Cargando…
Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia
AIMS: We assessed how altered diagnostic processes and criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) recommended by the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and Australia for use during the COVID-19 pandemic would affect both GDM frequency and related adverse outcomes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 5974...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32739381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108353 |
_version_ | 1783564759869685760 |
---|---|
author | McIntyre, H. David Gibbons, Kristen S. Ma, Ronald C.W. Tam, Wing Hung Sacks, David A. Lowe, Julia Madsen, Lene R. Catalano, Patrick M. |
author_facet | McIntyre, H. David Gibbons, Kristen S. Ma, Ronald C.W. Tam, Wing Hung Sacks, David A. Lowe, Julia Madsen, Lene R. Catalano, Patrick M. |
author_sort | McIntyre, H. David |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: We assessed how altered diagnostic processes and criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) recommended by the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and Australia for use during the COVID-19 pandemic would affect both GDM frequency and related adverse outcomes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 5974 HAPO study women with singleton pregnancies who underwent 75 g OGTTs and HbA1c assays between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation and who received no treatment for GDM. RESULTS: All post COVID-19 modified pathways reduced GDM frequency – UK (81%), Canada (82%) and Australia (25%). Canadian women whose GDM would remain undetected post COVID-19 (missed GDMs) displayed similar rates of pregnancy complications to those with post COVID-19 GDM. Using UK modifications, the missed GDM group were at slightly lower risk whilst the women missed using the Australian modifications were at substantially lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: The modifications in GDM diagnosis proposed for the UK, Canada and Australia result in differing reductions of GDM frequency. Each has both potential benefits in terms of reduction in potential exposure to COVID-19 and costs in terms of missed opportunities to influence pregnancy and postpartum outcomes. These factors should be considered when deciding which protocol is most appropriate for a particular context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7391984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73919842020-07-31 Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia McIntyre, H. David Gibbons, Kristen S. Ma, Ronald C.W. Tam, Wing Hung Sacks, David A. Lowe, Julia Madsen, Lene R. Catalano, Patrick M. Diabetes Res Clin Pract Article AIMS: We assessed how altered diagnostic processes and criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) recommended by the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and Australia for use during the COVID-19 pandemic would affect both GDM frequency and related adverse outcomes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 5974 HAPO study women with singleton pregnancies who underwent 75 g OGTTs and HbA1c assays between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation and who received no treatment for GDM. RESULTS: All post COVID-19 modified pathways reduced GDM frequency – UK (81%), Canada (82%) and Australia (25%). Canadian women whose GDM would remain undetected post COVID-19 (missed GDMs) displayed similar rates of pregnancy complications to those with post COVID-19 GDM. Using UK modifications, the missed GDM group were at slightly lower risk whilst the women missed using the Australian modifications were at substantially lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: The modifications in GDM diagnosis proposed for the UK, Canada and Australia result in differing reductions of GDM frequency. Each has both potential benefits in terms of reduction in potential exposure to COVID-19 and costs in terms of missed opportunities to influence pregnancy and postpartum outcomes. These factors should be considered when deciding which protocol is most appropriate for a particular context. Elsevier B.V. 2020-09 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7391984/ /pubmed/32739381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108353 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article McIntyre, H. David Gibbons, Kristen S. Ma, Ronald C.W. Tam, Wing Hung Sacks, David A. Lowe, Julia Madsen, Lene R. Catalano, Patrick M. Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia |
title | Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia |
title_full | Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia |
title_fullStr | Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia |
title_short | Testing for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An evaluation of proposed protocols for the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia |
title_sort | testing for gestational diabetes during the covid-19 pandemic. an evaluation of proposed protocols for the united kingdom, canada and australia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7391984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32739381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcintyrehdavid testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT gibbonskristens testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT maronaldcw testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT tamwinghung testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT sacksdavida testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT lowejulia testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT madsenlener testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia AT catalanopatrickm testingforgestationaldiabetesduringthecovid19pandemicanevaluationofproposedprotocolsfortheunitedkingdomcanadaandaustralia |