Cargando…

Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study

BACKGROUND: To increase the push-out bond strength of endodontic materials, newer obturation materials and obturation techniques are being introduced. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of three different obturating materials using a universal testing machine (UTM)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja, Prasad, L. Karthik, Ramachandruni, Nimeshika, Kamishetty, Shekar, Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792822
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18
_version_ 1783564455349583872
author Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja
Prasad, L. Karthik
Ramachandruni, Nimeshika
Kamishetty, Shekar
Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra
author_facet Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja
Prasad, L. Karthik
Ramachandruni, Nimeshika
Kamishetty, Shekar
Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra
author_sort Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To increase the push-out bond strength of endodontic materials, newer obturation materials and obturation techniques are being introduced. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of three different obturating materials using a universal testing machine (UTM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of thirty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and randomly divided into three groups of ten each. Biomechanical preparation was done in all the teeth, and they were then divided into three experimental groups according to the obturation material and technique used, as follows: Group I: gutta-percha (GP) with AH Plus root canal sealer (lateral condensation); Group II: thermoplasticized GP technique – noncarrier based (CALAMUS(®)) with AH Plus sealer (backfill); and Group III: C-points (self-sealing root canal obturating system) with bioceramic sealer (single cone). Each specimen was subjected to push-out test using the UTM, where the punch moved in an apical to coronal direction at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, which resulted in the displacement of the filling material. The depth of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope at ×30 magnification. RESULTS: All the analyses were performed using SPSS software version 16. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparisons of mean values were done using ANOVA with post hoc Games–Howell test and ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test. Group III demonstrated the highest mean push-out bond strength and Group I exhibited the least bond strength. A statistically significant difference was found between Group III and Group I with regard to the push-out bond strength assessment. CONCLUSION: Push-out bond strength differs among different obturation materials and obturation techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7390420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73904202020-08-12 Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja Prasad, L. Karthik Ramachandruni, Nimeshika Kamishetty, Shekar Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: To increase the push-out bond strength of endodontic materials, newer obturation materials and obturation techniques are being introduced. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of three different obturating materials using a universal testing machine (UTM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of thirty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and randomly divided into three groups of ten each. Biomechanical preparation was done in all the teeth, and they were then divided into three experimental groups according to the obturation material and technique used, as follows: Group I: gutta-percha (GP) with AH Plus root canal sealer (lateral condensation); Group II: thermoplasticized GP technique – noncarrier based (CALAMUS(®)) with AH Plus sealer (backfill); and Group III: C-points (self-sealing root canal obturating system) with bioceramic sealer (single cone). Each specimen was subjected to push-out test using the UTM, where the punch moved in an apical to coronal direction at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, which resulted in the displacement of the filling material. The depth of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope at ×30 magnification. RESULTS: All the analyses were performed using SPSS software version 16. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparisons of mean values were done using ANOVA with post hoc Games–Howell test and ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test. Group III demonstrated the highest mean push-out bond strength and Group I exhibited the least bond strength. A statistically significant difference was found between Group III and Group I with regard to the push-out bond strength assessment. CONCLUSION: Push-out bond strength differs among different obturation materials and obturation techniques. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7390420/ /pubmed/32792822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja
Prasad, L. Karthik
Ramachandruni, Nimeshika
Kamishetty, Shekar
Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra
Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
title Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
title_full Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
title_short Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
title_sort comparison of push-out bond strength of three different obturating systems to intraradicular dentin: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792822
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18
work_keys_str_mv AT moinuddinmohammedkhwaja comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy
AT prasadlkarthik comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy
AT ramachandruninimeshika comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy
AT kamishettyshekar comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy
AT cherkupalliravichandra comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy