Cargando…
Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake
While the microenvironment is known to alter the cellular behavior in terms of metabolism, growth and the degree of endoplasmic reticulum stress, its influence on the nanoparticle uptake is not yet investigated. Specifically, it is not clear if the cells cultured in a microenvironment ingest differe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00869 |
_version_ | 1783564996796481536 |
---|---|
author | Damle, Viraj G. Sharmin, Rokshana Morita, Aryan Nie, Linyan Schirhagl, Romana |
author_facet | Damle, Viraj G. Sharmin, Rokshana Morita, Aryan Nie, Linyan Schirhagl, Romana |
author_sort | Damle, Viraj G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | While the microenvironment is known to alter the cellular behavior in terms of metabolism, growth and the degree of endoplasmic reticulum stress, its influence on the nanoparticle uptake is not yet investigated. Specifically, it is not clear if the cells cultured in a microenvironment ingest different amounts of nanoparticles than cells cultured in a macroenvironment (for example a petri dish). To answer this question, here we used J774 murine macrophages and fluorescent nanodiamonds (FND) as a model system to systematically compare the uptake efficiency of cells cultured in a petri dish and in a microfluidic channel. Specifically, equal numbers of cells were cultured in two devices followed by the FND incubation. Then cells were fixed, stained and imaged to quantify the FND uptake. We show that the FND uptake in the cells cultured in petri dishes is significantly higher than the uptake in a microfluidic chip where the alteration in CO(2) environment, the cell culture medium pH and the surface area to volume ratio seem to be the underlying causes leading to this observed difference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7393206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73932062020-08-12 Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake Damle, Viraj G. Sharmin, Rokshana Morita, Aryan Nie, Linyan Schirhagl, Romana Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology While the microenvironment is known to alter the cellular behavior in terms of metabolism, growth and the degree of endoplasmic reticulum stress, its influence on the nanoparticle uptake is not yet investigated. Specifically, it is not clear if the cells cultured in a microenvironment ingest different amounts of nanoparticles than cells cultured in a macroenvironment (for example a petri dish). To answer this question, here we used J774 murine macrophages and fluorescent nanodiamonds (FND) as a model system to systematically compare the uptake efficiency of cells cultured in a petri dish and in a microfluidic channel. Specifically, equal numbers of cells were cultured in two devices followed by the FND incubation. Then cells were fixed, stained and imaged to quantify the FND uptake. We show that the FND uptake in the cells cultured in petri dishes is significantly higher than the uptake in a microfluidic chip where the alteration in CO(2) environment, the cell culture medium pH and the surface area to volume ratio seem to be the underlying causes leading to this observed difference. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7393206/ /pubmed/32793585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00869 Text en Copyright © 2020 Damle, Sharmin, Morita, Nie and Schirhagl. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Damle, Viraj G. Sharmin, Rokshana Morita, Aryan Nie, Linyan Schirhagl, Romana Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake |
title | Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake |
title_full | Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake |
title_fullStr | Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake |
title_full_unstemmed | Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake |
title_short | Micro Versus Macro – The Effect of Environmental Confinement on Cellular Nanoparticle Uptake |
title_sort | micro versus macro – the effect of environmental confinement on cellular nanoparticle uptake |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damlevirajg microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake AT sharminrokshana microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake AT moritaaryan microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake AT nielinyan microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake AT schirhaglromana microversusmacrotheeffectofenvironmentalconfinementoncellularnanoparticleuptake |