Cargando…
Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only effective curative strategy for small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SINENs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of residual disease and prediction of disease recurrence/progression remains a problematic issue. METHODS: We evaluated 13 SINENs that underwent su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02289-2 |
_version_ | 1783564942897577984 |
---|---|
author | Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios Liu, Man Malczewska, Anna Ogunbiyi, Olagunju Watkins, Jennifer Luong, Tu Vinh Mandair, Dalvinder Caplin, Martyn Toumpanakis, Christos |
author_facet | Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios Liu, Man Malczewska, Anna Ogunbiyi, Olagunju Watkins, Jennifer Luong, Tu Vinh Mandair, Dalvinder Caplin, Martyn Toumpanakis, Christos |
author_sort | Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only effective curative strategy for small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SINENs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of residual disease and prediction of disease recurrence/progression remains a problematic issue. METHODS: We evaluated 13 SINENs that underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour and/or mesenteric mass. Patients were divided in three groups: (a) Group 1: SINENs that underwent resection with curative intent, (b) Group 2: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, which remained stable and (c) Group 3: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, with evidence of any progression at follow-up. NETest and chromogranin A were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively during a 22-month median follow-up period and compared with imaging studies. NETest score <20% was determined as normal, 20–40% low, 41–79% intermediate and ≥80% high score. RESULTS: NETest score was raised in all (100%) SINENs pre-operatively. Surgery with curative intent resulted in NETest score reduction from 78.25 ± 15.32 to 25.25 ± 1.75 (p < 0.05). Low NETest scores post-operatively were evident in all cases without clinical evidence of residual disease (Group 1). However, the low disease activity score suggested the presence of microscopic residual disease. In three cases (75%) with stable disease (Group 2) the NETest score was low consistent with indolent disease. In the progressive disease group (Group 3), a high NETest score was present in three cases (60%) and an intermediate NETest score in the remainder (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood NETest scores accurately identified SINENs and were significantly decreased by curative surgery. Monitoring NETest post-operatively may facilitate management by identifying the presence of residual/progressive disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7392928 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73929282020-08-12 Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios Liu, Man Malczewska, Anna Ogunbiyi, Olagunju Watkins, Jennifer Luong, Tu Vinh Mandair, Dalvinder Caplin, Martyn Toumpanakis, Christos Endocrine Original Article PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only effective curative strategy for small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SINENs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of residual disease and prediction of disease recurrence/progression remains a problematic issue. METHODS: We evaluated 13 SINENs that underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour and/or mesenteric mass. Patients were divided in three groups: (a) Group 1: SINENs that underwent resection with curative intent, (b) Group 2: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, which remained stable and (c) Group 3: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, with evidence of any progression at follow-up. NETest and chromogranin A were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively during a 22-month median follow-up period and compared with imaging studies. NETest score <20% was determined as normal, 20–40% low, 41–79% intermediate and ≥80% high score. RESULTS: NETest score was raised in all (100%) SINENs pre-operatively. Surgery with curative intent resulted in NETest score reduction from 78.25 ± 15.32 to 25.25 ± 1.75 (p < 0.05). Low NETest scores post-operatively were evident in all cases without clinical evidence of residual disease (Group 1). However, the low disease activity score suggested the presence of microscopic residual disease. In three cases (75%) with stable disease (Group 2) the NETest score was low consistent with indolent disease. In the progressive disease group (Group 3), a high NETest score was present in three cases (60%) and an intermediate NETest score in the remainder (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood NETest scores accurately identified SINENs and were significantly decreased by curative surgery. Monitoring NETest post-operatively may facilitate management by identifying the presence of residual/progressive disease. Springer US 2020-04-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7392928/ /pubmed/32291735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02289-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios Liu, Man Malczewska, Anna Ogunbiyi, Olagunju Watkins, Jennifer Luong, Tu Vinh Mandair, Dalvinder Caplin, Martyn Toumpanakis, Christos Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
title | Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
title_full | Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
title_short | Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
title_sort | evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (netest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392928/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02289-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laskaratosfaidonmarios evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT liuman evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT malczewskaanna evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT ogunbiyiolagunju evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT watkinsjennifer evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT luongtuvinh evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT mandairdalvinder evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT caplinmartyn evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection AT toumpanakischristos evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection |