization, piglets from the nasal immunization group exhibited higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P<0.01) in the intestine, PEDV-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G (P<0.01) in serum and PEDV-specific secretory IgA (SIgA) in saliva (P<0.01) and nasal secretions (P<0.01). An increased number of intestinal CD3(+) T cells, IgA-secreting cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes (P<0.05) were also observed. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of interleukin-6 and interferon-γ, relative to the control PEDV infection, were also significantly elevated (P<0.05). The results of the present study indicate that nasal immunization is more effective at inducing the intestinal mucosal immune response, and provide new insights into a novel vaccination strategy that may be used to decrease the incidence of PEDV infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7388329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73883292020-07-31 Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets Zhang, En Wang, Jialu Li, Yuchen Huang, Lulu Wang, Yongheng Yang, Qian Exp Ther Med Articles Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has proven to be a major problem for the porcine industry worldwide. Conventional injectable vaccines induce effective systemic immune responses but are less effective in preventing PEDV at mucosal invasion sites, including the nasal or oral mucosa. Additionally, antigens delivered orally are easily degraded. Nasal immunization induces intestinal mucosal immune responses, which can aid in blocking viral invasion, and requires fewer antigen inoculation doses. Therefore, nasal immunizations are considered to be a potential approach to overcome viral infections. In the present study, nasal immunization of piglets was performed using inactivated PEDV combined with Bacillus subtilis as an immunopotentiator and the efficacy of nasal immunization was assessed. The results demonstrated that compared with oral immunization, piglets from the nasal immunization group exhibited higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P<0.01) in the intestine, PEDV-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G (P<0.01) in serum and PEDV-specific secretory IgA (SIgA) in saliva (P<0.01) and nasal secretions (P<0.01). An increased number of intestinal CD3(+) T cells, IgA-secreting cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes (P<0.05) were also observed. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of interleukin-6 and interferon-γ, relative to the control PEDV infection, were also significantly elevated (P<0.05). The results of the present study indicate that nasal immunization is more effective at inducing the intestinal mucosal immune response, and provide new insights into a novel vaccination strategy that may be used to decrease the incidence of PEDV infections. D.A. Spandidos 2020-08 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7388329/ /pubmed/32742391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8828 Text en Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Zhang, En
Wang, Jialu
Li, Yuchen
Huang, Lulu
Wang, Yongheng
Yang, Qian
Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
title Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
title_full Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
title_fullStr Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
title_short Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
title_sort comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32742391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8828
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangen comparisonoforalandnasalimmunizationwithinactivatedporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusonintestinalimmunityinpiglets
AT wangjialu comparisonoforalandnasalimmunizationwithinactivatedporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusonintestinalimmunityinpiglets
AT liyuchen comparisonoforalandnasalimmunizationwithinactivatedporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusonintestinalimmunityinpiglets
AT huanglulu comparisonoforalandnasalimmunizationwithinactivatedporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusonintestinalimmunityinpiglets
AT wangyongheng comparisonoforalandnasalimmunizationwithinactivatedporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusonintestinalimmunityinpiglets
AT yangqian comparisonoforalandnasalimmunizationwithinactivatedporcineepidemicdiarrheavirusonintestinalimmunityinpiglets