Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)

BACKGROUND: For loco-regionally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), the current standard of care includes surgical resection and risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, or definite chemoradiation with or without salvage surgery. While transoral surgery for OPSCC ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bußmann, Lara, Laban, Simon, Wittekindt, Claus, Stromberger, Carmen, Tribius, Silke, Möckelmann, Nikolaus, Böttcher, Arne, Betz, Christian Stephan, Klussmann, Jens Peter, Budach, Volker, Muenscher, Adrian, Busch, Chia-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7389683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07127-2
_version_ 1783564419595239424
author Bußmann, Lara
Laban, Simon
Wittekindt, Claus
Stromberger, Carmen
Tribius, Silke
Möckelmann, Nikolaus
Böttcher, Arne
Betz, Christian Stephan
Klussmann, Jens Peter
Budach, Volker
Muenscher, Adrian
Busch, Chia-Jung
author_facet Bußmann, Lara
Laban, Simon
Wittekindt, Claus
Stromberger, Carmen
Tribius, Silke
Möckelmann, Nikolaus
Böttcher, Arne
Betz, Christian Stephan
Klussmann, Jens Peter
Budach, Volker
Muenscher, Adrian
Busch, Chia-Jung
author_sort Bußmann, Lara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For loco-regionally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), the current standard of care includes surgical resection and risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, or definite chemoradiation with or without salvage surgery. While transoral surgery for OPSCC has increased over the last decade for example in the United States due to transoral robotic surgery, this treatment approach has a long history in Germany. In contrast to Anglo-Saxon countries, transoral surgical approaches have been used frequently in Germany to treat patients with oro-, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancer. Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) has had a long tradition since its introduction in the early 70s. To date, the different therapeutic approaches to transorally resectable OPSCC have not been directly compared to each other in a randomized trial concerning disease control and survival. The goal of this study is to compare initial transoral surgery to definitive chemoradiation for resectable OPSCC, especially with regards to local and regional control. METHODS: TopROC is a prospective, two-arm, open label, multicenter, randomized, and controlled comparative effectiveness study. Eligible patients are ≥18 years old with treatment-naïve, histologically proven OPSCC (T1, N2a-c, M0; T2, N1–2c, M0; T3, N0-2c, M0 UICC vers. 7) which are amenable to transoral resection. Two hundred eighty patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to surgical treatment (arm A) or chemoradiation (arm B). Standard of care treatment will be performed according to daily routine practice. Arm A consists of transoral surgical resection with neck dissection followed by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy. Patients treated in arm B receive standard chemoradiation, residual tumor may be subject to salvage surgery. Follow-up visits for 3 years are planned. Primary endpoint is time to local or locoregional failure (LRF). Secondary endpoints include overall and disease free survival, toxicity, and patient reported outcomes. Approximately 20 centers will be involved in Germany. This trial is supported by the German Cancer Aid and accompanied by a scientific support program. DISCUSSION: This study will shed light on an urgently-needed randomized comparison of the strategy of primary chemoradiation vs. primary surgical approach. As a comparative effectiveness trial, it is designed to provide data based on two established regimens in daily clinical routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03691441 Registered 1 October 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7389683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73896832020-07-31 Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC) Bußmann, Lara Laban, Simon Wittekindt, Claus Stromberger, Carmen Tribius, Silke Möckelmann, Nikolaus Böttcher, Arne Betz, Christian Stephan Klussmann, Jens Peter Budach, Volker Muenscher, Adrian Busch, Chia-Jung BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: For loco-regionally advanced, but transorally resectable oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC), the current standard of care includes surgical resection and risk-adapted adjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy, or definite chemoradiation with or without salvage surgery. While transoral surgery for OPSCC has increased over the last decade for example in the United States due to transoral robotic surgery, this treatment approach has a long history in Germany. In contrast to Anglo-Saxon countries, transoral surgical approaches have been used frequently in Germany to treat patients with oro-, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal cancer. Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) has had a long tradition since its introduction in the early 70s. To date, the different therapeutic approaches to transorally resectable OPSCC have not been directly compared to each other in a randomized trial concerning disease control and survival. The goal of this study is to compare initial transoral surgery to definitive chemoradiation for resectable OPSCC, especially with regards to local and regional control. METHODS: TopROC is a prospective, two-arm, open label, multicenter, randomized, and controlled comparative effectiveness study. Eligible patients are ≥18 years old with treatment-naïve, histologically proven OPSCC (T1, N2a-c, M0; T2, N1–2c, M0; T3, N0-2c, M0 UICC vers. 7) which are amenable to transoral resection. Two hundred eighty patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to surgical treatment (arm A) or chemoradiation (arm B). Standard of care treatment will be performed according to daily routine practice. Arm A consists of transoral surgical resection with neck dissection followed by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy. Patients treated in arm B receive standard chemoradiation, residual tumor may be subject to salvage surgery. Follow-up visits for 3 years are planned. Primary endpoint is time to local or locoregional failure (LRF). Secondary endpoints include overall and disease free survival, toxicity, and patient reported outcomes. Approximately 20 centers will be involved in Germany. This trial is supported by the German Cancer Aid and accompanied by a scientific support program. DISCUSSION: This study will shed light on an urgently-needed randomized comparison of the strategy of primary chemoradiation vs. primary surgical approach. As a comparative effectiveness trial, it is designed to provide data based on two established regimens in daily clinical routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03691441 Registered 1 October 2018 - Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7389683/ /pubmed/32727416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07127-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bußmann, Lara
Laban, Simon
Wittekindt, Claus
Stromberger, Carmen
Tribius, Silke
Möckelmann, Nikolaus
Böttcher, Arne
Betz, Christian Stephan
Klussmann, Jens Peter
Budach, Volker
Muenscher, Adrian
Busch, Chia-Jung
Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)
title Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)
title_full Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)
title_short Comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (TopROC)
title_sort comparative effectiveness trial of transoral head and neck surgery followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy versus primary radiochemotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer (toproc)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7389683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07127-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bußmannlara comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT labansimon comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT wittekindtclaus comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT strombergercarmen comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT tribiussilke comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT mockelmannnikolaus comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT bottcherarne comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT betzchristianstephan comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT klussmannjenspeter comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT budachvolker comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT muenscheradrian comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc
AT buschchiajung comparativeeffectivenesstrialoftransoralheadandnecksurgeryfollowedbyadjuvantradiochemotherapyversusprimaryradiochemotherapyfororopharyngealcancertoproc