Cargando…

Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Interfacility transfers from rural emergency departments (EDs) are an important means of access to timely and specialized care. METHODS: Our goal was to identify and explore facilitators and barriers in transfer processes and their implications for emergency rural care and access. Semi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNaughton, Candace D., Bonnet, Kemberlee, Schlundt, David, Mohr, Nicholas M., Chung, Suemin, Kaboli, Peter J., Ward, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32726256
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46059
_version_ 1783564481609072640
author McNaughton, Candace D.
Bonnet, Kemberlee
Schlundt, David
Mohr, Nicholas M.
Chung, Suemin
Kaboli, Peter J.
Ward, Michael J.
author_facet McNaughton, Candace D.
Bonnet, Kemberlee
Schlundt, David
Mohr, Nicholas M.
Chung, Suemin
Kaboli, Peter J.
Ward, Michael J.
author_sort McNaughton, Candace D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Interfacility transfers from rural emergency departments (EDs) are an important means of access to timely and specialized care. METHODS: Our goal was to identify and explore facilitators and barriers in transfer processes and their implications for emergency rural care and access. Semi-structured interviews with ED staff at five rural and two urban Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach to identify themes and construct a conceptual framework. RESULTS: From 81 interviews with clinical and administrative staff between March–June 2018, four themes in the interfacility transfer process emerged: 1) patient factors; 2) system resources; and 3) processes and communication for transfers, which culminate in 4) the location decision. Current and anticipated resource limitations were highly influential in transfer processes, which were described as burdensome and diverting resources from clinical care for emergency patients. Location decision was highly influenced by complexity of the transfer process, while perceived quality at the receiving location or patient preferences were not reported in interviews as being primary drivers of location decision. Transfers were described as burdensome for patients and their families. Finally, patients with mental health conditions epitomized challenges of emergency transfers. CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfers from rural EDs are multifaceted, resource-driven processes that require complex coordination. Anticipated resource needs and the transfer process itself are important determinants in the location decision, while quality of care or patient preferences were not reported as key determinants by interviewees. These findings identify potential benefits from tracking transfer boarding as an operational measure, directed feedback regarding outcomes of transferred patients, and simplified transfer processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7390588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73905882020-07-31 Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis McNaughton, Candace D. Bonnet, Kemberlee Schlundt, David Mohr, Nicholas M. Chung, Suemin Kaboli, Peter J. Ward, Michael J. West J Emerg Med Emergency Medical Services INTRODUCTION: Interfacility transfers from rural emergency departments (EDs) are an important means of access to timely and specialized care. METHODS: Our goal was to identify and explore facilitators and barriers in transfer processes and their implications for emergency rural care and access. Semi-structured interviews with ED staff at five rural and two urban Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals were recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach to identify themes and construct a conceptual framework. RESULTS: From 81 interviews with clinical and administrative staff between March–June 2018, four themes in the interfacility transfer process emerged: 1) patient factors; 2) system resources; and 3) processes and communication for transfers, which culminate in 4) the location decision. Current and anticipated resource limitations were highly influential in transfer processes, which were described as burdensome and diverting resources from clinical care for emergency patients. Location decision was highly influenced by complexity of the transfer process, while perceived quality at the receiving location or patient preferences were not reported in interviews as being primary drivers of location decision. Transfers were described as burdensome for patients and their families. Finally, patients with mental health conditions epitomized challenges of emergency transfers. CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfers from rural EDs are multifaceted, resource-driven processes that require complex coordination. Anticipated resource needs and the transfer process itself are important determinants in the location decision, while quality of care or patient preferences were not reported as key determinants by interviewees. These findings identify potential benefits from tracking transfer boarding as an operational measure, directed feedback regarding outcomes of transferred patients, and simplified transfer processes. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020-07 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7390588/ /pubmed/32726256 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46059 Text en Copyright: © 2020 McNaughton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medical Services
McNaughton, Candace D.
Bonnet, Kemberlee
Schlundt, David
Mohr, Nicholas M.
Chung, Suemin
Kaboli, Peter J.
Ward, Michael J.
Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis
title Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis
title_full Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis
title_fullStr Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis
title_short Rural Interfacility Emergency Department Transfers: Framework and Qualitative Analysis
title_sort rural interfacility emergency department transfers: framework and qualitative analysis
topic Emergency Medical Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32726256
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.3.46059
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnaughtoncandaced ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis
AT bonnetkemberlee ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis
AT schlundtdavid ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis
AT mohrnicholasm ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis
AT chungsuemin ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis
AT kabolipeterj ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis
AT wardmichaelj ruralinterfacilityemergencydepartmenttransfersframeworkandqualitativeanalysis