Cargando…

A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions

BACKGROUND: Several definitions of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are used for clinical research, but no verified model for use in register data exists. We aimed to compare a novel model created for use in register data—the Karolinska Institutet Model (KIM)–to the clinical definitions regardin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hägg, David, Brenner, Philip, Reutfors, Johan, Li, Gang, DiBernardo, Allitia, Bodén, Robert, Brandt, Lena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32730324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236434
_version_ 1783564805690359808
author Hägg, David
Brenner, Philip
Reutfors, Johan
Li, Gang
DiBernardo, Allitia
Bodén, Robert
Brandt, Lena
author_facet Hägg, David
Brenner, Philip
Reutfors, Johan
Li, Gang
DiBernardo, Allitia
Bodén, Robert
Brandt, Lena
author_sort Hägg, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several definitions of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are used for clinical research, but no verified model for use in register data exists. We aimed to compare a novel model created for use in register data—the Karolinska Institutet Model (KIM)–to the clinical definitions regarding the proportion of patients identified with TRD, their characteristics and clinical outcomes. METHODS: All patients in Sweden initiating antidepressant treatment with a diagnosis of depression in specialized healthcare 2006–2014 were identified and followed in national registers. In KIM, patients who initiated a third sequential, >28-day antidepressant treatment trial were defined as having TRD. Proportion of TRD and patient characteristics were compared with register adaptations of the European Staging Model (ESM), Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Method (MGH-s), and Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Differences in patient characteristics were assessed with Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVAs. Hazard ratios for psychiatric hospitalization and for death from external causes were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regressions. RESULTS: Out of 127,108 antidepressant initiators with depression, the highest proportion of TRD was found using the MGH-s (19.0%), followed by MSM (15.3%), KIM (12.9%), and ESM (9.5%). Clinical characteristics were similar across the models. Compared with TRD patients identified by KIM, those identified by ESM had a marginally higher risk for psychiatric hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.03, 95%CI 1.00–1.05), whereas those identified by MGH-s (aHR 0.92; 0.90–0.94) and MSM (aHR 0.95; 0.94–0.97) had a slightly reduced risk. Patients identified by MGH-s showed a reduced mortality compared with KIM (aHR 0.84; 0.72–0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the differing characteristics of patients captured by various TRD models when used for register research. Models yielding lower proportions of TRD seemed to identify patients with greater morbidity. The KIM may be useful for register based research in TRD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7392234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73922342020-08-05 A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions Hägg, David Brenner, Philip Reutfors, Johan Li, Gang DiBernardo, Allitia Bodén, Robert Brandt, Lena PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Several definitions of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are used for clinical research, but no verified model for use in register data exists. We aimed to compare a novel model created for use in register data—the Karolinska Institutet Model (KIM)–to the clinical definitions regarding the proportion of patients identified with TRD, their characteristics and clinical outcomes. METHODS: All patients in Sweden initiating antidepressant treatment with a diagnosis of depression in specialized healthcare 2006–2014 were identified and followed in national registers. In KIM, patients who initiated a third sequential, >28-day antidepressant treatment trial were defined as having TRD. Proportion of TRD and patient characteristics were compared with register adaptations of the European Staging Model (ESM), Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Method (MGH-s), and Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Differences in patient characteristics were assessed with Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVAs. Hazard ratios for psychiatric hospitalization and for death from external causes were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regressions. RESULTS: Out of 127,108 antidepressant initiators with depression, the highest proportion of TRD was found using the MGH-s (19.0%), followed by MSM (15.3%), KIM (12.9%), and ESM (9.5%). Clinical characteristics were similar across the models. Compared with TRD patients identified by KIM, those identified by ESM had a marginally higher risk for psychiatric hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.03, 95%CI 1.00–1.05), whereas those identified by MGH-s (aHR 0.92; 0.90–0.94) and MSM (aHR 0.95; 0.94–0.97) had a slightly reduced risk. Patients identified by MGH-s showed a reduced mortality compared with KIM (aHR 0.84; 0.72–0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the differing characteristics of patients captured by various TRD models when used for register research. Models yielding lower proportions of TRD seemed to identify patients with greater morbidity. The KIM may be useful for register based research in TRD. Public Library of Science 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7392234/ /pubmed/32730324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236434 Text en © 2020 Hägg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hägg, David
Brenner, Philip
Reutfors, Johan
Li, Gang
DiBernardo, Allitia
Bodén, Robert
Brandt, Lena
A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions
title A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions
title_full A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions
title_fullStr A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions
title_full_unstemmed A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions
title_short A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—Comparison with clinical definitions
title_sort register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression—comparison with clinical definitions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32730324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236434
work_keys_str_mv AT haggdavid aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT brennerphilip aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT reutforsjohan aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT ligang aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT dibernardoallitia aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT bodenrobert aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT brandtlena aregisterbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT haggdavid registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT brennerphilip registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT reutforsjohan registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT ligang registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT dibernardoallitia registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT bodenrobert registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions
AT brandtlena registerbasedapproachtoidentifyingtreatmentresistantdepressioncomparisonwithclinicaldefinitions