Cargando…

The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety

Acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are widely used in cardiogenic shock (CS) despite a lack of high-quality clinical evidence to guide their use. Multiple devices exist across a spectrum from modest to complete support, and each is associated with unique risks. In this review, we sum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapur, Navin K., Whitehead, Evan H., Thayer, Katherine L., Pahuja, Mohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765837
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25518.1
_version_ 1783564560846815232
author Kapur, Navin K.
Whitehead, Evan H.
Thayer, Katherine L.
Pahuja, Mohit
author_facet Kapur, Navin K.
Whitehead, Evan H.
Thayer, Katherine L.
Pahuja, Mohit
author_sort Kapur, Navin K.
collection PubMed
description Acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are widely used in cardiogenic shock (CS) despite a lack of high-quality clinical evidence to guide their use. Multiple devices exist across a spectrum from modest to complete support, and each is associated with unique risks. In this review, we summarize existing data on complications associated with the three most widely used acute MCS platforms: the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella systems, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). We review evidence from available randomized trials and highlight challenges comparing complication rates from case series and comparative observational studies where a lack of granular data precludes appropriate matching of patients by CS severity. We further offer a series of best practices to help shock practitioners minimize the risk of MCS-associated complications and ensure the best possible outcomes for patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7391013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73910132020-08-05 The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety Kapur, Navin K. Whitehead, Evan H. Thayer, Katherine L. Pahuja, Mohit F1000Res Review Acute mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are widely used in cardiogenic shock (CS) despite a lack of high-quality clinical evidence to guide their use. Multiple devices exist across a spectrum from modest to complete support, and each is associated with unique risks. In this review, we summarize existing data on complications associated with the three most widely used acute MCS platforms: the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella systems, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). We review evidence from available randomized trials and highlight challenges comparing complication rates from case series and comparative observational studies where a lack of granular data precludes appropriate matching of patients by CS severity. We further offer a series of best practices to help shock practitioners minimize the risk of MCS-associated complications and ensure the best possible outcomes for patients. F1000 Research Limited 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7391013/ /pubmed/32765837 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25518.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Kapur NK et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Kapur, Navin K.
Whitehead, Evan H.
Thayer, Katherine L.
Pahuja, Mohit
The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
title The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
title_full The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
title_fullStr The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
title_full_unstemmed The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
title_short The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
title_sort science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765837
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.25518.1
work_keys_str_mv AT kapurnavink thescienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT whiteheadevanh thescienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT thayerkatherinel thescienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT pahujamohit thescienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT kapurnavink scienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT whiteheadevanh scienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT thayerkatherinel scienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety
AT pahujamohit scienceofsafetycomplicationsassociatedwiththeuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportincardiogenicshockandbestpracticestomaximizesafety