Cargando…

Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study

BACKGROUND: Optimal sampling is critical for the performance of blood cultures (BCs). Most guidelines recommend collecting 40 ml of blood, divided between two venipuncture sites, i.e., multi-sampling strategy (MSS). Sampling through a single venipuncture site, i.e., single-sampling strategy (SSS) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, David, Larsson, Anna, Parke, Åsa, Unge, Christian, Henning, Claes, Sundén-Cullberg, Jonas, Somell, Anna, Strålin, Kristoffer, Özenci, Volkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793149
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01639
_version_ 1783564548890951680
author Yu, David
Larsson, Anna
Parke, Åsa
Unge, Christian
Henning, Claes
Sundén-Cullberg, Jonas
Somell, Anna
Strålin, Kristoffer
Özenci, Volkan
author_facet Yu, David
Larsson, Anna
Parke, Åsa
Unge, Christian
Henning, Claes
Sundén-Cullberg, Jonas
Somell, Anna
Strålin, Kristoffer
Özenci, Volkan
author_sort Yu, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal sampling is critical for the performance of blood cultures (BCs). Most guidelines recommend collecting 40 ml of blood, divided between two venipuncture sites, i.e., multi-sampling strategy (MSS). Sampling through a single venipuncture site, i.e., single-sampling strategy (SSS) is easier; however, the diagnostic performance of SSS compared to MSS remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to study if SSS is non-inferior to MSS for detection of pathogenic microorganisms. METHODS: A prospective, paired, non-inferiority design was used. Patients with clinically suspected sepsis admitted to an Emergency Department were included. Six BC bottles were simultaneously collected, consisting of four BC bottles from the first arm and two from the other arm. SSS consisted of BC bottles 1, 2, 3, and 4, and MSS consisted of BC bottles 1, 2, 5, and 6. Samples were incubated in a BacT/ALERT BC system. RESULTS: The final analysis included 549 episodes. Pathogenic microorganisms were detected in 162 cases (29.5%) with MSS and 160 cases (29.1%) with SSS, yielding an absolute difference of 0.36%, with a 95% confidence interval of -1.33 to 2.06%, which did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%. MSS tended to produce more contaminant growth (7.3% of cases) than SSS (5.3% of cases; p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: The study showed that SSS was non-inferior to MSS in detecting pathogenic microorganisms and supports the use of SSS as a routine method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7390949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73909492020-08-12 Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study Yu, David Larsson, Anna Parke, Åsa Unge, Christian Henning, Claes Sundén-Cullberg, Jonas Somell, Anna Strålin, Kristoffer Özenci, Volkan Front Microbiol Microbiology BACKGROUND: Optimal sampling is critical for the performance of blood cultures (BCs). Most guidelines recommend collecting 40 ml of blood, divided between two venipuncture sites, i.e., multi-sampling strategy (MSS). Sampling through a single venipuncture site, i.e., single-sampling strategy (SSS) is easier; however, the diagnostic performance of SSS compared to MSS remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to study if SSS is non-inferior to MSS for detection of pathogenic microorganisms. METHODS: A prospective, paired, non-inferiority design was used. Patients with clinically suspected sepsis admitted to an Emergency Department were included. Six BC bottles were simultaneously collected, consisting of four BC bottles from the first arm and two from the other arm. SSS consisted of BC bottles 1, 2, 3, and 4, and MSS consisted of BC bottles 1, 2, 5, and 6. Samples were incubated in a BacT/ALERT BC system. RESULTS: The final analysis included 549 episodes. Pathogenic microorganisms were detected in 162 cases (29.5%) with MSS and 160 cases (29.1%) with SSS, yielding an absolute difference of 0.36%, with a 95% confidence interval of -1.33 to 2.06%, which did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%. MSS tended to produce more contaminant growth (7.3% of cases) than SSS (5.3% of cases; p = 0.072). CONCLUSION: The study showed that SSS was non-inferior to MSS in detecting pathogenic microorganisms and supports the use of SSS as a routine method. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7390949/ /pubmed/32793149 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01639 Text en Copyright © 2020 Yu, Larsson, Parke, Unge, Henning, Sundén-Cullberg, Somell, Strålin and Özenci. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Yu, David
Larsson, Anna
Parke, Åsa
Unge, Christian
Henning, Claes
Sundén-Cullberg, Jonas
Somell, Anna
Strålin, Kristoffer
Özenci, Volkan
Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study
title Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study
title_full Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study
title_fullStr Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study
title_full_unstemmed Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study
title_short Single-Sampling Strategy vs. Multi-Sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in Sepsis: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study
title_sort single-sampling strategy vs. multi-sampling strategy for blood cultures in sepsis: a prospective non-inferiority study
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7390949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793149
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01639
work_keys_str_mv AT yudavid singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT larssonanna singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT parkeasa singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT ungechristian singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT henningclaes singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT sundencullbergjonas singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT somellanna singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT stralinkristoffer singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy
AT ozencivolkan singlesamplingstrategyvsmultisamplingstrategyforbloodculturesinsepsisaprospectivenoninferioritystudy