Cargando…

Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal

BACKGROUND: Undernourished people have an increased risk of premature mortality from both infectious and non-communicable diseases. Aside from screening purposes, assessment of nutritional status is a useful tool in management and evaluation of various chronic diseases. Body-Mass-Index (BMI) is toda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorup, Lene, Hamann, Sophie Amalie, Kallestrup, Per, Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth, Tripathee, Ashish, Neupane, Dinesh, Patsche, Cecilie Blenstrup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09294-0
_version_ 1783564670070685696
author Thorup, Lene
Hamann, Sophie Amalie
Kallestrup, Per
Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth
Tripathee, Ashish
Neupane, Dinesh
Patsche, Cecilie Blenstrup
author_facet Thorup, Lene
Hamann, Sophie Amalie
Kallestrup, Per
Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth
Tripathee, Ashish
Neupane, Dinesh
Patsche, Cecilie Blenstrup
author_sort Thorup, Lene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Undernourished people have an increased risk of premature mortality from both infectious and non-communicable diseases. Aside from screening purposes, assessment of nutritional status is a useful tool in management and evaluation of various chronic diseases. Body-Mass-Index (BMI) is today the most commonly used marker of nutritional status however, this method presents a challenge in many low resource settings and immobile patients. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is another anthropometric measure that requires minimal equipment and little training. So far, MUAC cutoffs for undernutrition are well established in children < 5 years but there is still no consensus for a specific cutoff in adults. The objective of this study was to compare MUAC with BMI and suggest a MUAC cut-off corresponding to a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 to identify underweight in adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two urban public hospitals in Nepal. The following variables where collected: MUAC, weight, height, sex, age and self-reported medical history. Exclusion criteria: < 19 years of age, pregnancy and oedema. Sensitivity and specificity for a MUAC value corresponding to BMI < 18.5 was calculated. ROC analysis was performed for male and female as well as Pearson’s correlation of MUAC and BMI. RESULTS: A total of 302 people between 18 and 86 years of age, 197 women and 105 men, were included. Of these, 90 people suffered from rheumatic heart disease. MUAC was highly correlated with BMI in both women r = 0.889 and men r = 0.846. Best statistically derived MUAC cutoff corresponding to a BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2) was 24.5 cm (Youdens Index = 0.75; sensitivity 92.86; specificity 82.48), with high predictive value (AUROCC> 0.9). The setting based optimal MUAC cutoff was also 24.5 cm. No considerable variation was found in sex- and disease specific subgroups. CONCLUSION: MUAC is strongly correlated with BMI in adults in Nepal. For simplicity, a MUAC of 24.5 cm is the optimal statistically and setting based cutoff in both women and men to identify underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2)).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7391598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73915982020-08-04 Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal Thorup, Lene Hamann, Sophie Amalie Kallestrup, Per Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth Tripathee, Ashish Neupane, Dinesh Patsche, Cecilie Blenstrup BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Undernourished people have an increased risk of premature mortality from both infectious and non-communicable diseases. Aside from screening purposes, assessment of nutritional status is a useful tool in management and evaluation of various chronic diseases. Body-Mass-Index (BMI) is today the most commonly used marker of nutritional status however, this method presents a challenge in many low resource settings and immobile patients. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is another anthropometric measure that requires minimal equipment and little training. So far, MUAC cutoffs for undernutrition are well established in children < 5 years but there is still no consensus for a specific cutoff in adults. The objective of this study was to compare MUAC with BMI and suggest a MUAC cut-off corresponding to a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 to identify underweight in adults. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at two urban public hospitals in Nepal. The following variables where collected: MUAC, weight, height, sex, age and self-reported medical history. Exclusion criteria: < 19 years of age, pregnancy and oedema. Sensitivity and specificity for a MUAC value corresponding to BMI < 18.5 was calculated. ROC analysis was performed for male and female as well as Pearson’s correlation of MUAC and BMI. RESULTS: A total of 302 people between 18 and 86 years of age, 197 women and 105 men, were included. Of these, 90 people suffered from rheumatic heart disease. MUAC was highly correlated with BMI in both women r = 0.889 and men r = 0.846. Best statistically derived MUAC cutoff corresponding to a BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2) was 24.5 cm (Youdens Index = 0.75; sensitivity 92.86; specificity 82.48), with high predictive value (AUROCC> 0.9). The setting based optimal MUAC cutoff was also 24.5 cm. No considerable variation was found in sex- and disease specific subgroups. CONCLUSION: MUAC is strongly correlated with BMI in adults in Nepal. For simplicity, a MUAC of 24.5 cm is the optimal statistically and setting based cutoff in both women and men to identify underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2)). BioMed Central 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7391598/ /pubmed/32727437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09294-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thorup, Lene
Hamann, Sophie Amalie
Kallestrup, Per
Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth
Tripathee, Ashish
Neupane, Dinesh
Patsche, Cecilie Blenstrup
Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
title Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
title_full Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
title_fullStr Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
title_short Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
title_sort mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from nepal
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09294-0
work_keys_str_mv AT thoruplene midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal
AT hamannsophieamalie midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal
AT kallestrupper midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal
AT hjortdalvibekeelisabeth midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal
AT tripatheeashish midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal
AT neupanedinesh midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal
AT patschececilieblenstrup midupperarmcircumferenceasanindicatorofunderweightinadultsacrosssectionalstudyfromnepal