Cargando…
Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19
INTRODUCTION: Current recommendations for diagnostic imaging for moderately to severely ill patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include chest radiograph (CXR). Our primary objective was to determine whether lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines, when excluding patients with alternati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32726240 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.5.47743 |
_version_ | 1783564481384677376 |
---|---|
author | Pare, Joseph R. Camelo, Ingrid Mayo, Kelly C. Leo, Megan M. Dugas, Julianne N. Nelson, Kerrie P. Baker, William E. Shareef, Faizah Mitchell, Patricia M. Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M. |
author_facet | Pare, Joseph R. Camelo, Ingrid Mayo, Kelly C. Leo, Megan M. Dugas, Julianne N. Nelson, Kerrie P. Baker, William E. Shareef, Faizah Mitchell, Patricia M. Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M. |
author_sort | Pare, Joseph R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Current recommendations for diagnostic imaging for moderately to severely ill patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include chest radiograph (CXR). Our primary objective was to determine whether lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines, when excluding patients with alternative etiologies for B-lines, are more sensitive for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19 than CXR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a single, academic emergency department in the United States between March 20 and April 6, 2020, and received LUS, CXR, and viral testing for COVID-19 as part of their diagnostic evaluation. The primary objective was to estimate the test characteristics of both LUS B-lines and CXR for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with COVID-19 that have secondary LUS findings of pleural abnormalities and subpleural consolidations. RESULTS: We identified 43 patients who underwent both LUS and CXR and were tested for COVID-19. Of these, 27/43 (63%) tested positive. LUS was more sensitive (88.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 71.1–97.0) for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19 than CXR (51.9%, 95% CI, 34.0–69.3; p = 0.013). LUS and CXR specificity were 56.3% (95% CI, 33.2–76.9) and 75.0% (95% CI, 50.0–90.3), respectively (p = 0.453). Secondary LUS findings of patients with COVID-19 demonstrated 21/27 (77.8%) had pleural abnormalities and 10/27 (37%) had subpleural consolidations. CONCLUSION: Among patients who underwent LUS and CXR, LUS was found to have a higher sensitivity than CXR for the evaluation of COVID-19. This data could have important implications as an aid in the diagnostic evaluation of COVID-19, particularly where viral testing is not available or restricted. If generalizable, future directions would include defining how to incorporate LUS into clinical management and its role in screening lower-risk populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7390587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73905872020-07-31 Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 Pare, Joseph R. Camelo, Ingrid Mayo, Kelly C. Leo, Megan M. Dugas, Julianne N. Nelson, Kerrie P. Baker, William E. Shareef, Faizah Mitchell, Patricia M. Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M. West J Emerg Med Endemic Infections INTRODUCTION: Current recommendations for diagnostic imaging for moderately to severely ill patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include chest radiograph (CXR). Our primary objective was to determine whether lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines, when excluding patients with alternative etiologies for B-lines, are more sensitive for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19 than CXR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a single, academic emergency department in the United States between March 20 and April 6, 2020, and received LUS, CXR, and viral testing for COVID-19 as part of their diagnostic evaluation. The primary objective was to estimate the test characteristics of both LUS B-lines and CXR for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with COVID-19 that have secondary LUS findings of pleural abnormalities and subpleural consolidations. RESULTS: We identified 43 patients who underwent both LUS and CXR and were tested for COVID-19. Of these, 27/43 (63%) tested positive. LUS was more sensitive (88.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 71.1–97.0) for the associated diagnosis of COVID-19 than CXR (51.9%, 95% CI, 34.0–69.3; p = 0.013). LUS and CXR specificity were 56.3% (95% CI, 33.2–76.9) and 75.0% (95% CI, 50.0–90.3), respectively (p = 0.453). Secondary LUS findings of patients with COVID-19 demonstrated 21/27 (77.8%) had pleural abnormalities and 10/27 (37%) had subpleural consolidations. CONCLUSION: Among patients who underwent LUS and CXR, LUS was found to have a higher sensitivity than CXR for the evaluation of COVID-19. This data could have important implications as an aid in the diagnostic evaluation of COVID-19, particularly where viral testing is not available or restricted. If generalizable, future directions would include defining how to incorporate LUS into clinical management and its role in screening lower-risk populations. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020-07 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7390587/ /pubmed/32726240 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.5.47743 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Pare et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Endemic Infections Pare, Joseph R. Camelo, Ingrid Mayo, Kelly C. Leo, Megan M. Dugas, Julianne N. Nelson, Kerrie P. Baker, William E. Shareef, Faizah Mitchell, Patricia M. Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M. Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 |
title | Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 |
title_full | Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 |
title_short | Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound Is More Sensitive than Chest Radiograph for Evaluation of COVID-19 |
title_sort | point-of-care lung ultrasound is more sensitive than chest radiograph for evaluation of covid-19 |
topic | Endemic Infections |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32726240 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.5.47743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parejosephr pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT cameloingrid pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT mayokellyc pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT leomeganm pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT dugasjuliannen pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT nelsonkerriep pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT bakerwilliame pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT shareeffaizah pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT mitchellpatriciam pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 AT schechterperkinselissam pointofcarelungultrasoundismoresensitivethanchestradiographforevaluationofcovid19 |