Cargando…

Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection

PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only effective curative strategy for small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SINENs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of residual disease and prediction of disease recurrence/progression remains a problematic issue. METHODS: We evaluated 13 SINENs that underwent su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios, Liu, Man, Malczewska, Anna, Ogunbiyi, Olagunju, Watkins, Jennifer, Luong, Tu Vinh, Mandair, Dalvinder, Caplin, Martyn, Toumpanakis, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02289-2
_version_ 1783564942897577984
author Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios
Liu, Man
Malczewska, Anna
Ogunbiyi, Olagunju
Watkins, Jennifer
Luong, Tu Vinh
Mandair, Dalvinder
Caplin, Martyn
Toumpanakis, Christos
author_facet Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios
Liu, Man
Malczewska, Anna
Ogunbiyi, Olagunju
Watkins, Jennifer
Luong, Tu Vinh
Mandair, Dalvinder
Caplin, Martyn
Toumpanakis, Christos
author_sort Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only effective curative strategy for small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SINENs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of residual disease and prediction of disease recurrence/progression remains a problematic issue. METHODS: We evaluated 13 SINENs that underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour and/or mesenteric mass. Patients were divided in three groups: (a) Group 1: SINENs that underwent resection with curative intent, (b) Group 2: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, which remained stable and (c) Group 3: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, with evidence of any progression at follow-up. NETest and chromogranin A were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively during a 22-month median follow-up period and compared with imaging studies. NETest score <20% was determined as normal, 20–40% low, 41–79% intermediate and ≥80% high score. RESULTS: NETest score was raised in all (100%) SINENs pre-operatively. Surgery with curative intent resulted in NETest score reduction from 78.25 ± 15.32 to 25.25 ± 1.75 (p < 0.05). Low NETest scores post-operatively were evident in all cases without clinical evidence of residual disease (Group 1). However, the low disease activity score suggested the presence of microscopic residual disease. In three cases (75%) with stable disease (Group 2) the NETest score was low consistent with indolent disease. In the progressive disease group (Group 3), a high NETest score was present in three cases (60%) and an intermediate NETest score in the remainder (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood NETest scores accurately identified SINENs and were significantly decreased by curative surgery. Monitoring NETest post-operatively may facilitate management by identifying the presence of residual/progressive disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7392928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73929282020-08-12 Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios Liu, Man Malczewska, Anna Ogunbiyi, Olagunju Watkins, Jennifer Luong, Tu Vinh Mandair, Dalvinder Caplin, Martyn Toumpanakis, Christos Endocrine Original Article PURPOSE: Surgical resection is the only effective curative strategy for small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SINENs). Nevertheless, the evaluation of residual disease and prediction of disease recurrence/progression remains a problematic issue. METHODS: We evaluated 13 SINENs that underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour and/or mesenteric mass. Patients were divided in three groups: (a) Group 1: SINENs that underwent resection with curative intent, (b) Group 2: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, which remained stable and (c) Group 3: SINENs treated with resection in the setting of metastatic disease, with evidence of any progression at follow-up. NETest and chromogranin A were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively during a 22-month median follow-up period and compared with imaging studies. NETest score <20% was determined as normal, 20–40% low, 41–79% intermediate and ≥80% high score. RESULTS: NETest score was raised in all (100%) SINENs pre-operatively. Surgery with curative intent resulted in NETest score reduction from 78.25 ± 15.32 to 25.25 ± 1.75 (p < 0.05). Low NETest scores post-operatively were evident in all cases without clinical evidence of residual disease (Group 1). However, the low disease activity score suggested the presence of microscopic residual disease. In three cases (75%) with stable disease (Group 2) the NETest score was low consistent with indolent disease. In the progressive disease group (Group 3), a high NETest score was present in three cases (60%) and an intermediate NETest score in the remainder (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood NETest scores accurately identified SINENs and were significantly decreased by curative surgery. Monitoring NETest post-operatively may facilitate management by identifying the presence of residual/progressive disease. Springer US 2020-04-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7392928/ /pubmed/32291735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02289-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Laskaratos, Faidon-Marios
Liu, Man
Malczewska, Anna
Ogunbiyi, Olagunju
Watkins, Jennifer
Luong, Tu Vinh
Mandair, Dalvinder
Caplin, Martyn
Toumpanakis, Christos
Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
title Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
title_full Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
title_fullStr Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
title_short Evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (NETest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
title_sort evaluation of circulating transcript analysis (netest) in small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms after surgical resection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32291735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02289-2
work_keys_str_mv AT laskaratosfaidonmarios evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT liuman evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT malczewskaanna evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT ogunbiyiolagunju evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT watkinsjennifer evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT luongtuvinh evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT mandairdalvinder evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT caplinmartyn evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection
AT toumpanakischristos evaluationofcirculatingtranscriptanalysisnetestinsmallintestinalneuroendocrineneoplasmsaftersurgicalresection