Cargando…

Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations

1. Conservation and population management decisions often rely on population models parameterized using census data. However, the sampling regime, precision, sample size, and methods used to collect census data are usually heterogeneous in time and space. Decisions about how to derive population‐wid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engbo, Søs, Bull, James C., Börger, Luca, Stringell, Thomas B., Lock, Kate, Morgan, Lisa, Jones, Owen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6475
_version_ 1783564613458067456
author Engbo, Søs
Bull, James C.
Börger, Luca
Stringell, Thomas B.
Lock, Kate
Morgan, Lisa
Jones, Owen R.
author_facet Engbo, Søs
Bull, James C.
Börger, Luca
Stringell, Thomas B.
Lock, Kate
Morgan, Lisa
Jones, Owen R.
author_sort Engbo, Søs
collection PubMed
description 1. Conservation and population management decisions often rely on population models parameterized using census data. However, the sampling regime, precision, sample size, and methods used to collect census data are usually heterogeneous in time and space. Decisions about how to derive population‐wide estimates from this patchwork of data are complicated and may bias estimated population dynamics, with important implications for subsequent management decisions. 2. Here, we explore the impact of site selection and data aggregation decisions on pup survival estimates, and downstream estimates derived from parameterized matrix population models (MPMs), using a long‐term dataset on grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) pup survival from southwestern Wales. The spatiotemporal and methodological heterogeneity of the data are fairly typical for ecological census data and it is, therefore, a good model to address this topic. 3. Data were collected from 46 sampling locations (sites) over 25 years, and we explore the impact of data handling decisions by varying how years and sampling locations are combined to parameterize pup survival in population‐level MPMs. We focus on pup survival because abundant high‐quality data are available on this developmental stage. 4. We found that survival probability was highly variable with most variation being at the site level, and poorly correlated among sampling sites. This variation could generate marked differences in predicted population dynamics depending on sampling strategy. The sample size required for a confident survival estimate also varied markedly geographically. 5. We conclude that for populations with highly variable vital rates among sub‐populations, site selection and data aggregation methods are important. In particular, including peripheral or less frequently used areas can introduce substantial variation into population estimates. This is likely to be context‐dependent, but these choices, including the use of appropriate weights when summarizing across sampling areas, should be explored to ensure that management actions are successful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7391327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73913272020-08-04 Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations Engbo, Søs Bull, James C. Börger, Luca Stringell, Thomas B. Lock, Kate Morgan, Lisa Jones, Owen R. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Conservation and population management decisions often rely on population models parameterized using census data. However, the sampling regime, precision, sample size, and methods used to collect census data are usually heterogeneous in time and space. Decisions about how to derive population‐wide estimates from this patchwork of data are complicated and may bias estimated population dynamics, with important implications for subsequent management decisions. 2. Here, we explore the impact of site selection and data aggregation decisions on pup survival estimates, and downstream estimates derived from parameterized matrix population models (MPMs), using a long‐term dataset on grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) pup survival from southwestern Wales. The spatiotemporal and methodological heterogeneity of the data are fairly typical for ecological census data and it is, therefore, a good model to address this topic. 3. Data were collected from 46 sampling locations (sites) over 25 years, and we explore the impact of data handling decisions by varying how years and sampling locations are combined to parameterize pup survival in population‐level MPMs. We focus on pup survival because abundant high‐quality data are available on this developmental stage. 4. We found that survival probability was highly variable with most variation being at the site level, and poorly correlated among sampling sites. This variation could generate marked differences in predicted population dynamics depending on sampling strategy. The sample size required for a confident survival estimate also varied markedly geographically. 5. We conclude that for populations with highly variable vital rates among sub‐populations, site selection and data aggregation methods are important. In particular, including peripheral or less frequently used areas can introduce substantial variation into population estimates. This is likely to be context‐dependent, but these choices, including the use of appropriate weights when summarizing across sampling areas, should be explored to ensure that management actions are successful. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7391327/ /pubmed/32760543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6475 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Engbo, Søs
Bull, James C.
Börger, Luca
Stringell, Thomas B.
Lock, Kate
Morgan, Lisa
Jones, Owen R.
Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
title Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
title_full Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
title_fullStr Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
title_full_unstemmed Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
title_short Census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
title_sort census data aggregation decisions can affect population‐level inference in heterogeneous populations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6475
work_keys_str_mv AT engbosøs censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations
AT bulljamesc censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations
AT borgerluca censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations
AT stringellthomasb censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations
AT lockkate censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations
AT morganlisa censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations
AT jonesowenr censusdataaggregationdecisionscanaffectpopulationlevelinferenceinheterogeneouspopulations