Cargando…
Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners
Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of health care quality, and it remains an important goal for optimal treatment outcomes to reduce the level of misdiagnoses and inappropriate or absent therapeutic actions. Digital support tools for differential diagnosis to assist clinicians in reachin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32726308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235410 |
_version_ | 1783564437871919104 |
---|---|
author | Breitbart, Eckhard W. Choudhury, Kohelia Andersen, Anders Daniel Bunde, Henriette Breitbart, Marianne Sideri, Antonia Maria Fengler, Susanne Zibert, John Robert |
author_facet | Breitbart, Eckhard W. Choudhury, Kohelia Andersen, Anders Daniel Bunde, Henriette Breitbart, Marianne Sideri, Antonia Maria Fengler, Susanne Zibert, John Robert |
author_sort | Breitbart, Eckhard W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of health care quality, and it remains an important goal for optimal treatment outcomes to reduce the level of misdiagnoses and inappropriate or absent therapeutic actions. Digital support tools for differential diagnosis to assist clinicians in reaching the correct diagnosis may be helpful, but how the use of these affect patients is not clear. The primary objective of this feasibility study was to investigate patient experience and satisfaction in a primary care setting where general practitioners (GPs) used a visual clinical decision support system (CDSS) compared with standard consultations. Secondary objectives were diagnostic accuracy and length of consultation. Thirty-one patients with a dermatologist-confirmed skin diagnosis were allocated to consult GPs that had been randomized to conduct either standard consultations (SDR, n = 21) or CDSS (n = 16) on two separate study days one week apart. All patients were diagnosed independently by multiple GPs (n = 3–8) in both the SDR and CDSS study arms. Using the CDSS, more patients felt involved in the decision making (P = 0.05). In addition, more patients were exposed to images during the consultations (P = 6.8e-27), and 83% of those that were shown images replied they felt better supported in the consultation. The use of CDSS significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy (34%, P = 0.007), and did not increase the duration of the consultation (median 10 minutes in both arms). This study shows for the first time that compared with standard GP consultations, CDSS assist the GP on skin related diagnoses and improve patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy without impacting the duration of the consultations. This is likely to increase correct treatment choices, patient adherence, and overall result in better healthcare outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7390264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73902642020-08-05 Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners Breitbart, Eckhard W. Choudhury, Kohelia Andersen, Anders Daniel Bunde, Henriette Breitbart, Marianne Sideri, Antonia Maria Fengler, Susanne Zibert, John Robert PLoS One Research Article Patient satisfaction is an important indicator of health care quality, and it remains an important goal for optimal treatment outcomes to reduce the level of misdiagnoses and inappropriate or absent therapeutic actions. Digital support tools for differential diagnosis to assist clinicians in reaching the correct diagnosis may be helpful, but how the use of these affect patients is not clear. The primary objective of this feasibility study was to investigate patient experience and satisfaction in a primary care setting where general practitioners (GPs) used a visual clinical decision support system (CDSS) compared with standard consultations. Secondary objectives were diagnostic accuracy and length of consultation. Thirty-one patients with a dermatologist-confirmed skin diagnosis were allocated to consult GPs that had been randomized to conduct either standard consultations (SDR, n = 21) or CDSS (n = 16) on two separate study days one week apart. All patients were diagnosed independently by multiple GPs (n = 3–8) in both the SDR and CDSS study arms. Using the CDSS, more patients felt involved in the decision making (P = 0.05). In addition, more patients were exposed to images during the consultations (P = 6.8e-27), and 83% of those that were shown images replied they felt better supported in the consultation. The use of CDSS significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy (34%, P = 0.007), and did not increase the duration of the consultation (median 10 minutes in both arms). This study shows for the first time that compared with standard GP consultations, CDSS assist the GP on skin related diagnoses and improve patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy without impacting the duration of the consultations. This is likely to increase correct treatment choices, patient adherence, and overall result in better healthcare outcomes. Public Library of Science 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7390264/ /pubmed/32726308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235410 Text en © 2020 Breitbart et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Breitbart, Eckhard W. Choudhury, Kohelia Andersen, Anders Daniel Bunde, Henriette Breitbart, Marianne Sideri, Antonia Maria Fengler, Susanne Zibert, John Robert Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners |
title | Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners |
title_full | Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners |
title_fullStr | Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners |
title_short | Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System—A feasibility study with general practitioners |
title_sort | improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a visual clinical decision support system—a feasibility study with general practitioners |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32726308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breitbarteckhardw improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT choudhurykohelia improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT andersenandersdaniel improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT bundehenriette improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT breitbartmarianne improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT sideriantoniamaria improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT fenglersusanne improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners AT zibertjohnrobert improvedpatientsatisfactionanddiagnosticaccuracyinskindiseaseswithavisualclinicaldecisionsupportsystemafeasibilitystudywithgeneralpractitioners |