Cargando…
Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study
BACKGROUND: To increase the push-out bond strength of endodontic materials, newer obturation materials and obturation techniques are being introduced. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of three different obturating materials using a universal testing machine (UTM)....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18 |
_version_ | 1783564455349583872 |
---|---|
author | Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja Prasad, L. Karthik Ramachandruni, Nimeshika Kamishetty, Shekar Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra |
author_facet | Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja Prasad, L. Karthik Ramachandruni, Nimeshika Kamishetty, Shekar Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra |
author_sort | Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To increase the push-out bond strength of endodontic materials, newer obturation materials and obturation techniques are being introduced. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of three different obturating materials using a universal testing machine (UTM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of thirty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and randomly divided into three groups of ten each. Biomechanical preparation was done in all the teeth, and they were then divided into three experimental groups according to the obturation material and technique used, as follows: Group I: gutta-percha (GP) with AH Plus root canal sealer (lateral condensation); Group II: thermoplasticized GP technique – noncarrier based (CALAMUS(®)) with AH Plus sealer (backfill); and Group III: C-points (self-sealing root canal obturating system) with bioceramic sealer (single cone). Each specimen was subjected to push-out test using the UTM, where the punch moved in an apical to coronal direction at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, which resulted in the displacement of the filling material. The depth of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope at ×30 magnification. RESULTS: All the analyses were performed using SPSS software version 16. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparisons of mean values were done using ANOVA with post hoc Games–Howell test and ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test. Group III demonstrated the highest mean push-out bond strength and Group I exhibited the least bond strength. A statistically significant difference was found between Group III and Group I with regard to the push-out bond strength assessment. CONCLUSION: Push-out bond strength differs among different obturation materials and obturation techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7390420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73904202020-08-12 Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja Prasad, L. Karthik Ramachandruni, Nimeshika Kamishetty, Shekar Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: To increase the push-out bond strength of endodontic materials, newer obturation materials and obturation techniques are being introduced. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the push-out bond strength of three different obturating materials using a universal testing machine (UTM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of thirty freshly extracted maxillary anterior teeth were collected and randomly divided into three groups of ten each. Biomechanical preparation was done in all the teeth, and they were then divided into three experimental groups according to the obturation material and technique used, as follows: Group I: gutta-percha (GP) with AH Plus root canal sealer (lateral condensation); Group II: thermoplasticized GP technique – noncarrier based (CALAMUS(®)) with AH Plus sealer (backfill); and Group III: C-points (self-sealing root canal obturating system) with bioceramic sealer (single cone). Each specimen was subjected to push-out test using the UTM, where the punch moved in an apical to coronal direction at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, which resulted in the displacement of the filling material. The depth of dye penetration was examined under a stereomicroscope at ×30 magnification. RESULTS: All the analyses were performed using SPSS software version 16. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparisons of mean values were done using ANOVA with post hoc Games–Howell test and ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test. Group III demonstrated the highest mean push-out bond strength and Group I exhibited the least bond strength. A statistically significant difference was found between Group III and Group I with regard to the push-out bond strength assessment. CONCLUSION: Push-out bond strength differs among different obturation materials and obturation techniques. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7390420/ /pubmed/32792822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moinuddin, Mohammed Khwaja Prasad, L. Karthik Ramachandruni, Nimeshika Kamishetty, Shekar Cherkupalli, Ravi Chandra Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study |
title | Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study |
title_full | Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study |
title_short | Comparison of Push-out Bond Strength of Three Different Obturating Systems to Intraradicular Dentin: An In vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of push-out bond strength of three different obturating systems to intraradicular dentin: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_640_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moinuddinmohammedkhwaja comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy AT prasadlkarthik comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy AT ramachandruninimeshika comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy AT kamishettyshekar comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy AT cherkupalliravichandra comparisonofpushoutbondstrengthofthreedifferentobturatingsystemstointraradiculardentinaninvitrostudy |