Cargando…

What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?

BACKGROUND: Animal fluency is a widely used task to assess people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurological disorders. The mechanisms that drive performance in this task are argued to rely on language and executive functions. However, there is little information regarding what specific as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rofes, Adrià, de Aguiar, Vânia, Jonkers, Roel, Oh, Se Jin, DeDe, Gayle, Sung, Jee Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01485
_version_ 1783564367811313664
author Rofes, Adrià
de Aguiar, Vânia
Jonkers, Roel
Oh, Se Jin
DeDe, Gayle
Sung, Jee Eun
author_facet Rofes, Adrià
de Aguiar, Vânia
Jonkers, Roel
Oh, Se Jin
DeDe, Gayle
Sung, Jee Eun
author_sort Rofes, Adrià
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Animal fluency is a widely used task to assess people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurological disorders. The mechanisms that drive performance in this task are argued to rely on language and executive functions. However, there is little information regarding what specific aspects of these cognitive processes drive performance on this task. OBJECTIVE: To understand which aspects of language (i.e., semantics, phonological output lexicon, phonological assembly) and executive function (i.e., mental set shifting; information updating and monitoring; inhibition of possible responses) are involved in the performance of animal fluency in people with AD. METHODS: Animal fluency data from 58 people with probable AD from the DementiaBank Pittsburgh Corpus were analyzed. Number of clusters and switches were measured and nine word properties (e.g., frequency, familiarity) for each of the correct words (i.e., each word counting toward the total score, disregarding non-animals and repetitions) were determined. Random forests were used to understand which variables predicted the total number of correct words, and conditional inference trees were used to search for interactions between the variables. Finally, Wilcoxon tests were implemented to cross-validate the results, by comparing the performance of participants with scores below the norm in animal fluency against participants with scores within the norm based on a large normative sample. RESULTS: Switches and age of acquisition emerged as the most important variables to predict total number of correct words in animal fluency in people with AD. Cross-validating the results, people with AD whose animal fluency scores fell below the norm produced fewer switches and words with lower age of acquisition than people with AD with scores in the normal range. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that people with AD rely on executive functioning (information updating and monitoring) and language (phonological output lexicon, not necessarily semantics) to produce words on animal fluency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7388773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73887732020-08-07 What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease? Rofes, Adrià de Aguiar, Vânia Jonkers, Roel Oh, Se Jin DeDe, Gayle Sung, Jee Eun Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Animal fluency is a widely used task to assess people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurological disorders. The mechanisms that drive performance in this task are argued to rely on language and executive functions. However, there is little information regarding what specific aspects of these cognitive processes drive performance on this task. OBJECTIVE: To understand which aspects of language (i.e., semantics, phonological output lexicon, phonological assembly) and executive function (i.e., mental set shifting; information updating and monitoring; inhibition of possible responses) are involved in the performance of animal fluency in people with AD. METHODS: Animal fluency data from 58 people with probable AD from the DementiaBank Pittsburgh Corpus were analyzed. Number of clusters and switches were measured and nine word properties (e.g., frequency, familiarity) for each of the correct words (i.e., each word counting toward the total score, disregarding non-animals and repetitions) were determined. Random forests were used to understand which variables predicted the total number of correct words, and conditional inference trees were used to search for interactions between the variables. Finally, Wilcoxon tests were implemented to cross-validate the results, by comparing the performance of participants with scores below the norm in animal fluency against participants with scores within the norm based on a large normative sample. RESULTS: Switches and age of acquisition emerged as the most important variables to predict total number of correct words in animal fluency in people with AD. Cross-validating the results, people with AD whose animal fluency scores fell below the norm produced fewer switches and words with lower age of acquisition than people with AD with scores in the normal range. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that people with AD rely on executive functioning (information updating and monitoring) and language (phonological output lexicon, not necessarily semantics) to produce words on animal fluency. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7388773/ /pubmed/32774312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01485 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rofes, de Aguiar, Jonkers, Oh, DeDe and Sung. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Rofes, Adrià
de Aguiar, Vânia
Jonkers, Roel
Oh, Se Jin
DeDe, Gayle
Sung, Jee Eun
What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?
title What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?
title_full What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?
title_fullStr What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?
title_full_unstemmed What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?
title_short What Drives Task Performance During Animal Fluency in People With Alzheimer’s Disease?
title_sort what drives task performance during animal fluency in people with alzheimer’s disease?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32774312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01485
work_keys_str_mv AT rofesadria whatdrivestaskperformanceduringanimalfluencyinpeoplewithalzheimersdisease
AT deaguiarvania whatdrivestaskperformanceduringanimalfluencyinpeoplewithalzheimersdisease
AT jonkersroel whatdrivestaskperformanceduringanimalfluencyinpeoplewithalzheimersdisease
AT ohsejin whatdrivestaskperformanceduringanimalfluencyinpeoplewithalzheimersdisease
AT dedegayle whatdrivestaskperformanceduringanimalfluencyinpeoplewithalzheimersdisease
AT sungjeeeun whatdrivestaskperformanceduringanimalfluencyinpeoplewithalzheimersdisease