Cargando…

A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings

BACKGROUND: Although codes of conduct, guidelines and standards call for healthcare practitioners to protect patients’ dignity, there are widespread concerns about a lack of attention to the dignity of older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in health o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostaszkiewicz, Joan, Dickson-Swift, Virginia, Hutchinson, Alison, Wagg, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01673-x
_version_ 1783564919978852352
author Ostaszkiewicz, Joan
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Hutchinson, Alison
Wagg, Adrian
author_facet Ostaszkiewicz, Joan
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Hutchinson, Alison
Wagg, Adrian
author_sort Ostaszkiewicz, Joan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although codes of conduct, guidelines and standards call for healthcare practitioners to protect patients’ dignity, there are widespread concerns about a lack of attention to the dignity of older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in health or social care settings that provide long-term care. Incontinence and care dependence threatens patient dignity. The aim of this research was to explore, describe and explain the concept of dignity as it relates to continence care for older people requiring long-term care. METHODS: The first four steps of Rodgers evolutionary method of concept analysis were followed. First, a comprehensive and systematic search of databases and key guidelines about continence care was undertaken to identify empirical research about dignity and continence care in older people in facilities that provide permanent residential or inpatient care of older people for day-to-day living. Data were extracted on the authors, date, sample, country of origin, and key definitions, attributes, contexts and consequences from each included record. Findings were inductively analysed and grouped according to whether they were the key attributes and antecedents of dignity in relation to continence care or the consequences of undignified continence care. RESULTS: Of 625 articles identified, 18 were included in the final analysis. Fifty individual attributes were identified that were categorised in 6 domains (respect, empathy, trust, privacy, autonomy and communication). A further 15 were identified that related to the environment (6 physical and 9 social). Key consequences of undignified continence care were also identified and categorised into 3 levels of impact (resident/family member, staff or organisation). CONCLUSIONS: This research resulted in a conceptual understanding of dignity that can be used as a value or guiding principle in an ethic of care for older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in long-term care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7392826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73928262020-08-04 A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings Ostaszkiewicz, Joan Dickson-Swift, Virginia Hutchinson, Alison Wagg, Adrian BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Although codes of conduct, guidelines and standards call for healthcare practitioners to protect patients’ dignity, there are widespread concerns about a lack of attention to the dignity of older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in health or social care settings that provide long-term care. Incontinence and care dependence threatens patient dignity. The aim of this research was to explore, describe and explain the concept of dignity as it relates to continence care for older people requiring long-term care. METHODS: The first four steps of Rodgers evolutionary method of concept analysis were followed. First, a comprehensive and systematic search of databases and key guidelines about continence care was undertaken to identify empirical research about dignity and continence care in older people in facilities that provide permanent residential or inpatient care of older people for day-to-day living. Data were extracted on the authors, date, sample, country of origin, and key definitions, attributes, contexts and consequences from each included record. Findings were inductively analysed and grouped according to whether they were the key attributes and antecedents of dignity in relation to continence care or the consequences of undignified continence care. RESULTS: Of 625 articles identified, 18 were included in the final analysis. Fifty individual attributes were identified that were categorised in 6 domains (respect, empathy, trust, privacy, autonomy and communication). A further 15 were identified that related to the environment (6 physical and 9 social). Key consequences of undignified continence care were also identified and categorised into 3 levels of impact (resident/family member, staff or organisation). CONCLUSIONS: This research resulted in a conceptual understanding of dignity that can be used as a value or guiding principle in an ethic of care for older people who need assistance with toileting, incontinence or bladder or bowel care in long-term care settings. BioMed Central 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7392826/ /pubmed/32727481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01673-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ostaszkiewicz, Joan
Dickson-Swift, Virginia
Hutchinson, Alison
Wagg, Adrian
A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
title A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
title_full A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
title_fullStr A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
title_full_unstemmed A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
title_short A concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
title_sort concept analysis of dignity-protective continence care for care dependent older people in long-term care settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32727481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01673-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ostaszkiewiczjoan aconceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT dicksonswiftvirginia aconceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT hutchinsonalison aconceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT waggadrian aconceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT ostaszkiewiczjoan conceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT dicksonswiftvirginia conceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT hutchinsonalison conceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings
AT waggadrian conceptanalysisofdignityprotectivecontinencecareforcaredependentolderpeopleinlongtermcaresettings