Cargando…

Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake

While the microenvironment is known to alter the cellular behavior in terms of metabolism, growth and the degree of endoplasmic reticulum stress, its influence on the nanoparticle uptake is not yet investigated. Specifically, it is not clear if the cells cultured in a microenvironment ingest differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damle, Viraj G., Sharmin, Rokshana, Morita, Aryan, Nie, Linyan, Schirhagl, Romana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793585
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00869
_version_ 1783564996796481536
author Damle, Viraj G.
Sharmin, Rokshana
Morita, Aryan
Nie, Linyan
Schirhagl, Romana
author_facet Damle, Viraj G.
Sharmin, Rokshana
Morita, Aryan
Nie, Linyan
Schirhagl, Romana
author_sort Damle, Viraj G.
collection PubMed
description While the microenvironment is known to alter the cellular behavior in terms of metabolism, growth and the degree of endoplasmic reticulum stress, its influence on the nanoparticle uptake is not yet investigated. Specifically, it is not clear if the cells cultured in a microenvironment ingest different amounts of nanoparticles than cells cultured in a macroenvironment (for example a petri dish). To answer this question, here we used J774 murine macrophages and fluorescent nanodiamonds (FND) as a model system to systematically compare the uptake efficiency of cells cultured in a petri dish and in a microfluidic channel. Specifically, equal numbers of cells were cultured in two devices followed by the FND incubation. Then cells were fixed, stained and imaged to quantify the FND uptake. We show that the FND uptake in the cells cultured in petri dishes is significantly higher than the uptake in a microfluidic chip where the alteration in CO(2) environment, the cell culture medium pH and the surface area to volume ratio seem to be the underlying causes leading to this observed difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7393206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73932062020-08-12 Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake Damle, Viraj G. Sharmin, Rokshana Morita, Aryan Nie, Linyan Schirhagl, Romana Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology While the microenvironment is known to alter the cellular behavior in terms of metabolism, growth and the degree of endoplasmic reticulum stress, its influence on the nanoparticle uptake is not yet investigated. Specifically, it is not clear if the cells cultured in a microenvironment ingest different amounts of nanoparticles than cells cultured in a macroenvironment (for example a petri dish). To answer this question, here we used J774 murine macrophages and fluorescent nanodiamonds (FND) as a model system to systematically compare the uptake efficiency of cells cultured in a petri dish and in a microfluidic channel. Specifically, equal numbers of cells were cultured in two devices followed by the FND incubation. Then cells were fixed, stained and imaged to quantify the FND uptake. We show that the FND uptake in the cells cultured in petri dishes is significantly higher than the uptake in a microfluidic chip where the alteration in CO(2) environment, the cell culture medium pH and the surface area to volume ratio seem to be the underlying causes leading to this observed difference. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7393206/ /pubmed/32793585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00869 Text en Copyright © 2020 Damle, Sharmin, Morita, Nie and Schirhagl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Damle, Viraj G.
Sharmin, Rokshana
Morita, Aryan
Nie, Linyan
Schirhagl, Romana
Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
title Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
title_full Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
title_fullStr Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
title_full_unstemmed Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
title_short Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
title_sort micro versus macro – the effect of environmental confinement on cellular nanoparticle uptake
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793585
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00869
work_keys_str_mv AT damlevirajg microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake
AT sharminrokshana microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake
AT moritaaryan microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake
AT nielinyan microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake
AT schirhaglromana microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake