Cargando…
Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves
Metabolic exchange is widespread in natural microbial communities and an important driver of ecosystem structure and diversity, yet it remains unclear what determines whether microbes evolve division of labor or maintain metabolic autonomy. Here we use a mechanistic model to study how metabolic stra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-1107-x |
_version_ | 1783564721460346880 |
---|---|
author | Meijer, Jeroen van Dijk, Bram Hogeweg, Paulien |
author_facet | Meijer, Jeroen van Dijk, Bram Hogeweg, Paulien |
author_sort | Meijer, Jeroen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metabolic exchange is widespread in natural microbial communities and an important driver of ecosystem structure and diversity, yet it remains unclear what determines whether microbes evolve division of labor or maintain metabolic autonomy. Here we use a mechanistic model to study how metabolic strategies evolve in a constant, one resource environment, when metabolic networks are allowed to freely evolve. We find that initially identical ancestral communities of digital organisms follow different evolutionary trajectories, as some communities become dominated by a single, autonomous lineage, while others are formed by stably coexisting lineages that cross-feed on essential building blocks. Our results show how without presupposed cellular trade-offs or external drivers such as temporal niches, diverse metabolic strategies spontaneously emerge from the interplay between ecology, spatial structure, and metabolic constraints that arise during the evolution of metabolic networks. Thus, in the long term, whether microbes remain autonomous or evolve metabolic division of labour is an evolutionary contingency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7391776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73917762020-08-12 Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves Meijer, Jeroen van Dijk, Bram Hogeweg, Paulien Commun Biol Article Metabolic exchange is widespread in natural microbial communities and an important driver of ecosystem structure and diversity, yet it remains unclear what determines whether microbes evolve division of labor or maintain metabolic autonomy. Here we use a mechanistic model to study how metabolic strategies evolve in a constant, one resource environment, when metabolic networks are allowed to freely evolve. We find that initially identical ancestral communities of digital organisms follow different evolutionary trajectories, as some communities become dominated by a single, autonomous lineage, while others are formed by stably coexisting lineages that cross-feed on essential building blocks. Our results show how without presupposed cellular trade-offs or external drivers such as temporal niches, diverse metabolic strategies spontaneously emerge from the interplay between ecology, spatial structure, and metabolic constraints that arise during the evolution of metabolic networks. Thus, in the long term, whether microbes remain autonomous or evolve metabolic division of labour is an evolutionary contingency. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7391776/ /pubmed/32728180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-1107-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Meijer, Jeroen van Dijk, Bram Hogeweg, Paulien Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
title | Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
title_full | Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
title_fullStr | Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
title_full_unstemmed | Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
title_short | Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
title_sort | contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32728180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-1107-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meijerjeroen contingentevolutionofalternativemetabolicnetworktopologiesdetermineswhethercrossfeedingevolves AT vandijkbram contingentevolutionofalternativemetabolicnetworktopologiesdetermineswhethercrossfeedingevolves AT hogewegpaulien contingentevolutionofalternativemetabolicnetworktopologiesdetermineswhethercrossfeedingevolves |