Cargando…
Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences
BACKGROUND: Although patient participation is strongly associated with high quality of healthcare, valid means to measure and report a comprehensive notion of patient participation are scarce. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation (4Ps) is a new healthcare practice and research tool, com...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05574-y |
_version_ | 1783564682977607680 |
---|---|
author | Eldh, Ann Catrine Holmefur, Marie Luhr, Kristina Wenemark, Marika |
author_facet | Eldh, Ann Catrine Holmefur, Marie Luhr, Kristina Wenemark, Marika |
author_sort | Eldh, Ann Catrine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although patient participation is strongly associated with high quality of healthcare, valid means to measure and report a comprehensive notion of patient participation are scarce. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation (4Ps) is a new healthcare practice and research tool, comprising patients’ preferences as well as experiences. The 4Ps employs 12 items for the patient to conceptualise patient participation. The aim of this paper is to describe how the two perspectives of patient participation, namely preferences and experiences, can be combined to visualise and report preference-based patient participation. METHODS: With four response alternatives in each section, the 4Ps offers sixteen possible combinations of degree of match per item. Theoretical and clinical principles fostered a tentative order of six ranks and three levels of preference-based patient participation. To test the standard, statistical analyses for ordinal data were performed, using data from a randomised controlled trial evaluating an intervention aiming to improve patient participation. Further, structures for visualising the preference-based patient participation of individuals and groups were suggested. RESULTS: Data from the 4Ps demonstrated the individuals’ preference-based patient participation, indicating either a match or a mismatch for each item. Mismatches represented either the experience of participation surpassing the patient’s preferences, or the patient’s preferences for patient participation not being established. At group level, the suggested approach for visualising and reporting the 4Ps demonstrated that the intervention group had a significantly higher proportion of sufficient preference-based patient participation for certain items than the control group. These results had not been identified earlier, when using the preferences and experiences of patient participation as separate measures. CONCLUSIONS: Ways to easily acquaint stakeholders with patients’ preferences for patient participation are needed, in order for healthcare staff to better use resources to match the basic requirements of individuals and groups. While the 4Ps can guide professionals to patient participation as framed in legislations, concept analyses and by patients, a visualisation of the results is needed to capture preference-based patient participation. The proposed route to representing degree of match in preferences and experiences may also be relevant to other dimensions of quality of healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7391651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73916512020-08-04 Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences Eldh, Ann Catrine Holmefur, Marie Luhr, Kristina Wenemark, Marika BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Although patient participation is strongly associated with high quality of healthcare, valid means to measure and report a comprehensive notion of patient participation are scarce. The Patient Preferences for Patient Participation (4Ps) is a new healthcare practice and research tool, comprising patients’ preferences as well as experiences. The 4Ps employs 12 items for the patient to conceptualise patient participation. The aim of this paper is to describe how the two perspectives of patient participation, namely preferences and experiences, can be combined to visualise and report preference-based patient participation. METHODS: With four response alternatives in each section, the 4Ps offers sixteen possible combinations of degree of match per item. Theoretical and clinical principles fostered a tentative order of six ranks and three levels of preference-based patient participation. To test the standard, statistical analyses for ordinal data were performed, using data from a randomised controlled trial evaluating an intervention aiming to improve patient participation. Further, structures for visualising the preference-based patient participation of individuals and groups were suggested. RESULTS: Data from the 4Ps demonstrated the individuals’ preference-based patient participation, indicating either a match or a mismatch for each item. Mismatches represented either the experience of participation surpassing the patient’s preferences, or the patient’s preferences for patient participation not being established. At group level, the suggested approach for visualising and reporting the 4Ps demonstrated that the intervention group had a significantly higher proportion of sufficient preference-based patient participation for certain items than the control group. These results had not been identified earlier, when using the preferences and experiences of patient participation as separate measures. CONCLUSIONS: Ways to easily acquaint stakeholders with patients’ preferences for patient participation are needed, in order for healthcare staff to better use resources to match the basic requirements of individuals and groups. While the 4Ps can guide professionals to patient participation as framed in legislations, concept analyses and by patients, a visualisation of the results is needed to capture preference-based patient participation. The proposed route to representing degree of match in preferences and experiences may also be relevant to other dimensions of quality of healthcare. BioMed Central 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7391651/ /pubmed/32727451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05574-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Eldh, Ann Catrine Holmefur, Marie Luhr, Kristina Wenemark, Marika Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
title | Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
title_full | Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
title_fullStr | Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
title_short | Assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
title_sort | assessing and reporting patient participation by means of patient preferences and experiences |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05574-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eldhanncatrine assessingandreportingpatientparticipationbymeansofpatientpreferencesandexperiences AT holmefurmarie assessingandreportingpatientparticipationbymeansofpatientpreferencesandexperiences AT luhrkristina assessingandreportingpatientparticipationbymeansofpatientpreferencesandexperiences AT wenemarkmarika assessingandreportingpatientparticipationbymeansofpatientpreferencesandexperiences |